Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



White Sox 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 White Sox Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 20 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.007)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Luisangel Acuña, actual: 1 6 5 2 0 0 1 5 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2983
Luisangel Acuña, projected: 1 6 5 2 0 0 1 5 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3078
Osvaldo Bido, actual: 5 40 33 8 0 0 2 14 5 6 26 0 0 2 0 0 1 966
Osvaldo Bido, projected: 5 40 35 9 2 0 1 14 4 6 26 0 1 1 0 0 1 907
Sean Burke, actual: 20 458 413 93 19 3 13 157 34 41 337 2 2 7 0 0 16 591
Sean Burke, projected: 20 461 410 96 22 2 16 168 42 49 337 1 2 5 4 0 14 713
Jonathan Cannon, actual: 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jonathan Cannon, projected: 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tyler Davis, actual: 24 106 89 17 2 0 2 25 15 14 79 0 2 0 1 2 2 476
Tyler Davis, projected: 24 107 90 17 2 0 2 25 15 14 79 0 2 0 1 2 2 473
Duncan Davitt, actual: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Duncan Davitt, projected: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Seranthony Domínguez, actual: 38 147 124 25 4 0 6 47 20 20 102 0 1 2 2 1 6 766
Seranthony Domínguez, projected: 38 148 130 27 4 0 4 44 16 16 102 0 1 2 1 1 5 644
Brandon Eisert, actual: 25 117 107 26 8 0 6 52 8 19 82 2 0 0 1 0 2 806
Brandon Eisert, projected: 25 118 105 28 7 1 5 50 10 16 82 1 1 1 1 2 3 888
Erick Fedde, actual: 20 405 362 95 14 1 16 159 35 49 279 0 3 3 1 1 8 831
Erick Fedde, projected: 20 408 362 97 19 1 14 161 37 53 279 2 3 2 2 2 11 834
Tyler Gilbert, actual: 4 22 18 7 3 0 2 16 4 7 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 2783
Tyler Gilbert, projected: 4 22 20 5 1 0 1 8 2 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 1175
Jordan Hicks, actual: 30 121 99 23 5 0 1 31 19 11 82 0 2 1 1 2 0 657
Jordan Hicks, projected: 30 122 104 25 4 1 2 36 14 15 82 0 1 2 1 0 2 740
Bryan Hudson, actual: 43 178 148 36 4 0 1 43 16 12 127 4 5 4 3 1 6 592
Bryan Hudson, projected: 43 179 154 31 6 0 4 49 17 14 127 2 3 3 2 1 4 573
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Anthony Kay, actual: 20 422 357 90 14 3 13 149 38 48 280 4 5 18 3 0 8 892
Anthony Kay, projected: 20 425 361 94 21 3 13 160 44 54 280 2 5 13 3 1 5 940
Jordan Leasure, actual: 18 78 69 15 2 0 6 35 8 14 56 0 1 0 0 1 2 856
Jordan Leasure, projected: 18 79 68 15 4 0 4 31 9 11 56 0 1 0 0 0 1 792
Davis Martin, actual: 19 440 400 102 27 0 6 147 33 39 318 1 2 4 1 0 7 577
Davis Martin, projected: 19 443 399 102 22 1 11 160 36 50 318 1 2 5 3 1 8 674
Reese McGuire, actual: 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reese McGuire, projected: 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Chris Murphy, actual: 22 102 87 21 3 1 2 32 12 12 69 0 1 2 1 0 1 774
Chris Murphy, projected: 22 103 89 20 4 0 2 32 11 11 69 0 1 2 1 0 1 685
Sean Newcomb, actual: 37 227 201 41 7 5 1 61 20 17 168 1 0 5 1 3 5 446
Sean Newcomb, projected: 37 229 198 48 8 1 5 75 26 25 168 1 1 3 1 1 3 652
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Doug Nikhazy, actual: 1 9 7 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 405
Doug Nikhazy, projected: 1 9 7 2 1 0 0 3 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
Jedixson Paez, actual: 3 16 12 4 0 0 2 10 3 6 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 2215
Jedixson Paez, projected: 3 16 12 4 0 0 2 10 3 6 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 2214
Trevor Richards, actual: 24 136 128 26 3 1 8 55 8 14 101 0 0 0 0 0 3 664
Trevor Richards, projected: 24 137 120 28 5 1 5 49 14 17 101 1 1 1 1 1 1 695
Joe Rock, actual: 4 53 40 11 1 0 0 12 11 5 31 0 0 2 0 0 0 978
Joe Rock, projected: 4 53 43 11 1 0 1 13 8 4 31 0 0 2 1 0 1 1013
David Sandlin, actual: 4 80 70 15 1 1 4 30 10 13 58 0 0 0 0 0 3 723
David Sandlin, projected: 4 81 71 15 1 1 4 30 10 13 58 0 0 0 0 0 3 729
Noah Schultz, actual: 11 231 192 43 10 2 8 81 29 34 159 3 1 6 3 0 4 789
Noah Schultz, projected: 11 233 193 43 10 2 8 82 29 34 159 3 1 6 3 0 4 781
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tyler Schweitzer, actual: 7 53 49 12 6 0 0 18 4 4 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 464
Tyler Schweitzer, projected: 7 53 49 12 6 0 0 18 4 4 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 463
Lucas Sims, actual: 9 46 35 9 2 0 1 14 7 7 30 2 1 1 0 0 0 825
Lucas Sims, projected: 9 46 38 8 2 0 1 15 6 6 30 0 0 1 0 0 1 666
Shane Smith, actual: 3 49 38 12 4 0 1 19 9 12 25 0 0 1 1 0 0 1841
Shane Smith, projected: 3 49 43 10 2 0 1 16 5 6 25 0 0 1 0 0 1 918
Grant Taylor, actual: 37 202 183 38 8 0 4 58 17 20 148 0 2 0 1 0 3 511
Grant Taylor, projected: 37 203 182 43 7 0 2 57 18 23 148 1 2 0 1 1 5 534
White Sox, Actual: 99 3753 3271 772 147 17 106 1271 372 427 2631 19 29 58 20 11 78 431
White Sox, Projected: 99 3779 3296 794 161 14 109 1313 384 453 2631 15 29 50 26 13 77 450


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.236 0.241
Slugging Average: 0.389 0.398
Walks (per PA): 0.099 0.102
SOs (per PA): 0.223 0.223
On-Base Average: 0.322 0.327
Power Factor: 1.646 1.654
OPS: 0.711 0.725
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 431
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 450
Actual Runs Scored: 427

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 22 July 2026, at 5:30 am Pacific Time.