Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Guardians 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Guardians Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.003)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Tanner Bibee, actual: 710 651 150 40 4 22 264 44 1 6 8 0 612
Tanner Bibee, projected: 712 650 150 36 2 19 248 49 1 6 7 0 586
Ben Lively, actual: 632 577 139 26 4 23 242 49 0 1 5 0 677
Ben Lively, projected: 634 577 152 31 4 25 266 47 1 2 8 0 786
Carlos Carrasco, actual: 447 406 112 26 5 19 205 33 1 2 5 0 888
Carlos Carrasco, projected: 448 411 105 23 2 14 174 29 1 3 4 0 693
Logan Allen, actual: 432 383 113 26 3 22 211 41 1 3 4 0 1043
Logan Allen, projected: 433 387 107 24 1 17 185 40 1 2 2 0 857
Pedro Avila, actual: 318 280 68 12 0 7 101 30 0 5 3 0 659
Pedro Avila, projected: 319 275 64 13 1 7 97 34 2 4 6 0 692
Gavin Williams, actual: 332 293 72 17 3 7 116 32 1 3 3 0 728
Gavin Williams, projected: 333 293 68 17 2 7 112 34 0 2 3 0 652
Triston McKenzie, actual: 340 288 69 10 1 19 138 49 0 1 1 1 953
Triston McKenzie, projected: 341 305 62 13 1 14 118 33 0 1 2 0 595
Cade Smith, actual: 289 268 51 19 1 1 75 17 0 1 3 0 298
Cade Smith, projected: 290 269 51 19 1 1 75 17 0 1 3 0 295
Hunter Gaddis, actual: 278 259 43 14 2 4 73 14 0 1 4 0 279
Hunter Gaddis, projected: 279 255 55 16 2 9 103 17 0 2 4 0 555
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Emmanuel Clase, actual: 270 253 39 6 0 2 51 10 2 3 2 0 188
Emmanuel Clase, projected: 271 254 49 8 0 3 66 13 1 2 1 0 330
Tim Herrin, actual: 257 225 39 9 0 2 54 25 1 1 5 0 323
Tim Herrin, projected: 258 224 46 9 0 3 65 25 2 1 5 0 443
Nick Sandlin, actual: 246 207 46 8 0 12 90 27 3 3 6 0 791
Nick Sandlin, projected: 247 211 40 8 0 9 74 28 2 2 5 0 591
Scott Barlow, actual: 241 204 44 11 0 6 73 31 0 2 4 0 714
Scott Barlow, projected: 242 212 48 10 1 5 75 24 1 2 3 0 611
Xzavion Curry, actual: 108 103 29 10 1 5 56 5 0 0 0 0 874
Xzavion Curry, projected: 108 99 26 7 1 4 45 7 0 1 1 0 771
Eli Morgan, actual: 167 152 30 7 1 4 51 11 2 1 1 0 476
Eli Morgan, projected: 168 154 36 8 0 7 65 11 1 1 1 0 661
Darren McCaughan, actual: 30 23 9 1 0 2 16 6 0 1 0 0 2194
Darren McCaughan, projected: 30 26 8 1 0 1 14 3 0 0 1 0 1090
Matthew Boyd, actual: 166 150 32 8 0 4 52 13 0 1 2 0 563
Matthew Boyd, projected: 167 150 38 8 1 7 68 13 1 1 2 0 787
Joey Cantillo, actual: 163 147 35 11 0 6 64 15 0 1 0 0 706
Joey Cantillo, projected: 164 147 35 11 0 6 64 15 0 1 0 0 702
Spencer Howard, actual: 30 27 11 0 0 3 20 3 0 0 0 0 2443
Spencer Howard, projected: 30 26 8 1 0 1 14 3 0 0 0 0 1051
Sam Hentges, actual: 91 85 18 6 0 3 33 5 0 0 0 1 454
Sam Hentges, projected: 91 83 21 4 0 2 31 8 0 0 0 0 656
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Alex Cobb, actual: 62 58 14 1 1 1 20 3 0 1 0 0 467
Alex Cobb, projected: 62 57 15 3 0 2 22 4 0 0 1 0 722
Tyler Beede, actual: 68 54 16 3 1 2 27 9 1 1 3 0 1333
Tyler Beede, projected: 68 60 17 3 0 2 27 7 0 0 1 0 909
Erik Sabrowski, actual: 47 43 6 1 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 172
Erik Sabrowski, projected: 47 43 6 1 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 172
Shane Bieber, actual: 45 44 10 4 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 303
Shane Bieber, projected: 45 42 10 2 0 1 16 2 0 0 0 0 460
Peter Strzelecki, actual: 47 43 11 3 0 1 17 3 0 0 1 0 554
Peter Strzelecki, projected: 47 41 9 3 0 1 14 4 0 1 1 0 648
Wes Parsons, actual: 15 15 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 280
Wes Parsons, projected: 15 12 4 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 1448
Andrew Walters, actual: 32 26 1 1 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 145
Andrew Walters, projected: 32 26 1 1 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 145
Connor Gillispie, actual: 32 26 4 2 0 0 6 5 0 1 0 0 431
Connor Gillispie, projected: 32 26 4 2 0 0 6 5 0 1 0 0 431
Anthony Gose, actual: 22 21 9 4 0 2 19 1 0 0 0 0 2086
Anthony Gose, projected: 22 19 4 2 0 1 9 3 0 0 0 0 763
Austin Hedges, actual: 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Austin Hedges, projected: 6 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 280
Guardians, Actual: 5923 5316 1224 286 27 179 2101 492 13 40 60 2 637
Guardians, Projected: 5941 5339 1240 284 19 169 2070 486 14 37 61 0 622
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.230 0.232
Slugging Average: 0.395 0.388
Walks (per PA): 0.083 0.082
SOs (per PA): 0.238 0.240
On-Base Average: 0.301 0.302
Power Factor: 1.717 1.669
OPS: 0.696 0.689
TPP Runs (to date): 621 624

Runs differential:
Actual Runs -3 less than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.