Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Reds 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Reds Projected Pitching

Through games of Thursday, 4 June 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.976)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Andrew Abbott, actual: 13 298 264 68 5 1 9 102 31 33 206 0 2 0 1 0 11 778
Andrew Abbott, projected: 13 291 263 64 12 1 10 107 24 29 206 1 2 1 1 0 6 710
Tejay Antone, actual: 11 44 40 9 1 1 1 15 3 5 31 0 0 1 0 0 1 666
Tejay Antone, projected: 11 43 37 6 1 0 1 11 5 3 31 0 0 1 0 0 1 412
Graham Ashcraft, actual: 26 109 93 17 4 1 2 29 16 11 81 0 0 0 1 1 0 460
Graham Ashcraft, projected: 26 106 95 26 5 0 3 39 9 14 81 0 0 1 1 0 1 698
Brock Burke, actual: 30 124 104 22 7 1 3 40 17 15 85 1 1 1 1 2 2 711
Brock Burke, projected: 30 121 109 27 5 1 4 46 9 14 85 1 1 1 1 1 1 718
Chase Burns, actual: 12 273 251 46 9 0 9 82 21 16 211 0 0 0 2 0 6 449
Chase Burns, projected: 12 266 244 50 12 1 8 88 21 24 211 1 0 0 1 0 6 513
Caleb Ferguson, actual: 4 23 22 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 107
Caleb Ferguson, projected: 4 22 20 5 1 0 1 7 2 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 608
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Jose Franco, actual: 9 79 64 18 5 1 3 34 14 11 50 0 1 0 0 0 3 1218
Jose Franco, projected: 9 77 62 18 5 1 3 33 14 11 50 0 1 0 0 0 3 1242
P.J. Higgins, actual: 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P.J. Higgins, projected: 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pierce Johnson, actual: 24 92 82 19 5 1 3 35 8 8 66 1 1 0 0 0 1 678
Pierce Johnson, projected: 24 90 79 19 4 0 3 31 9 10 66 0 1 0 0 1 2 662
Brandon Leibrandt, actual: 1 30 26 10 2 0 2 18 3 5 18 0 1 0 0 1 0 1669
Brandon Leibrandt, projected: 1 29 25 7 1 0 1 12 4 4 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 972
Nick Lodolo, actual: 5 120 97 25 5 1 7 53 13 16 83 1 4 5 0 0 3 1003
Nick Lodolo, projected: 5 117 104 25 5 0 4 43 8 13 83 0 1 4 1 0 2 745
Rhett Lowder, actual: 8 166 148 36 9 1 2 53 18 24 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 623
Rhett Lowder, projected: 8 162 144 34 6 1 1 44 18 15 115 0 0 0 1 0 3 567
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Yunior Marté, actual: 1 6 4 3 1 0 0 4 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 14496
Yunior Marté, projected: 1 6 5 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1944
Zach Maxwell, actual: 4 25 21 7 0 0 2 13 4 5 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 1820
Zach Maxwell, projected: 4 24 22 6 1 0 2 13 3 4 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 1499
Zach McCambley, actual: 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1601
Zach McCambley, projected: 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1620
Luis Mey, actual: 6 40 31 6 1 0 2 13 7 5 25 0 0 2 0 0 0 980
Luis Mey, projected: 6 39 31 7 1 0 1 12 7 4 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 810
Sam Moll, actual: 29 109 90 15 2 0 2 23 13 10 79 0 1 4 1 1 3 490
Sam Moll, projected: 29 106 91 19 3 0 2 31 12 11 79 0 1 2 1 2 3 575
Kyle Nicolas, actual: 7 42 29 8 1 0 1 12 13 7 22 0 0 0 0 0 1 1567
Kyle Nicolas, projected: 7 41 34 9 1 0 1 13 6 6 22 0 0 1 0 0 0 995
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Chris Paddack, actual: 3 69 60 20 0 0 1 23 7 9 45 0 1 1 0 0 1 939
Chris Paddack, projected: 3 67 62 16 3 0 3 28 4 9 45 0 1 0 1 0 1 864
Emilio Pagán, actual: 15 62 53 14 3 1 3 28 6 10 42 0 2 1 0 1 2 1039
Emilio Pagán, projected: 15 60 55 12 3 0 3 23 4 7 42 0 0 0 0 0 1 680
Chase Petty, actual: 2 45 40 10 3 0 2 19 3 7 32 0 1 1 0 0 0 787
Chase Petty, projected: 2 44 37 12 3 0 3 23 6 11 32 0 1 1 0 0 0 1377
Connor Phillips, actual: 25 133 101 21 4 1 3 36 28 18 83 0 1 3 1 0 6 994
Connor Phillips, projected: 25 130 106 20 3 0 4 37 21 17 83 0 1 2 1 0 4 778
Lyon Richardson, actual: 2 10 7 2 0 0 2 8 2 5 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 2961
Lyon Richardson, projected: 2 10 8 2 1 0 0 4 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Tony Santillan, actual: 26 104 90 25 2 0 9 54 13 18 69 1 0 0 1 0 0 1159
Tony Santillan, projected: 26 101 87 20 4 0 3 34 11 10 69 0 1 2 1 0 0 729
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Brady Singer, actual: 11 238 217 70 9 2 16 131 16 36 153 1 1 3 1 0 4 1289
Brady Singer, projected: 11 232 209 55 10 1 7 88 17 28 153 1 2 4 1 0 3 810
Jose Trevino, actual: 4 29 27 14 2 0 0 16 1 8 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 2292
Jose Trevino, projected: 4 28 26 13 3 0 0 16 2 7 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 2349
Brandon Williamson, actual: 6 128 102 26 4 1 4 44 20 19 84 0 3 3 0 0 0 953
Brandon Williamson, projected: 6 125 111 27 6 0 5 48 12 16 84 0 1 1 1 0 0 783
Reds, Actual: 61 2405 2069 515 84 13 88 889 279 305 1639 5 20 28 9 8 46 316
Reds, Projected: 61 2344 2072 501 99 6 73 834 231 272 1639 4 14 23 12 6 39 275


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.249 0.242
Slugging Average: 0.430 0.403
Walks (per PA): 0.116 0.099
SOs (per PA): 0.198 0.230
On-Base Average: 0.343 0.323
Power Factor: 1.726 1.665
OPS: 0.773 0.725
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 316
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 275
Actual Runs Scored: 305

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Friday, 5 June 2026, at 5:02 am Pacific Time.