Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



White Sox 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 White Sox Projected Pitching

Through games of Wednesday, 1 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.004)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Luisangel Acuña, actual: 1 6 5 2 0 0 1 5 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2983
Luisangel Acuña, projected: 1 6 5 2 0 0 1 5 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3078
Osvaldo Bido, actual: 5 40 33 8 0 0 2 14 5 6 26 0 0 2 0 0 1 966
Osvaldo Bido, projected: 5 40 35 9 2 0 1 14 4 6 26 0 1 1 0 0 1 907
Sean Burke, actual: 17 387 344 80 19 2 11 136 33 39 278 2 2 6 0 0 13 655
Sean Burke, projected: 17 389 343 82 20 1 13 143 38 44 278 1 2 4 3 0 11 743
Jonathan Cannon, actual: 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jonathan Cannon, projected: 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tyler Davis, actual: 22 96 81 16 2 0 2 24 13 14 70 0 2 0 1 2 2 537
Tyler Davis, projected: 22 96 81 16 2 0 2 24 13 14 70 0 2 0 1 2 2 538
Duncan Davitt, actual: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Duncan Davitt, projected: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Seranthony Domínguez, actual: 32 128 109 23 4 0 5 42 16 17 88 0 1 2 2 1 5 794
Seranthony Domínguez, projected: 32 129 113 23 4 0 4 38 14 14 88 0 1 2 1 1 4 663
Brandon Eisert, actual: 22 98 90 23 6 0 5 44 6 14 68 2 0 0 1 0 2 842
Brandon Eisert, projected: 22 98 88 24 6 0 4 42 8 12 68 1 1 1 1 1 3 869
Erick Fedde, actual: 17 351 310 81 12 1 14 137 33 44 239 0 3 3 1 1 4 857
Erick Fedde, projected: 17 352 313 84 16 1 12 139 33 46 239 2 3 2 2 1 9 858
Tyler Gilbert, actual: 4 22 18 7 3 0 2 16 4 7 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 2783
Tyler Gilbert, projected: 4 22 20 5 1 0 1 8 2 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 1175
Jordan Hicks, actual: 24 100 79 22 5 0 1 30 18 11 63 0 2 1 1 2 0 956
Jordan Hicks, projected: 24 100 86 21 4 0 2 30 12 12 63 0 1 2 1 0 1 810
Bryan Hudson, actual: 39 163 134 34 4 0 1 41 16 12 115 4 5 3 2 1 6 636
Bryan Hudson, projected: 39 164 140 28 5 0 4 45 16 13 115 2 3 3 1 1 4 582
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Anthony Kay, actual: 17 367 314 83 14 3 11 136 31 43 240 2 5 15 4 0 8 977
Anthony Kay, projected: 17 368 315 84 20 2 11 142 38 48 240 1 4 11 3 0 4 972
Jordan Leasure, actual: 18 78 69 15 2 0 6 35 8 14 56 0 1 0 0 1 2 856
Jordan Leasure, projected: 18 78 68 15 4 0 4 31 9 11 56 0 1 0 0 0 1 801
Davis Martin, actual: 16 378 348 86 23 0 6 127 24 31 279 0 2 4 1 0 6 536
Davis Martin, projected: 16 380 342 87 19 1 10 138 29 43 279 1 2 5 3 1 7 658
Reese McGuire, actual: 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reese McGuire, projected: 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Chris Murphy, actual: 16 74 62 16 1 1 1 22 10 9 49 0 1 1 1 0 1 850
Chris Murphy, projected: 16 74 64 15 3 0 2 23 8 8 49 0 1 1 1 0 1 780
Sean Newcomb, actual: 31 196 176 35 6 4 1 52 14 15 149 1 0 5 1 2 5 394
Sean Newcomb, projected: 31 197 170 41 7 1 5 65 22 22 149 1 1 2 1 1 3 653
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Doug Nikhazy, actual: 1 9 7 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 405
Doug Nikhazy, projected: 1 9 7 2 1 0 0 3 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
Jedixson Paez, actual: 3 16 12 4 0 0 2 10 3 6 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 2215
Jedixson Paez, projected: 3 16 12 4 0 0 2 10 3 6 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 2214
Trevor Richards, actual: 18 98 92 16 1 1 6 37 6 12 76 0 0 0 0 0 2 567
Trevor Richards, projected: 18 98 86 20 4 0 3 35 10 12 76 1 1 1 1 1 1 621
Joe Rock, actual: 4 53 40 11 1 0 0 12 11 5 31 0 0 2 0 0 0 978
Joe Rock, projected: 4 53 43 11 1 0 1 13 8 4 31 0 0 2 1 0 1 1013
David Sandlin, actual: 4 80 70 15 1 1 4 30 10 13 58 0 0 0 0 0 3 723
David Sandlin, projected: 4 80 70 15 1 1 4 30 10 13 58 0 0 0 0 0 3 729
Noah Schultz, actual: 9 186 153 32 9 2 5 60 26 29 129 2 1 4 1 0 4 716
Noah Schultz, projected: 9 187 154 32 9 2 5 60 26 29 129 2 1 4 1 0 4 720
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tyler Schweitzer, actual: 5 35 32 9 5 0 0 14 3 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 701
Tyler Schweitzer, projected: 5 35 32 9 5 0 0 14 3 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 713
Lucas Sims, actual: 9 46 35 9 2 0 1 14 7 7 30 2 1 1 0 0 0 825
Lucas Sims, projected: 9 46 38 8 2 0 1 15 6 6 30 0 0 1 0 0 1 666
Shane Smith, actual: 3 49 38 12 4 0 1 19 9 12 25 0 0 1 1 0 0 1841
Shane Smith, projected: 3 49 43 10 2 0 1 16 5 6 25 0 0 1 0 0 1 918
Grant Taylor, actual: 32 177 163 35 8 0 3 52 12 18 130 0 2 0 1 0 3 506
Grant Taylor, projected: 32 178 160 38 7 0 2 50 14 20 130 1 2 0 1 1 5 537
White Sox, Actual: 85 3242 2819 675 132 15 91 1110 325 385 2258 15 29 50 18 10 68 383
White Sox, Projected: 85 3253 2836 687 145 9 95 1135 335 399 2258 13 28 43 22 10 68 393


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.239 0.242
Slugging Average: 0.394 0.400
Walks (per PA): 0.100 0.103
SOs (per PA): 0.220 0.224
On-Base Average: 0.326 0.329
Power Factor: 1.644 1.652
OPS: 0.720 0.729
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 383
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 393
Actual Runs Scored: 385

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Thursday, 2 July 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.