Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Cubs 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Cubs Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.998)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Shota Imanaga, actual: 694 662 149 23 1 27 255 28 0 1 3 0 544
Shota Imanaga, projected: 693 661 149 23 1 27 255 28 0 1 3 0 546
Jameson Taillon, actual: 675 633 154 24 2 21 245 33 3 4 1 1 593
Jameson Taillon, projected: 674 623 157 32 3 21 259 39 3 4 5 0 664
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Javier Assad, actual: 638 562 143 30 2 20 237 63 3 4 5 1 774
Javier Assad, projected: 637 564 138 27 3 19 227 63 2 3 4 1 711
Justin Steele, actual: 555 506 111 23 0 12 170 37 5 3 4 0 518
Justin Steele, projected: 554 502 120 22 1 13 181 41 3 2 5 0 601
Kyle Hendricks, actual: 567 514 147 15 1 21 227 43 0 7 3 0 856
Kyle Hendricks, projected: 566 522 130 24 2 16 207 32 4 3 6 0 623
Hayden Wesneski, actual: 283 260 56 10 0 12 102 21 0 0 2 0 622
Hayden Wesneski, projected: 283 256 58 10 0 12 106 21 1 1 3 0 655
Shawn Armstrong, actual: 32 27 10 2 0 0 12 4 1 0 0 0 973
Shawn Armstrong, projected: 32 29 7 2 0 1 12 3 0 0 0 0 715
Nate Pearson, actual: 103 97 22 5 0 4 39 4 0 1 1 0 544
Nate Pearson, projected: 103 90 22 4 0 4 39 11 0 1 1 0 797
Tyson Miller, actual: 190 174 31 5 0 5 51 10 1 1 4 0 358
Tyson Miller, projected: 190 169 35 8 0 6 60 14 1 2 4 0 557
Héctor Neris, actual: 196 166 41 9 2 4 66 26 1 1 1 1 793
Héctor Neris, projected: 196 173 37 7 1 6 64 18 1 1 3 0 608
Drew Smyly, actual: 257 226 57 7 0 10 94 25 2 1 3 0 789
Drew Smyly, projected: 257 233 59 12 1 10 103 20 1 2 1 0 755
Mark Leiter Jr., actual: 152 138 27 1 1 2 36 13 0 0 1 0 457
Mark Leiter Jr., projected: 152 134 32 5 1 6 57 13 0 1 3 0 806
Ben Brown, actual: 222 197 41 9 0 5 65 19 1 4 1 0 513
Ben Brown, projected: 222 197 41 9 0 5 65 19 1 4 1 0 513
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Jorge López, actual: 106 98 21 2 0 3 32 8 0 0 0 0 453
Jorge López, projected: 106 93 26 5 0 4 42 9 0 1 2 0 875
Jordan Wicks, actual: 212 189 55 10 1 9 94 20 1 0 2 0 1021
Jordan Wicks, projected: 212 189 52 11 1 8 89 18 2 1 1 0 885
Porter Hodge, actual: 164 144 19 4 1 2 31 19 0 0 1 0 265
Porter Hodge, projected: 164 144 19 4 1 2 31 19 0 0 1 0 265
Jesús Tinoco, actual: 14 14 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 142
Jesús Tinoco, projected: 14 12 3 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 884
Richard Lovelady, actual: 28 26 9 3 0 1 15 2 0 0 0 0 1430
Richard Lovelady, projected: 28 25 6 1 0 1 10 2 0 0 0 0 680
Keegan Thompson, actual: 127 107 19 4 1 3 34 18 0 1 0 1 572
Keegan Thompson, projected: 127 110 25 5 1 4 42 14 0 1 2 0 715
Ethan Roberts, actual: 118 107 31 3 1 3 45 10 0 0 1 0 814
Ethan Roberts, projected: 118 104 31 5 1 5 51 12 0 0 2 0 1025
Luke Little, actual: 109 86 15 4 0 1 22 18 0 1 4 0 503
Luke Little, projected: 109 86 16 5 0 1 23 17 0 2 4 0 560
Enoli Paredes, actual: 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Enoli Paredes, projected: 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2033
Colten Brewer, actual: 95 82 24 6 1 1 35 9 0 3 1 0 1103
Colten Brewer, projected: 95 81 23 5 0 3 37 12 0 1 1 0 1063
Adbert Alzolay, actual: 75 68 19 1 0 6 38 6 0 0 1 0 1062
Adbert Alzolay, projected: 75 68 16 3 0 3 28 6 0 0 1 0 660
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Hunter Bigge, actual: 15 13 3 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 583
Hunter Bigge, projected: 15 14 3 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 311
José Cuas, actual: 65 55 16 1 1 3 28 6 0 1 3 0 1264
José Cuas, projected: 65 54 14 2 0 2 22 8 0 0 2 0 886
Yency Almonte, actual: 67 56 9 1 1 1 15 8 0 1 2 0 542
Yency Almonte, projected: 67 58 14 3 0 2 23 7 0 1 1 0 785
Julian Merryweather, actual: 74 61 18 8 1 0 28 9 0 1 3 0 1196
Julian Merryweather, projected: 74 65 16 3 0 2 25 8 0 1 1 0 736
Daniel Palencia, actual: 69 56 14 5 0 0 19 12 0 0 1 0 752
Daniel Palencia, projected: 69 58 13 3 0 1 20 10 0 0 1 0 614
Caleb Kilian, actual: 48 41 11 2 0 2 19 6 1 0 0 0 921
Caleb Kilian, projected: 48 38 12 3 0 1 17 7 0 0 2 0 1249
Trey Wingenter, actual: 28 25 8 0 0 1 11 2 1 0 0 0 983
Trey Wingenter, projected: 28 24 5 1 0 1 9 3 0 0 1 0 712
Jack Neely, actual: 28 26 8 0 0 2 14 2 0 0 0 0 1109
Jack Neely, projected: 28 26 8 0 0 2 14 2 0 0 0 0 1109
Gavin Hollowell, actual: 6 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 713
Gavin Hollowell, projected: 6 5 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 454
David Bote, actual: 5 4 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1017
David Bote, projected: 5 4 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1017
Matt Mervis, actual: 9 9 7 3 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 14234
Matt Mervis, projected: 9 9 7 3 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 14234
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Patrick Wisdom, actual: 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4066
Patrick Wisdom, projected: 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4066
Cubs, Actual: 6032 5439 1302 221 17 181 2100 485 21 35 48 4 660
Cubs, Projected: 6027 5424 1298 248 17 189 2144 483 19 33 61 1 662
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.239 0.239
Slugging Average: 0.386 0.395
Walks (per PA): 0.080 0.080
SOs (per PA): 0.223 0.229
On-Base Average: 0.305 0.307
Power Factor: 1.613 1.652
OPS: 0.692 0.702
TPP Runs (to date): 669 668

Runs differential:
Actual Runs 1 greater than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.