Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Red Sox 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Red Sox Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.003)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Kutter Crawford, actual: 759 695 155 30 2 34 291 51 1 3 9 0 653
Kutter Crawford, projected: 761 694 162 36 2 30 292 55 0 4 7 0 673
Tanner Houck, actual: 743 674 156 27 0 11 216 48 0 4 16 1 524
Tanner Houck, projected: 745 666 154 28 0 14 223 58 2 4 14 0 558
Brayan Bello, actual: 702 622 157 31 0 19 245 64 0 5 11 0 737
Brayan Bello, projected: 704 632 171 36 2 19 267 58 0 5 8 0 804
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Nick Pivetta, actual: 595 554 128 23 4 28 243 36 0 4 1 0 666
Nick Pivetta, projected: 597 534 133 27 3 24 236 51 2 4 4 0 761
James Paxton, actual: 47 45 13 1 1 1 19 2 0 0 0 0 757
James Paxton, projected: 47 43 10 2 0 1 17 4 0 0 0 0 523
Cooper Criswell, actual: 424 377 103 22 2 10 159 31 1 8 7 0 785
Cooper Criswell, projected: 425 380 107 23 2 11 169 31 1 6 8 0 842
Josh Winckowski, actual: 336 298 81 15 0 10 126 26 4 4 4 0 805
Josh Winckowski, projected: 337 302 84 15 2 10 131 28 1 3 3 0 839
Greg Weissert, actual: 263 237 65 9 0 7 95 20 1 5 0 0 706
Greg Weissert, projected: 264 235 61 8 0 7 91 22 1 3 2 0 697
Luis García, actual: 72 71 24 8 0 4 44 1 0 0 0 0 1214
Luis García, projected: 72 64 16 3 0 2 24 7 0 0 1 0 746
Chase Anderson, actual: 224 199 46 7 0 10 83 19 1 2 3 0 744
Chase Anderson, projected: 225 201 51 10 1 9 90 18 1 1 3 0 750
Zack Kelly, actual: 241 212 44 8 0 10 82 27 0 0 2 0 666
Zack Kelly, projected: 242 210 46 11 0 8 82 27 0 1 3 1 695
Justin Slaten, actual: 224 211 47 6 1 4 67 9 0 2 2 0 485
Justin Slaten, projected: 225 212 47 6 1 4 67 9 0 2 2 0 480
Kenley Jansen, actual: 218 194 38 9 0 4 59 20 0 3 1 0 470
Kenley Jansen, projected: 219 198 36 7 1 5 60 17 0 1 2 0 432
Brennan Bernardino, actual: 226 195 50 9 1 6 79 22 1 2 6 0 782
Brennan Bernardino, projected: 227 198 50 9 1 5 77 21 0 1 6 0 702
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Quinn Priester, actual: 20 18 4 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 330
Quinn Priester, projected: 20 18 5 1 0 1 9 2 0 0 0 0 961
Lucas Sims, actual: 61 49 11 2 1 2 21 10 0 1 1 0 862
Lucas Sims, projected: 61 51 11 3 0 2 20 7 0 1 1 0 732
Yohan Ramírez, actual: 9 7 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 2884
Yohan Ramírez, projected: 9 7 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 630
Chris Martin, actual: 180 170 47 3 0 5 65 3 1 2 3 1 630
Chris Martin, projected: 181 172 44 7 0 5 66 6 0 1 2 0 595
Cam Booser, actual: 183 164 41 6 1 5 64 16 0 3 0 0 698
Cam Booser, projected: 184 164 41 6 1 5 64 16 0 3 0 0 695
Brad Keller, actual: 116 105 31 6 0 4 49 9 0 0 2 0 1017
Brad Keller, projected: 116 103 27 4 1 3 40 12 0 1 1 0 785
Richard Fitts, actual: 85 76 19 3 0 0 22 7 2 0 0 0 437
Richard Fitts, projected: 85 76 19 3 0 0 22 7 2 0 0 0 437
Garrett Whitlock, actual: 75 66 14 4 0 1 21 7 1 0 1 0 468
Garrett Whitlock, projected: 75 70 17 4 0 2 28 4 0 1 1 0 591
Bailey Horn, actual: 88 75 22 4 0 5 41 10 1 2 0 0 1278
Bailey Horn, projected: 88 75 22 4 0 5 41 10 1 2 0 0 1278
Joely Rodríguez, actual: 64 60 19 2 1 3 32 2 0 1 1 0 1201
Joely Rodríguez, projected: 64 56 15 3 0 1 22 6 1 1 1 0 781
Luis Guerrero, actual: 36 33 6 1 0 0 7 2 0 1 0 0 203
Luis Guerrero, projected: 36 33 6 1 0 0 7 2 0 1 0 0 203
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Chase Shugart, actual: 36 33 8 1 0 1 12 3 0 0 0 0 570
Chase Shugart, projected: 36 33 8 1 0 1 12 3 0 0 0 0 570
Trey Wingenter, actual: 14 12 5 1 0 1 9 2 0 0 0 0 2380
Trey Wingenter, projected: 14 12 3 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 480
Isaiah Campbell, actual: 37 35 14 3 0 3 26 2 0 0 0 0 2039
Isaiah Campbell, projected: 37 33 9 1 0 1 14 4 0 0 0 0 844
Zach Penrod, actual: 20 15 3 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 0 734
Zach Penrod, projected: 20 15 3 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 0 734
Naoyuki Uwasawa, actual: 16 14 2 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 249
Naoyuki Uwasawa, projected: 16 14 2 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 249
Rich Hill, actual: 15 10 1 0 0 1 4 3 0 1 1 0 941
Rich Hill, projected: 15 13 3 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 492
Dominic Smith, actual: 11 10 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 250
Dominic Smith, projected: 11 10 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 250
Joe Jacques, actual: 9 8 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1660
Joe Jacques, projected: 9 8 2 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 525
Pablo Reyes, actual: 5 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 755
Pablo Reyes, projected: 5 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 755
Red Sox, Actual: 6154 5548 1363 246 14 189 2204 461 14 53 76 2 697
Red Sox, Projected: 6172 5536 1370 263 17 175 2198 498 12 46 70 1 688
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.246 0.247
Slugging Average: 0.397 0.397
Walks (per PA): 0.075 0.081
SOs (per PA): 0.220 0.226
On-Base Average: 0.310 0.315
Power Factor: 1.617 1.604
OPS: 0.707 0.712
TPP Runs (to date): 747 700

Runs differential:
Actual Runs 47 greater than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.