Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Guardians 2025 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Guardians Projected Pitching

Through games of Sunday, 28 September 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Kolby Allard, actual: 33 266 245 64 13 1 5 94 14 22 195 3 3 1 1 3 5 578
Kolby Allard, projected: 33 266 243 66 10 2 11 112 19 38 195 1 1 2 2 1 3 805
Logan Allen, actual: 30 676 600 157 31 0 18 242 62 84 470 2 5 6 8 1 8 749
Logan Allen, projected: 30 676 603 163 35 1 23 270 62 83 470 2 4 5 6 0 5 810
Tanner Bibee, actual: 31 762 692 170 24 5 27 285 54 93 547 3 3 10 5 1 17 696
Tanner Bibee, projected: 31 762 694 164 33 3 23 273 53 79 547 2 5 9 6 0 12 643
Cody Bolton, actual: 1 10 10 4 1 0 0 5 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1305
Cody Bolton, projected: 1 10 9 3 1 0 0 4 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Joey Cantillo, actual: 34 401 357 78 18 0 10 126 42 39 286 0 2 0 4 0 4 609
Joey Cantillo, projected: 34 401 358 80 21 0 11 135 41 43 286 0 2 0 4 0 4 634
Slade Cecconi, actual: 23 545 506 125 27 2 24 228 32 66 396 1 3 3 0 1 3 694
Slade Cecconi, projected: 23 545 506 134 32 2 24 242 29 75 396 1 4 5 1 1 5 768
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Emmanuel Clase, actual: 48 201 180 46 8 1 2 62 12 20 142 1 4 4 2 2 7 658
Emmanuel Clase, projected: 48 201 187 38 6 0 2 51 10 16 142 1 2 1 2 1 4 408
Nic Enright, actual: 27 127 113 24 3 0 3 36 12 8 93 0 0 2 0 0 3 518
Nic Enright, projected: 27 127 113 24 3 0 3 36 12 8 93 0 0 2 0 0 3 516
Matt Festa, actual: 63 226 199 44 6 1 4 64 15 29 164 4 3 5 2 2 8 551
Matt Festa, projected: 63 226 198 45 9 2 7 78 21 29 164 2 2 3 1 1 7 684
Hunter Gaddis, actual: 73 274 248 58 9 2 8 95 21 24 200 2 2 1 0 2 6 602
Hunter Gaddis, projected: 73 274 250 56 13 2 9 99 18 27 200 1 2 3 0 1 4 601
Austin Hedges, actual: 3 16 14 6 2 0 0 8 1 2 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 1919
Austin Hedges, projected: 3 16 14 5 1 0 0 7 1 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 864
Carlos Hernández, actual: 5 27 24 4 1 0 0 5 3 3 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 236
Carlos Hernández, projected: 5 27 23 6 1 0 1 10 3 4 21 0 0 0 0 0 1 745
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tim Herrin, actual: 54 194 155 37 8 0 5 60 30 23 128 0 3 6 2 2 6 888
Tim Herrin, projected: 54 194 164 36 7 0 3 53 23 20 128 1 2 4 1 1 5 627
Jakob Junis, actual: 57 274 249 64 11 2 5 94 18 24 200 1 2 4 0 2 5 586
Jakob Junis, projected: 57 274 251 67 13 1 10 112 16 34 200 1 2 4 1 1 4 742
Zak Kent, actual: 12 76 67 17 2 0 1 22 8 10 53 0 0 1 0 0 1 609
Zak Kent, projected: 12 76 67 17 2 0 1 22 8 10 53 0 0 1 0 0 1 608
Ben Lively, actual: 9 178 163 38 8 0 6 64 15 16 134 0 0 0 0 0 7 568
Ben Lively, projected: 9 178 162 42 9 1 7 74 13 21 134 0 1 2 1 0 3 738
Triston McKenzie, actual: 4 30 22 7 2 0 1 12 7 7 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 1610
Triston McKenzie, projected: 4 30 27 6 1 0 1 10 3 3 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 729
Parker Messick, actual: 7 165 159 46 7 0 4 65 6 12 119 0 0 0 1 0 0 648
Parker Messick, projected: 7 165 159 46 7 0 4 65 6 12 119 0 0 0 1 0 0 648
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Doug Nikhazy, actual: 2 23 17 5 2 1 0 9 6 6 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 1924
Doug Nikhazy, projected: 2 23 17 5 2 1 0 9 6 6 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 1944
Luis Ortiz, actual: 16 382 337 80 12 1 12 130 42 44 266 0 2 1 4 0 11 746
Luis Ortiz, projected: 16 382 337 80 13 2 11 131 39 43 266 0 4 3 4 1 6 739
Erik Sabrowski, actual: 33 121 97 14 4 0 2 24 21 8 88 0 0 3 0 0 5 456
Erik Sabrowski, projected: 33 121 101 14 4 0 1 22 18 6 88 0 0 2 0 0 5 349
Paul Sewald, actual: 18 62 57 14 2 0 3 25 4 9 46 0 1 0 0 0 3 705
Paul Sewald, projected: 18 62 56 12 3 0 2 22 5 7 46 0 0 1 0 1 1 558
Cade Smith, actual: 76 300 274 55 21 1 4 90 19 31 221 1 2 4 1 3 1 453
Cade Smith, projected: 76 300 276 54 20 1 3 84 18 24 221 1 2 4 1 2 3 399
Andrew Walters, actual: 2 6 6 2 1 0 1 6 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1656
Andrew Walters, projected: 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Gavin Williams, actual: 31 704 615 130 23 1 23 224 83 62 503 1 2 3 4 0 7 626
Gavin Williams, projected: 31 704 617 137 29 3 19 230 78 69 503 1 4 5 4 1 9 648
Will Wilson, actual: 1 8 8 2 1 0 1 6 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 999
Will Wilson, projected: 1 8 8 2 1 0 1 6 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Guardians, Actual: 162 6054 5414 1291 247 18 169 2081 527 649 4326 19 39 54 34 19 108 654
Guardians, Projected: 162 6054 5445 1302 276 21 177 2158 504 662 4326 14 37 56 35 12 86 664


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.238 0.239
Slugging Average: 0.384 0.396
Walks (per PA): 0.087 0.083
SOs (per PA): 0.228 0.231
On-Base Average: 0.310 0.308
Power Factor: 1.612 1.657
OPS: 0.695 0.705
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 654
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 664
Actual Runs Scored: 649

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 29 September 2025, at 12:00 pm Pacific Time.