Skip to main content 

Owing to the screen size of your device, you may obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site

Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.

(click for menu)
(click for menu)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   ( = this page)
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   ( = this page)
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).
(Be aware that “sponsored” links to other sites will appear atop the actual results.)

Search term(s):



Yankees 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Yankees Projected Pitching

Through games of Tuesday, 23 April 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.011)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Clayton Beeter, actual: 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clayton Beeter, projected: 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nick Burdi, actual: 28 22 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 1 0 297
Nick Burdi, projected: 28 24 6 1 1 1 9 4 0 0 0 0 1063
Nestor Cortes, actual: 118 111 26 3 0 3 38 5 1 0 1 0 516
Nestor Cortes, projected: 119 109 25 5 0 5 44 9 0 0 1 0 645
Jake Cousins, actual: 17 14 4 1 0 1 8 3 0 0 0 0 1485
Jake Cousins, projected: 17 14 3 1 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 569
Caleb Ferguson, actual: 44 38 9 2 0 2 17 5 0 1 0 0 878
Caleb Ferguson, projected: 45 39 9 2 0 1 15 4 0 0 1 0 685
Luis Gil, actual: 84 64 8 4 0 0 12 17 0 1 1 1 423
Luis Gil, projected: 85 70 12 2 0 1 19 14 0 0 1 0 486
Victor González, actual: 36 30 5 1 0 1 9 6 0 0 0 0 583
Victor González, projected: 36 32 7 1 0 1 10 3 0 0 1 0 546
Ian Hamilton, actual: 55 46 9 3 0 0 12 6 0 2 1 0 447
Ian Hamilton, projected: 56 48 10 2 0 1 15 6 0 1 1 0 523
Clay Holmes, actual: 50 47 12 1 0 0 13 1 0 0 2 0 488
Clay Holmes, projected: 51 44 10 2 0 1 13 5 0 0 1 0 620
Jonathan Loáisiga, actual: 20 19 7 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 1021
Jonathan Loáisiga, projected: 20 18 4 1 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 444
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Josh Maciejewski, actual: 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Josh Maciejewski, projected: 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ron Marinaccio, actual: 18 15 2 0 0 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 425
Ron Marinaccio, projected: 18 15 3 1 0 0 5 2 0 0 1 0 585
Cody Poteet, actual: 23 23 6 1 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 526
Cody Poteet, projected: 23 21 5 1 0 1 9 2 0 0 0 0 703
Carlos Rodón, actual: 115 99 23 6 0 2 35 13 0 1 2 0 699
Carlos Rodón, projected: 116 103 24 5 0 3 39 11 0 1 1 0 663
Dennis Santana, actual: 41 37 8 1 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 334
Dennis Santana, projected: 41 35 8 2 0 1 13 5 0 0 1 0 700
Clarke Schmidt, actual: 86 76 23 5 0 2 34 8 0 1 1 0 869
Clarke Schmidt, projected: 87 78 20 5 0 3 33 7 0 1 1 0 802
Marcus Stroman, actual: 115 104 24 6 0 4 42 10 0 0 1 0 656
Marcus Stroman, projected: 116 107 27 5 0 3 40 8 0 1 1 0 656
Luke Weaver, actual: 55 47 9 3 1 2 20 3 1 2 2 0 754
Luke Weaver, projected: 56 50 14 3 0 2 24 4 0 0 0 0 810
Yankees, Actual: 911 798 178 37 1 19 274 89 3 8 12 1 613
Yankees, Projected: 920 813 188 39 1 24 300 89 0 4 11 0 650
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.223 0.231
Slugging Average: 0.343 0.369
Walks (per PA): 0.098 0.097
SOs (per PA): 0.225 0.246
On-Base Average: 0.308 0.314
Power Factor: 1.539 1.596
OPS: 0.651 0.683
TPP Runs (to date): 84 99

Runs differential:
Actual Runs -15 less than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 24 April 2024, at 7:13 am Pacific Time.