Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Diamondbacks 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Diamondbacks Projected Pitching

Through games of Wednesday, 1 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.995)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Philip Abner, actual: 3 29 25 7 1 0 2 14 4 7 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1111
Philip Abner, projected: 3 29 25 7 2 0 1 13 4 6 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1026
Mitch Bratt, actual: 1 13 11 2 1 0 0 3 2 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 552
Mitch Bratt, projected: 1 13 11 2 1 0 0 3 2 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 486
Juan Burgos, actual: 1 6 6 2 1 0 0 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 883
Juan Burgos, projected: 1 6 5 2 1 0 0 3 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
José Cabrera, actual: 2 41 38 10 2 0 2 18 2 4 30 0 0 1 0 0 0 707
José Cabrera, projected: 2 41 38 10 2 0 2 18 2 4 30 0 0 1 0 0 0 729
Taylor Clarke, actual: 38 141 126 22 4 1 3 37 8 10 112 1 3 3 0 1 0 353
Taylor Clarke, projected: 38 140 127 32 6 1 6 57 10 18 112 0 1 1 1 1 1 669
Adrian Del Castillo, actual: 1 10 9 4 0 0 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1971
Adrian Del Castillo, projected: 1 10 9 4 0 0 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1944
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Yilber Díaz, actual: 1 10 9 7 1 1 1 13 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 19108
Yilber Díaz, projected: 1 10 9 3 1 0 0 4 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3402
Zac Gallen, actual: 18 414 378 116 18 4 17 193 28 70 276 1 3 4 2 1 5 1024
Zac Gallen, projected: 18 412 374 87 18 2 12 145 32 45 276 1 2 4 2 0 6 675
Brandyn Garcia, actual: 23 72 63 10 0 0 0 10 5 5 58 1 0 3 1 1 0 172
Brandyn Garcia, projected: 23 72 62 15 2 0 0 16 7 9 58 1 0 2 1 1 1 387
Kevin Ginkel, actual: 35 132 120 28 8 0 4 48 11 12 97 0 1 0 0 1 4 607
Kevin Ginkel, projected: 35 131 117 28 7 0 3 45 12 16 97 0 1 1 1 0 2 625
Andrew Hoffmann, actual: 8 59 48 16 3 0 3 28 8 12 35 0 1 1 2 0 0 1595
Andrew Hoffmann, projected: 8 59 48 15 4 0 2 26 9 12 35 0 0 0 2 0 0 1397
Drey Jameson, actual: 7 50 43 11 2 1 1 18 6 6 34 0 0 1 0 0 1 807
Drey Jameson, projected: 7 50 44 11 2 0 1 18 5 4 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 602
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Merrill Kelly, actual: 14 362 321 92 17 3 18 169 33 53 245 1 4 2 0 2 6 996
Merrill Kelly, projected: 14 360 329 80 17 2 12 136 27 40 245 1 2 2 2 1 5 706
Jonathan Loáisiga, actual: 35 126 113 27 6 0 1 36 7 10 95 2 3 1 0 2 4 450
Jonathan Loáisiga, projected: 35 125 113 27 5 0 3 41 9 13 95 1 1 1 1 1 2 583
James McCann, actual: 4 23 19 9 2 0 1 14 3 6 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 2724
James McCann, projected: 4 23 20 9 2 0 1 15 2 6 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 2633
Juan Morillo, actual: 36 135 117 22 3 1 2 33 13 12 97 1 2 2 2 1 1 514
Juan Morillo, projected: 36 134 115 28 5 1 2 41 15 15 97 1 1 1 1 0 1 635
Ryne Nelson, actual: 15 355 325 81 16 2 18 155 22 53 250 0 2 5 3 1 0 816
Ryne Nelson, projected: 15 353 324 81 18 5 12 145 23 43 250 0 3 2 1 1 1 724
Brandon Pfaadt, actual: 14 190 166 43 10 1 8 79 18 29 130 0 3 3 1 0 0 890
Brandon Pfaadt, projected: 14 189 174 47 10 1 7 81 11 27 130 0 2 2 1 0 2 833
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Taylor Rashi, actual: 3 15 14 3 0 0 1 6 1 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 698
Taylor Rashi, projected: 3 15 13 3 1 0 0 4 2 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 540
Eduardo Rodríguez, actual: 17 414 375 82 20 2 9 133 38 27 306 1 0 0 2 0 6 523
Eduardo Rodríguez, projected: 17 412 372 94 19 1 12 152 34 46 306 1 2 2 3 1 3 667
Joe Ross, actual: 3 22 18 7 2 0 1 12 4 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2283
Joe Ross, projected: 3 22 20 5 1 0 1 8 2 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
Paul Sewald, actual: 33 119 108 20 4 1 6 44 8 16 90 1 1 1 0 0 2 585
Paul Sewald, projected: 33 118 106 23 5 0 4 42 9 14 90 1 1 1 0 1 2 574
Michael Soroka, actual: 15 333 309 72 17 2 6 111 17 28 246 1 1 5 1 0 10 538
Michael Soroka, projected: 15 331 298 70 13 1 9 112 25 36 246 1 1 6 2 0 6 605
Kade Strowd, actual: 1 7 4 1 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900
Kade Strowd, projected: 1 7 6 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Ryan Thompson, actual: 34 124 114 29 9 0 2 44 8 10 88 0 1 1 1 1 4 660
Ryan Thompson, projected: 34 123 113 27 5 1 3 42 8 13 88 0 0 1 1 1 5 634
Ildemaro Vargas, actual: 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 101
Ildemaro Vargas, projected: 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 162
Diamondbacks, Actual: 86 3208 2883 723 147 19 106 1226 252 393 2270 10 26 34 16 11 44 387
Diamondbacks, Projected: 86 3191 2876 711 147 15 93 1172 255 377 2270 8 18 28 20 8 38 365


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.251 0.247
Slugging Average: 0.425 0.408
Walks (per PA): 0.079 0.080
SOs (per PA): 0.181 0.221
On-Base Average: 0.316 0.313
Power Factor: 1.696 1.648
OPS: 0.741 0.720
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 387
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 365
Actual Runs Scored: 393

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Thursday, 2 July 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.