Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Tigers 2026 Projected Batting Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Tigers Projected Batting

Through games of Wednesday, 12 August 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each player and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date Plate Appearances to his career Plate Appearances, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of Plate Appearances. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career PAs and 250 PAs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of Plate Appearances that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more PAs the man or team will have in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a team with an abysmal .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they send to the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, that team, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a team with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half its batters make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, they would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his PAs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—PAs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the team’s total Plate Appearances; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team PA total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team PAs to actual PAs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s batting, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.995)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TOP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team pitching numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Javier Báez, actual: 34 126 120 34 6 0 2 46 4 0 1 1 0 588
Javier Báez, projected: 34 125 118 30 6 1 5 51 6 0 1 1 0 697
Kerry Carpenter, actual: 81 259 231 48 5 2 13 96 18 0 3 5 2 690
Kerry Carpenter, projected: 81 258 235 61 10 2 13 116 16 0 2 4 1 841
Max Clark, actual: 11 50 45 13 2 1 1 20 4 0 0 1 0 983
Max Clark, projected: 11 50 45 13 2 1 1 20 4 0 0 1 0 984
Trei Cruz, actual: 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Trei Cruz, projected: 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dillon Dingler, actual: 111 471 424 113 23 2 26 218 29 0 3 13 2 950
Dillon Dingler, projected: 111 469 430 113 22 3 18 196 25 0 2 10 1 790
Riley Greene, actual: 117 492 422 115 25 1 16 190 61 0 5 4 0 945
Riley Greene, projected: 117 490 437 116 23 3 18 198 46 0 3 3 0 845
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Jahmai Jones, actual: 57 105 95 13 2 0 2 21 10 0 0 0 0 235
Jahmai Jones, projected: 57 105 93 21 6 1 3 37 9 0 0 2 0 652
Corey Julks, actual: 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Corey Julks, projected: 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jace Jung, actual: 3 8 6 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 564
Jace Jung, projected: 3 8 7 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 221
Colt Keith, actual: 110 344 317 84 14 4 8 130 22 0 2 3 0 699
Colt Keith, projected: 110 342 312 81 13 3 9 124 27 0 2 2 0 726
Hao-Yu Lee, actual: 76 211 198 53 11 1 6 84 10 1 2 0 0 669
Hao-Yu Lee, projected: 76 210 197 53 11 1 6 84 10 1 2 0 0 648
Ben Malgeri, actual: 25 57 47 12 2 0 1 17 9 0 1 0 0 905
Ben Malgeri, projected: 25 57 47 12 2 0 1 17 9 0 1 0 0 842
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Kevin McGonigle, actual: 116 524 444 127 21 3 12 190 75 0 2 3 0 1090
Kevin McGonigle, projected: 116 522 442 126 21 3 12 189 75 0 2 3 0 1073
Zach McKinstry, actual: 95 327 287 64 13 3 4 95 33 3 2 2 0 625
Zach McKinstry, projected: 95 325 291 67 14 4 7 109 28 1 2 3 0 641
Parker Meadows, actual: 12 39 36 9 1 1 0 12 2 0 0 1 0 697
Parker Meadows, projected: 12 39 35 8 1 1 1 13 4 0 0 0 0 746
James Outman, actual: 45 100 93 17 0 1 5 34 5 0 0 2 0 510
James Outman, projected: 45 100 87 18 3 1 4 33 10 0 0 2 0 686
Wenceel Pérez, actual: 53 175 161 29 4 1 7 56 14 0 0 0 0 478
Wenceel Pérez, projected: 53 174 158 37 7 2 5 63 14 0 1 1 0 614
Jake Rogers, actual: 34 110 93 15 2 1 3 28 13 1 2 1 0 502
Jake Rogers, projected: 34 109 98 19 4 1 4 37 9 1 1 1 0 535
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Zack Short, actual: 23 46 36 6 2 0 0 8 7 0 2 1 0 524
Zack Short, projected: 23 46 39 7 1 0 1 11 5 1 1 0 0 424
Spencer Torkelson, actual: 119 472 411 94 21 0 20 175 51 0 4 5 1 721
Spencer Torkelson, projected: 119 470 414 94 22 1 18 171 47 0 3 5 0 679
Gleyber Torres, actual: 63 280 235 61 8 0 8 93 40 0 2 3 0 915
Gleyber Torres, projected: 63 279 246 65 11 0 10 106 28 0 2 2 0 804
Eduardo Valencia, actual: 15 43 41 16 5 0 4 33 1 0 0 1 0 1848
Eduardo Valencia, projected: 15 43 41 16 5 0 4 33 1 0 0 1 0 1848
Matt Vierling, actual: 92 291 266 55 13 3 5 89 19 1 5 0 0 444
Matt Vierling, projected: 92 290 263 66 12 2 6 101 21 0 3 2 0 639
Gage Workman, actual: 16 38 38 6 3 0 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 381
Gage Workman, projected: 16 38 37 7 3 0 1 14 1 0 0 0 0 301
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Tigers, Actual: 120 4575 4053 985 183 24 145 1651 429 6 36 46 5 551
Tigers, Projected: 120 4556 4079 1031 199 30 147 1726 396 4 28 43 2 560


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.243 0.253
Slugging Average: 0.407 0.423
Walks (per PA): 0.094 0.087
SOs (per PA): 0.226 0.235
On-Base Average: 0.320 0.323
Power Factor: 1.676 1.674
OPS: 0.727 0.747
Runs Expected from Actual Stats: 551
Runs Expected from Projected Stats: 560
Actual Runs Scored: 549

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Thursday, 13 August 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.