Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Rockies 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Rockies Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.99)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Austin Gomber, actual: 696 653 178 39 4 30 315 38 0 4 1 0 789
Austin Gomber, projected: 689 628 169 35 4 26 291 51 3 4 4 0 787
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Ryan Feltner, actual: 692 628 165 27 2 20 256 52 1 4 7 0 747
Ryan Feltner, projected: 685 611 162 27 4 21 259 61 1 5 8 1 823
Cal Quantrill, actual: 656 571 156 26 6 23 263 69 2 3 11 0 907
Cal Quantrill, projected: 650 583 151 26 4 19 241 50 3 4 9 0 734
Kyle Freeland, actual: 490 460 134 23 5 22 233 26 1 2 1 0 903
Kyle Freeland, projected: 485 438 122 23 4 16 201 36 3 4 4 0 843
Dakota Hudson, actual: 404 346 99 19 0 11 151 50 1 2 5 0 927
Dakota Hudson, projected: 400 346 89 19 0 9 136 44 1 3 5 0 722
Victor Vodnik, actual: 320 280 72 6 4 7 107 37 1 1 1 0 725
Victor Vodnik, projected: 317 279 76 8 3 6 109 35 1 1 1 0 771
Ty Blach, actual: 330 301 103 20 1 17 176 18 2 3 6 0 1222
Ty Blach, projected: 327 296 89 17 2 10 141 23 3 3 2 0 888
Jalen Beeks, actual: 211 188 49 6 0 6 73 18 2 2 1 0 713
Jalen Beeks, projected: 209 185 49 11 0 5 75 19 1 2 2 0 766
Tyler Kinley, actual: 285 246 61 14 2 11 112 33 1 3 2 0 886
Tyler Kinley, projected: 282 244 58 11 2 9 99 32 1 3 3 0 777
Peter Lambert, actual: 280 242 73 12 4 7 114 29 1 5 2 1 1053
Peter Lambert, projected: 277 246 75 15 5 11 132 24 1 2 3 0 1076
Justin Lawrence, actual: 279 233 73 11 1 9 113 33 2 4 7 0 1189
Justin Lawrence, projected: 276 231 64 12 2 5 94 34 2 4 5 0 929
Anthony Molina, actual: 264 236 72 16 1 5 105 22 0 4 2 0 914
Anthony Molina, projected: 261 234 71 16 1 5 104 22 0 4 2 0 921
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Nick Mears, actual: 203 178 47 11 0 2 64 21 0 4 0 0 743
Nick Mears, projected: 201 174 44 8 1 6 71 25 0 2 0 0 844
Jake Bird, actual: 185 154 43 11 0 5 69 25 1 1 4 0 973
Jake Bird, projected: 183 159 43 8 1 4 66 18 0 2 4 0 816
Tanner Gordon, actual: 160 149 53 9 3 10 98 6 1 1 2 1 1375
Tanner Gordon, projected: 158 148 52 9 3 10 97 6 1 1 2 1 1374
Angel Chivilli, actual: 133 122 31 2 2 7 58 10 0 0 1 0 780
Angel Chivilli, projected: 132 121 31 2 2 7 57 10 0 0 1 0 793
Bradley Blalock, actual: 143 123 35 10 1 4 59 19 0 0 1 0 1093
Bradley Blalock, projected: 142 121 34 10 1 4 57 19 0 0 1 0 1086
Noah Davis, actual: 96 88 31 6 0 3 46 7 1 0 0 0 1135
Noah Davis, projected: 95 84 29 5 0 4 45 9 0 0 2 0 1287
Jeff Criswell, actual: 87 76 20 4 0 4 36 9 0 1 1 0 977
Jeff Criswell, projected: 86 75 20 4 0 4 36 9 0 1 1 0 1004
Seth Halvorsen, actual: 46 43 8 0 0 2 14 2 0 0 1 0 450
Seth Halvorsen, projected: 46 43 8 0 0 2 14 2 0 0 1 0 450
Luis Peralta, actual: 49 40 7 1 0 0 8 5 1 1 2 0 324
Luis Peralta, projected: 49 40 7 1 0 0 8 5 1 1 2 0 324
Antonio Senzatela, actual: 54 46 15 1 1 3 27 8 0 0 0 0 1223
Antonio Senzatela, projected: 53 48 14 3 0 1 22 4 0 0 0 0 711
Josh Rogers, actual: 50 43 15 4 0 1 22 3 0 2 2 0 1188
Josh Rogers, projected: 50 44 12 2 0 3 22 4 0 0 1 0 937
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Jaden Hill, actual: 45 37 8 0 0 2 14 4 0 2 2 0 890
Jaden Hill, projected: 45 37 8 0 0 2 14 4 0 2 2 0 890
Geoff Hartlieb, actual: 44 39 13 4 1 1 22 4 0 1 0 0 1450
Geoff Hartlieb, projected: 44 36 11 3 0 1 18 6 0 1 1 0 1208
Matt Carasiti, actual: 43 39 16 3 0 2 25 3 0 0 1 0 1650
Matt Carasiti, projected: 43 36 12 2 0 1 19 5 0 1 1 0 1226
Germán Márquez, actual: 20 16 5 0 0 1 8 4 0 0 0 0 1333
Germán Márquez, projected: 20 18 5 1 0 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 714
Riley Pint, actual: 22 15 5 0 0 2 11 5 0 0 2 0 2707
Riley Pint, projected: 22 14 5 1 0 2 10 6 0 0 2 0 3442
John Curtiss, actual: 12 12 6 2 0 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 2827
John Curtiss, projected: 12 11 3 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 482
Lucas Gilbreath, actual: 12 10 7 2 0 1 12 1 0 0 1 0 10489
Lucas Gilbreath, projected: 12 10 2 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 340
Chasen Shreve, actual: 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 316
Chasen Shreve, projected: 4 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 474
Evan Justice, actual: 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 825
Evan Justice, projected: 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Matt Koch, actual: 5 4 3 1 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 16013
Matt Koch, projected: 5 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 357
Rockies, Actual: 6322 5623 1604 290 38 221 2633 563 18 50 66 2 929
Rockies, Projected: 6262 5549 1518 280 39 194 2458 567 22 50 69 2 846
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.285 0.274
Slugging Average: 0.468 0.443
Walks (per PA): 0.089 0.091
SOs (per PA): 0.177 0.187
On-Base Average: 0.354 0.345
Power Factor: 1.642 1.619
OPS: 0.823 0.788
TPP Runs (to date): 929 833

Runs differential:
Actual Runs 96 greater than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.