Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Diamondbacks 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Diamondbacks Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 20 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.998)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Philip Abner, actual: 5 41 35 8 1 0 2 15 6 7 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 805
Philip Abner, projected: 5 41 35 9 2 0 1 15 6 6 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 778
Mitch Bratt, actual: 3 51 44 13 2 0 3 24 6 6 32 0 0 1 0 0 1 1233
Mitch Bratt, projected: 3 51 44 13 2 0 3 24 6 6 32 0 0 1 0 0 1 1242
Juan Burgos, actual: 2 12 10 3 1 0 0 4 0 1 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 611
Juan Burgos, projected: 2 12 10 3 1 0 0 5 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
José Cabrera, actual: 4 81 72 20 3 0 3 32 7 11 53 0 0 2 0 0 4 984
José Cabrera, projected: 4 81 72 20 3 0 3 32 7 11 53 0 0 2 0 0 4 972
Taylor Clarke, actual: 44 169 153 30 5 1 4 49 9 14 132 1 3 3 0 1 0 404
Taylor Clarke, projected: 44 169 153 38 8 1 7 69 12 22 132 0 2 1 1 1 1 677
Adrian Del Castillo, actual: 1 10 9 4 0 0 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1971
Adrian Del Castillo, projected: 1 10 9 4 0 0 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1944
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Yilber Díaz, actual: 1 10 9 7 1 1 1 13 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 19108
Yilber Díaz, projected: 1 10 9 3 1 0 0 4 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3402
Zac Gallen, actual: 19 440 401 122 19 4 18 203 31 74 294 1 3 4 2 1 7 1014
Zac Gallen, projected: 19 439 399 93 19 2 13 155 34 48 294 1 2 4 2 0 6 682
Brandyn Garcia, actual: 31 94 84 13 1 0 0 14 6 5 77 1 0 3 1 1 0 153
Brandyn Garcia, projected: 31 94 83 18 2 0 0 21 8 10 77 1 0 2 1 1 1 308
Kevin Ginkel, actual: 44 165 152 36 9 0 4 57 12 16 123 0 1 0 0 1 5 546
Kevin Ginkel, projected: 44 165 147 35 9 0 4 56 14 20 123 0 1 1 1 1 3 600
Andrew Hoffmann, actual: 8 59 48 16 3 0 3 28 8 12 35 0 1 1 2 0 0 1595
Andrew Hoffmann, projected: 8 59 49 15 4 0 2 26 9 12 35 0 0 0 2 0 0 1397
Drey Jameson, actual: 11 76 66 16 3 1 1 24 9 9 52 0 0 1 0 0 1 692
Drey Jameson, projected: 11 76 67 17 3 0 2 26 8 6 52 0 0 1 0 0 1 677
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Merrill Kelly, actual: 17 432 384 107 20 3 21 196 40 59 296 1 4 2 1 2 6 938
Merrill Kelly, projected: 17 431 394 96 20 2 14 162 32 48 296 1 2 2 2 1 6 686
Jonathan Loáisiga, actual: 42 153 138 31 6 0 1 40 9 10 117 2 3 1 1 2 4 398
Jonathan Loáisiga, projected: 42 153 137 33 5 0 4 49 11 15 117 1 1 2 1 1 2 567
James McCann, actual: 4 23 19 9 2 0 1 14 3 6 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 2724
James McCann, projected: 4 23 20 9 2 0 1 15 2 6 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 2633
Juan Morillo, actual: 43 162 141 28 5 1 2 41 15 15 119 1 3 2 2 1 1 485
Juan Morillo, projected: 43 162 139 34 6 2 2 49 18 18 119 2 2 2 2 1 1 625
Ryne Nelson, actual: 15 355 325 81 16 2 18 155 22 53 250 0 2 5 3 1 0 816
Ryne Nelson, projected: 15 354 325 82 18 5 12 145 23 43 250 0 3 2 1 1 1 724
Brandon Pfaadt, actual: 17 254 229 59 11 1 8 96 18 33 177 0 3 4 1 0 0 756
Brandon Pfaadt, projected: 17 254 234 63 14 1 9 107 14 35 177 0 2 3 1 0 3 791
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Taylor Rashi, actual: 3 15 14 3 0 0 1 6 1 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 698
Taylor Rashi, projected: 3 15 13 3 1 0 0 4 2 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 540
Eduardo Rodríguez, actual: 20 478 435 101 23 3 12 166 41 36 350 2 0 0 2 0 6 575
Eduardo Rodríguez, projected: 20 477 431 109 22 2 14 176 39 53 350 2 3 3 3 1 3 680
Joe Ross, actual: 3 22 18 7 2 0 1 12 4 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2283
Joe Ross, projected: 3 22 20 5 1 0 1 8 2 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
Paul Sewald, actual: 39 141 128 25 4 1 8 55 9 19 106 1 2 1 0 0 2 640
Paul Sewald, projected: 39 141 126 27 6 0 5 50 11 17 106 1 1 1 0 1 2 577
Michael Soroka, actual: 15 333 309 72 17 2 6 111 17 28 246 1 1 5 1 0 10 538
Michael Soroka, projected: 15 332 299 70 13 1 9 113 25 36 246 1 1 6 2 0 6 605
Kade Strowd, actual: 1 7 4 1 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900
Kade Strowd, projected: 1 7 6 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Ryan Thompson, actual: 40 153 138 35 9 0 2 50 10 14 107 1 1 3 1 2 5 647
Ryan Thompson, projected: 40 153 140 34 7 1 3 52 10 17 107 1 0 2 1 1 6 632
Ildemaro Vargas, actual: 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 101
Ildemaro Vargas, projected: 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 162
Diamondbacks, Actual: 100 3742 3369 847 163 20 120 1410 289 449 2651 13 28 40 18 12 52 443
Diamondbacks, Projected: 100 3737 3365 834 169 17 109 1368 298 439 2651 11 21 36 21 10 47 426


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.251 0.248
Slugging Average: 0.419 0.407
Walks (per PA): 0.077 0.080
SOs (per PA): 0.182 0.219
On-Base Average: 0.316 0.314
Power Factor: 1.665 1.640
OPS: 0.734 0.721
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 443
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 426
Actual Runs Scored: 449

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 22 July 2026, at 5:30 am Pacific Time.