Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Orioles 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Orioles Projected Pitching

Through games of Wednesday, 1 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.991)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Keegan Akin, actual: 24 114 102 29 3 2 3 45 9 18 76 1 2 0 1 0 0 928
Keegan Akin, projected: 24 113 101 25 5 1 4 43 9 15 76 0 1 0 1 0 0 790
Chris Bassitt, actual: 12 261 228 70 14 0 6 102 22 34 169 0 3 8 1 0 5 1013
Chris Bassitt, projected: 12 259 232 57 11 1 7 90 20 27 169 0 1 5 2 0 4 743
Shane Baz, actual: 17 434 382 99 32 1 9 160 39 53 303 0 10 3 2 1 6 760
Shane Baz, projected: 17 430 383 92 21 1 14 155 37 50 303 0 4 4 2 0 8 705
Kyle Bradish, actual: 17 400 351 88 17 2 11 142 47 45 279 0 1 1 2 1 3 722
Kyle Bradish, projected: 17 396 355 82 15 1 10 129 34 40 279 1 1 4 2 0 1 600
Yennier Cano, actual: 37 110 101 20 5 0 1 28 7 11 81 0 1 1 3 0 3 478
Yennier Cano, projected: 37 109 98 24 5 0 2 36 9 12 81 0 1 1 0 0 3 591
Zach Eflin, actual: 1 17 15 4 1 0 1 8 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1076
Zach Eflin, projected: 1 17 16 4 1 0 1 7 1 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Dietrich Enns, actual: 13 70 55 13 5 0 0 18 11 8 48 1 3 0 0 0 2 707
Dietrich Enns, projected: 13 69 62 16 3 0 2 25 6 8 48 0 1 0 1 1 1 735
Jose Espada, actual: 1 4 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 748
Jose Espada, projected: 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
Cameron Foster, actual: 6 49 41 17 2 0 1 22 8 10 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1714
Cameron Foster, projected: 6 49 41 17 2 0 1 22 8 10 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1701
Rico Garcia, actual: 39 135 124 19 5 0 5 39 11 12 107 0 0 0 1 1 2 395
Rico Garcia, projected: 39 134 121 30 6 0 6 55 12 16 107 0 1 0 0 1 1 665
Trey Gibson, actual: 8 161 134 38 5 0 7 64 25 27 99 0 1 1 2 0 0 1195
Trey Gibson, projected: 8 159 133 38 5 0 7 63 25 27 99 0 1 1 2 0 0 1215
Ryan Helsley, actual: 17 68 59 13 2 0 3 24 9 9 46 0 0 0 1 1 0 795
Ryan Helsley, projected: 17 67 60 12 2 0 2 20 7 6 46 0 1 0 0 1 1 591
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Yaramil Hiraldo, actual: 3 12 8 3 0 0 2 9 4 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 4225
Yaramil Hiraldo, projected: 3 12 10 2 0 0 1 5 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1620
Andrew Kittredge, actual: 25 94 87 24 2 0 4 38 6 15 63 0 1 0 2 1 8 1020
Andrew Kittredge, projected: 25 93 86 21 4 0 3 34 6 10 63 0 1 0 1 1 2 687
Dean Kremer, actual: 3 65 62 12 2 0 5 29 3 8 51 0 0 0 1 0 1 638
Dean Kremer, projected: 3 64 59 15 3 0 2 24 5 8 51 0 0 0 0 0 1 594
Anthony Nunez, actual: 32 148 131 30 6 1 5 53 14 23 103 2 0 1 3 1 2 731
Anthony Nunez, projected: 32 147 130 30 6 1 5 53 14 23 103 2 0 1 3 1 2 734
Cade Povich, actual: 4 82 74 19 4 0 4 35 7 11 58 0 0 1 0 0 0 777
Cade Povich, projected: 4 81 73 20 4 1 3 34 7 11 58 0 1 0 1 0 1 851
Nick Raquet, actual: 3 14 11 3 1 0 1 7 2 3 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1589
Nick Raquet, projected: 3 14 11 2 1 0 1 5 2 2 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1188
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Trevor Rogers, actual: 15 337 310 80 19 2 9 130 24 46 238 0 2 1 5 0 7 744
Trevor Rogers, projected: 15 334 298 73 18 1 7 116 29 37 238 1 3 3 3 1 6 670
Albert Suárez, actual: 15 163 149 36 10 1 7 69 13 21 119 0 1 0 0 0 1 695
Albert Suárez, projected: 15 161 146 37 10 1 5 64 12 18 119 1 1 1 0 1 2 670
Lou Trivino, actual: 2 18 15 6 1 1 0 9 3 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 2537
Lou Trivino, projected: 2 18 16 4 1 0 0 6 2 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 648
Josh Walker, actual: 5 25 23 5 1 0 1 9 2 3 18 0 0 0 1 0 0 688
Josh Walker, projected: 5 25 22 6 1 0 1 10 3 4 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 875
Tyler Wells, actual: 30 158 145 33 7 1 5 57 9 17 119 1 2 1 0 0 1 549
Tyler Wells, projected: 30 157 145 31 6 1 7 59 10 18 119 0 1 1 1 0 2 599
Cameron Weston, actual: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cameron Weston, projected: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Weston Wilson, actual: 3 13 13 6 0 0 2 12 0 4 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 2904
Weston Wilson, projected: 3 13 13 5 0 0 2 10 0 3 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 2322
Grant Wolfram, actual: 31 110 102 29 9 2 0 42 3 14 75 1 0 4 2 1 0 744
Grant Wolfram, projected: 31 109 98 29 8 1 1 41 8 15 75 0 0 2 1 1 1 867
Brandon Young, actual: 13 311 277 67 12 0 7 100 27 33 217 1 4 1 2 0 3 676
Brandon Young, projected: 13 308 275 73 16 0 10 120 27 41 217 2 3 1 2 0 2 785
Orioles, Actual: 88 3376 3005 765 165 13 99 1253 308 436 2342 7 31 24 30 7 46 419
Orioles, Projected: 88 3345 2990 746 154 10 104 1227 296 407 2342 7 22 25 23 8 38 398


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.255 0.249
Slugging Average: 0.417 0.410
Walks (per PA): 0.091 0.088
SOs (per PA): 0.209 0.223
On-Base Average: 0.326 0.320
Power Factor: 1.638 1.645
OPS: 0.743 0.730
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 419
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 398
Actual Runs Scored: 436

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Thursday, 2 July 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.