Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Red Sox 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Red Sox Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 10 August 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.001)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Jack Anderson, actual: 3 32 30 8 1 0 1 12 2 3 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 562
Jack Anderson, projected: 3 32 30 7 1 0 1 10 2 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Brayan Bello, actual: 18 366 331 93 15 1 11 143 27 50 251 1 4 3 2 2 8 835
Brayan Bello, projected: 18 366 328 86 17 1 10 133 30 43 251 1 3 5 4 0 7 783
Jake Bennett, actual: 13 305 280 64 9 0 5 88 16 27 230 3 3 3 0 2 9 452
Jake Bennett, projected: 13 305 280 64 9 0 5 88 16 27 230 3 3 3 0 2 9 449
Raymond Burgos, actual: 2 20 20 2 0 0 2 8 0 2 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 483
Raymond Burgos, projected: 2 20 19 4 0 0 1 8 1 2 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 405
Aroldis Chapman, actual: 41 168 148 31 9 1 2 48 18 11 119 1 0 1 1 0 8 580
Aroldis Chapman, projected: 41 168 145 24 5 0 3 38 20 13 119 0 1 2 1 0 4 470
Danny Coulombe, actual: 29 96 80 18 1 0 1 22 15 11 66 0 0 1 0 0 1 570
Danny Coulombe, projected: 29 96 86 19 4 0 2 30 9 9 66 0 0 0 1 0 2 575
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Garrett Crochet, actual: 6 138 122 33 9 0 5 57 11 23 90 1 0 4 2 0 0 958
Garrett Crochet, projected: 6 138 126 28 5 0 4 45 10 13 90 0 1 1 1 0 3 648
Connelly Early, actual: 17 390 344 81 12 0 15 138 34 35 275 1 2 9 2 0 8 723
Connelly Early, projected: 17 390 348 82 11 0 12 130 32 34 275 1 2 8 2 0 7 667
Alec Gamboa, actual: 7 52 46 10 3 0 1 16 5 3 39 0 1 0 0 0 1 512
Alec Gamboa, projected: 7 52 46 10 3 0 1 16 5 3 39 0 1 0 0 0 1 509
Sonny Gray, actual: 22 510 469 112 27 1 13 180 33 40 377 0 3 5 3 0 12 583
Sonny Gray, projected: 22 511 463 108 20 2 12 169 39 53 377 1 3 4 4 0 8 589
Tayron Guerrero, actual: 29 120 115 25 3 0 2 34 3 10 90 0 0 2 0 0 1 413
Tayron Guerrero, projected: 29 120 103 26 5 0 3 41 14 17 90 0 1 2 1 0 1 743
Tommy Kahnle, actual: 8 43 37 12 4 0 2 22 6 8 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 1253
Tommy Kahnle, projected: 8 43 37 8 2 0 1 13 5 5 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 648
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Zack Kelly, actual: 17 71 60 14 1 0 1 18 7 8 49 1 2 1 1 0 1 668
Zack Kelly, projected: 17 71 62 14 3 0 2 24 7 9 49 0 1 1 1 1 2 743
Joe La Sorsa, actual: 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4343
Joe La Sorsa, projected: 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Erik Miller, actual: 3 15 13 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 527
Erik Miller, projected: 3 15 13 3 1 0 0 4 2 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Jovani Morán, actual: 36 201 175 28 6 1 6 54 22 14 150 1 2 1 3 1 3 496
Jovani Morán, projected: 36 201 173 34 6 2 3 52 26 21 150 1 1 0 1 1 3 509
Johan Oviedo, actual: 1 18 15 6 2 0 2 14 1 4 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 1987
Johan Oviedo, projected: 1 18 16 4 1 0 0 6 2 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 648
Eduardo Rivera, actual: 4 44 38 8 2 0 1 13 6 7 30 0 0 0 0 0 1 664
Eduardo Rivera, projected: 4 44 38 8 2 0 1 13 6 7 30 0 0 0 0 0 1 648
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tyler Samaniego, actual: 20 90 77 22 2 0 1 27 8 8 61 2 1 2 1 0 1 728
Tyler Samaniego, projected: 20 90 77 22 2 0 1 27 8 8 61 2 1 2 1 0 1 729
Patrick Sandoval, actual: 5 109 97 30 6 0 3 45 10 10 72 0 1 1 1 0 2 991
Patrick Sandoval, projected: 5 109 96 24 4 0 3 37 11 13 72 0 1 1 1 0 1 778
Justin Slaten, actual: 35 133 124 35 6 0 4 53 7 20 91 2 0 0 1 0 7 830
Justin Slaten, projected: 35 133 124 29 4 0 3 43 7 16 91 1 1 1 1 1 3 592
Ranger Suárez, actual: 20 424 388 91 20 1 6 131 30 41 309 0 3 3 2 0 5 533
Ranger Suárez, projected: 20 424 386 96 19 1 9 145 32 42 309 2 2 3 3 1 3 608
Payton Tolle, actual: 19 435 401 89 21 1 13 151 29 42 321 1 1 3 3 1 4 561
Payton Tolle, projected: 19 435 399 92 20 1 15 159 32 46 321 1 2 3 3 1 6 631
Tyler Uberstine, actual: 1 11 10 3 1 0 1 7 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 990
Tyler Uberstine, projected: 1 11 10 3 1 0 1 7 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Ryan Watson, actual: 35 240 215 54 11 2 8 93 19 28 167 2 1 3 0 0 3 755
Ryan Watson, projected: 35 240 216 55 11 2 8 93 19 28 167 2 1 3 0 0 3 773
Greg Weissert, actual: 48 191 173 42 6 0 7 69 14 21 136 0 1 2 0 1 3 682
Greg Weissert, projected: 48 191 172 42 7 0 5 65 15 21 136 1 2 2 1 1 5 655
Garrett Whitlock, actual: 45 168 158 32 6 0 3 47 7 12 132 1 2 0 0 0 3 363
Garrett Whitlock, projected: 45 168 155 36 7 0 4 56 10 16 132 0 1 2 1 0 3 515
Red Sox, Actual: 118 4392 3968 947 183 8 117 1497 332 441 3154 17 28 46 22 7 81 460
Red Sox, Projected: 118 4393 3950 928 170 9 110 1453 361 452 3154 16 28 43 27 8 73 452


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.239 0.235
Slugging Average: 0.377 0.368
Walks (per PA): 0.076 0.082
SOs (per PA): 0.232 0.242
On-Base Average: 0.303 0.304
Power Factor: 1.581 1.566
OPS: 0.680 0.672
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 460
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 452
Actual Runs Scored: 441

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 11 August 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.