Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Orioles 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Orioles Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.002)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Corbin Burnes, actual: 784 731 165 21 1 22 254 48 0 3 2 0 547
Corbin Burnes, projected: 786 719 152 22 3 21 243 55 1 3 8 0 514
Zach Eflin, actual: 224 213 51 3 0 8 78 11 0 0 0 0 544
Zach Eflin, projected: 224 209 55 12 1 8 91 11 1 1 2 0 711
Albert Suárez, actual: 565 510 130 34 1 17 217 43 4 5 3 0 703
Albert Suárez, projected: 566 510 130 38 3 17 225 43 4 5 4 0 714
Dean Kremer, actual: 553 493 110 19 0 18 183 51 1 5 3 0 648
Dean Kremer, projected: 554 500 126 24 1 19 208 46 1 3 4 0 717
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Trevor Rogers, actual: 90 74 25 7 0 2 38 10 1 4 1 0 1412
Trevor Rogers, projected: 90 80 21 6 0 2 33 8 0 1 1 0 806
Grayson Rodriguez, actual: 491 449 109 24 2 15 182 36 0 1 5 0 654
Grayson Rodriguez, projected: 492 448 113 21 3 15 184 38 0 2 3 0 686
Cole Irvin, actual: 470 434 126 27 5 17 214 25 1 5 5 0 887
Cole Irvin, projected: 471 434 118 22 2 16 191 26 1 3 6 0 756
Cade Povich, actual: 352 313 80 22 2 12 142 34 0 2 3 0 837
Cade Povich, projected: 353 314 80 22 2 12 142 34 0 2 3 0 831
Keegan Akin, actual: 313 285 55 13 2 9 99 19 2 5 2 0 479
Keegan Akin, projected: 314 284 72 15 1 10 119 23 1 4 1 0 706
Yennier Cano, actual: 249 223 54 9 1 6 83 24 0 1 1 0 624
Yennier Cano, projected: 250 225 56 12 0 5 84 21 0 1 2 0 602
Seranthony Domínguez, actual: 98 88 20 2 0 6 40 9 0 1 0 0 807
Seranthony Domínguez, projected: 98 87 18 3 0 3 30 9 0 0 1 0 577
Mike Baumann, actual: 82 72 18 4 0 2 28 9 0 0 1 0 775
Mike Baumann, projected: 82 72 19 4 1 2 31 8 0 1 1 0 861
Jacob Webb, actual: 237 208 40 11 0 4 63 27 0 1 1 0 501
Jacob Webb, projected: 238 207 44 10 1 5 73 26 1 1 2 0 576
Burch Smith, actual: 106 101 25 7 0 5 47 3 1 0 1 0 635
Burch Smith, projected: 106 95 26 5 0 4 44 10 1 1 1 0 894
Cionel Pérez, actual: 238 203 47 12 2 0 63 28 1 1 5 0 613
Cionel Pérez, projected: 239 206 49 8 1 4 70 28 1 2 3 0 686
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Gregory Soto, actual: 79 70 20 3 1 2 31 7 0 0 2 0 877
Gregory Soto, projected: 79 68 16 3 0 2 25 10 0 1 1 0 777
Craig Kimbrel, actual: 232 192 40 7 1 7 70 31 1 3 5 0 792
Craig Kimbrel, projected: 233 204 34 6 1 5 57 24 1 1 3 0 422
Yohan Ramírez, actual: 24 19 3 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 0 300
Yohan Ramírez, projected: 24 20 5 1 0 1 7 3 0 0 1 0 882
Kyle Bradish, actual: 163 144 27 6 2 2 43 15 0 0 3 1 450
Kyle Bradish, projected: 163 147 34 6 0 4 53 13 0 1 2 0 555
Thyago Vieira, actual: 5 1 1 0 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0
Thyago Vieira, projected: 5 4 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 755
Dillon Tate, actual: 148 134 38 7 0 2 51 9 0 1 4 0 768
Dillon Tate, projected: 148 131 31 7 0 3 47 11 0 2 4 0 622
Matt Bowman, actual: 66 60 15 2 0 2 23 6 0 0 0 0 658
Matt Bowman, projected: 66 59 14 3 0 1 22 6 0 1 1 0 640
Danny Coulombe, actual: 107 102 15 3 0 3 27 5 0 0 0 0 257
Danny Coulombe, projected: 107 96 22 4 0 3 35 9 0 1 1 0 603
Bryan Baker, actual: 93 85 20 6 1 3 37 7 0 1 0 0 645
Bryan Baker, projected: 93 82 19 4 0 2 28 9 0 1 1 0 570
John Means, actual: 80 76 16 4 1 2 28 2 0 1 1 0 443
John Means, projected: 80 75 17 3 0 4 31 4 0 0 1 0 611
Tyler Wells, actual: 67 64 18 4 1 3 33 3 0 0 0 0 868
Tyler Wells, projected: 67 62 13 2 0 3 25 4 0 0 0 0 547
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Nick Vespi, actual: 49 45 10 4 0 1 17 3 0 1 0 0 500
Nick Vespi, projected: 49 45 12 4 0 2 22 3 0 0 0 0 709
Vinny Nittoli, actual: 14 14 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 129
Vinny Nittoli, projected: 14 13 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 428
Colin Selby, actual: 15 12 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 139
Colin Selby, projected: 15 13 3 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 497
Jonathan Heasley, actual: 29 25 10 0 0 2 16 3 0 0 1 0 2042
Jonathan Heasley, projected: 29 26 7 1 0 1 13 3 0 0 0 0 827
Tucker Davidson, actual: 19 17 4 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 378
Tucker Davidson, projected: 19 16 4 1 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 961
Chayce McDermott, actual: 18 15 5 0 0 1 8 2 0 1 0 0 1330
Chayce McDermott, projected: 18 15 5 0 0 1 8 2 0 1 0 0 1330
Matt Krook, actual: 6 5 1 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 2108
Matt Krook, projected: 6 5 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2247
James McCann, actual: 5 5 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 2107
James McCann, projected: 5 5 2 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2238
Orioles, Actual: 6071 5482 1303 262 24 175 2138 481 12 42 53 1 659
Orioles, Projected: 6083 5476 1323 271 20 177 2166 494 13 39 57 0 662
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.238 0.242
Slugging Average: 0.390 0.396
Walks (per PA): 0.079 0.081
SOs (per PA): 0.227 0.231
On-Base Average: 0.303 0.309
Power Factor: 1.641 1.637
OPS: 0.693 0.704
TPP Runs (to date): 699 672

Runs differential:
Actual Runs 27 greater than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.