Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Reds 2025 Projected Batting Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Reds Projected Batting

Through games of Sunday, 28 September 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each player and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date Plate Appearances to his career Plate Appearances, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of Plate Appearances. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career PAs and 250 PAs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of Plate Appearances that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more PAs the man or team will have in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a team with an abysmal .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they send to the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, that team, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a team with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half its batters make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, they would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his PAs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—PAs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the team’s total Plate Appearances; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team PA total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team PAs to actual PAs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s batting, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.995)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TOP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team pitching numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Miguel Andujar, actual: 34 110 103 37 7 0 4 56 6 0 0 1 0 1228
Miguel Andujar, projected: 34 109 103 29 6 0 3 46 5 0 1 0 0 733
Will Banfield, actual: 7 10 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Will Banfield, projected: 7 10 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Will Benson, actual: 90 253 230 52 8 2 12 100 16 0 6 1 0 654
Will Benson, projected: 90 252 223 50 10 3 9 93 24 0 2 1 0 674
Tyler Callihan, actual: 4 6 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 119
Tyler Callihan, projected: 4 6 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 119
Jeimer Candelario, actual: 22 91 80 9 2 0 2 17 9 0 2 0 0 255
Jeimer Candelario, projected: 22 91 81 19 5 0 3 33 8 0 0 1 0 688
Elly De La Cruz, actual: 162 699 629 166 31 7 22 277 67 0 1 2 0 814
Elly De La Cruz, projected: 162 695 624 159 31 9 23 277 65 1 1 4 0 810
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Blake Dunn, actual: 30 75 60 9 2 0 1 14 8 0 0 7 0 454
Blake Dunn, projected: 30 75 62 9 2 0 1 16 7 0 0 6 0 372
Christian Encarnacion-Strand, actual: 36 137 130 27 4 0 6 49 3 0 2 2 0 466
Christian Encarnacion-Strand, projected: 36 136 127 30 5 0 6 51 6 0 1 2 0 587
Santiago Espinal, actual: 114 328 301 73 12 0 0 85 21 3 2 1 0 374
Santiago Espinal, projected: 114 326 297 78 15 0 4 104 23 2 2 2 0 567
Jake Fraley, actual: 67 193 168 39 8 0 6 65 24 0 0 1 0 742
Jake Fraley, projected: 67 192 169 42 8 0 6 68 20 0 1 2 0 775
TJ Friedl, actual: 152 685 579 151 22 2 14 219 81 4 5 16 0 872
TJ Friedl, projected: 152 681 588 151 22 6 20 244 65 5 7 16 0 864
Garrett Hampson, actual: 9 19 18 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 146
Garrett Hampson, projected: 9 19 17 4 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 422
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Ke'Bryan Hayes, actual: 52 178 158 37 6 1 3 54 18 0 1 1 0 595
Ke'Bryan Hayes, projected: 52 177 163 41 7 1 3 60 12 0 1 1 0 602
Austin Hays, actual: 103 416 380 101 16 5 15 172 29 0 6 1 0 807
Austin Hays, projected: 103 414 380 100 22 2 13 166 24 1 3 5 0 728
Rece Hinds, actual: 15 44 43 5 1 0 2 12 1 0 0 0 0 266
Rece Hinds, projected: 15 44 41 8 2 0 3 21 2 0 0 0 0 617
Jacob Hurtubise, actual: 12 15 12 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 197
Jacob Hurtubise, projected: 12 15 12 2 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 1 0 222
Connor Joe, actual: 35 70 61 13 4 0 0 17 6 0 2 1 0 357
Connor Joe, projected: 35 70 61 14 4 0 1 23 8 0 0 1 0 609
Gavin Lux, actual: 140 503 446 120 28 2 5 167 56 0 1 0 0 775
Gavin Lux, projected: 140 500 447 114 23 4 8 170 50 0 2 1 0 738
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Noelvi Marté, actual: 90 360 339 89 17 2 14 152 16 0 2 3 0 768
Noelvi Marté, projected: 90 358 337 85 16 1 10 135 16 0 1 3 0 627
Matt McLain, actual: 147 577 510 112 18 0 15 175 55 3 4 5 0 607
Matt McLain, projected: 147 574 512 128 24 2 18 211 50 2 2 7 0 763
Spencer Steer, actual: 146 568 509 121 21 2 21 209 51 1 2 5 0 699
Spencer Steer, projected: 146 565 498 121 27 3 19 210 57 0 2 7 0 783
Tyler Stephenson, actual: 88 342 299 69 18 0 13 126 37 0 4 2 0 768
Tyler Stephenson, projected: 88 340 302 79 16 1 11 128 32 0 2 4 0 804
Sal Stewart, actual: 18 58 55 14 1 0 5 30 3 0 0 0 0 878
Sal Stewart, projected: 18 58 55 14 1 0 5 30 3 0 0 0 0 826
Jose Trevino, actual: 93 302 282 67 20 0 4 99 15 1 4 0 0 468
Jose Trevino, projected: 93 300 281 66 14 0 7 101 14 1 3 1 0 491
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Austin Wynns, actual: 18 43 40 16 3 0 3 28 3 0 0 0 0 1797
Austin Wynns, projected: 18 43 40 9 2 0 1 14 2 1 0 0 0 459
Reds, Actual: 162 6082 5448 1333 250 23 167 2130 527 12 44 51 0 697
Reds, Projected: 162 6050 5436 1354 263 32 174 2212 495 14 31 65 0 714


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.245 0.249
Slugging Average: 0.391 0.407
Walks (per PA): 0.087 0.082
SOs (per PA): 0.233 0.234
On-Base Average: 0.315 0.318
Power Factor: 1.598 1.634
OPS: 0.706 0.724
Runs Expected from Actual Stats: 697
Runs Expected from Projected Stats: 714
Actual Runs Scored: 716

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2025 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 29 September 2025, at 12:00 pm Pacific Time.