Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Tigers 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Tigers Projected Pitching

Through games of Sunday, 12 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.001)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Drew Anderson, actual: 34 242 215 52 11 0 9 90 20 29 168 2 1 4 1 1 5 752
Drew Anderson, projected: 34 242 216 57 12 0 7 91 20 34 168 1 1 4 2 2 7 810
Beau Brieske, actual: 8 39 35 9 0 0 3 18 4 7 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 858
Beau Brieske, projected: 8 39 35 8 1 0 1 14 4 5 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 608
Enmanuel De Jesus, actual: 22 134 119 27 2 3 1 38 13 17 95 2 0 0 0 0 1 535
Enmanuel De Jesus, projected: 22 134 117 29 4 2 1 40 14 20 95 2 0 2 0 0 2 633
Kyle Finnegan, actual: 40 177 151 38 9 1 4 61 25 10 127 1 0 0 0 0 7 668
Kyle Finnegan, projected: 40 177 157 38 6 1 5 61 17 19 127 1 1 1 1 2 6 660
Jack Flaherty, actual: 18 371 318 76 20 3 9 129 40 49 247 2 4 7 2 1 3 824
Jack Flaherty, projected: 18 371 331 75 14 1 12 128 32 40 247 1 2 5 2 1 3 684
Brenan Hanifee, actual: 14 59 53 15 3 0 2 24 4 5 41 1 0 1 0 0 0 757
Brenan Hanifee, projected: 14 59 55 15 3 1 1 22 3 6 41 0 0 0 1 0 1 764
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tyler Holton, actual: 40 177 164 46 8 1 5 71 10 19 126 1 0 2 1 0 0 703
Tyler Holton, projected: 40 177 165 34 5 0 5 56 9 15 126 1 1 1 1 0 1 478
Brant Hurter, actual: 21 101 86 15 5 0 1 23 12 9 76 1 1 1 2 1 2 405
Brant Hurter, projected: 21 101 89 19 3 0 2 28 8 9 76 1 1 2 1 1 2 517
Kenley Jansen, actual: 27 99 85 16 0 0 5 31 13 13 71 0 1 0 0 0 8 730
Kenley Jansen, projected: 27 99 90 16 3 0 2 27 8 8 71 0 1 1 1 1 4 462
Ty Madden, actual: 7 82 76 16 2 0 2 24 5 7 60 0 0 1 2 0 1 537
Ty Madden, projected: 7 82 75 18 3 0 2 27 6 9 60 0 0 1 1 0 2 648
Troy Melton, actual: 8 189 175 29 7 0 7 57 11 11 148 0 1 2 1 0 1 424
Troy Melton, projected: 8 189 173 31 6 0 7 58 13 13 148 1 1 2 2 0 3 466
Casey Mize, actual: 14 304 282 59 21 1 5 97 18 25 232 0 3 1 3 0 8 464
Casey Mize, projected: 14 304 279 71 14 2 10 118 19 34 232 0 2 3 3 0 6 683
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Keider Montero, actual: 20 387 358 76 16 2 9 123 22 38 292 3 2 2 1 2 1 461
Keider Montero, projected: 20 387 356 88 14 2 14 149 27 45 292 1 1 2 1 1 3 632
Jake Rogers, actual: 2 6 6 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 710
Jake Rogers, projected: 2 6 6 2 1 0 0 3 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1620
Connor Seabold, actual: 11 69 60 17 3 0 2 26 5 6 47 0 3 1 0 0 1 912
Connor Seabold, projected: 11 69 61 20 4 1 3 34 6 12 47 0 1 1 0 0 0 1178
Tarik Skubal, actual: 13 297 280 61 13 1 10 106 11 29 227 1 1 4 4 0 4 520
Tarik Skubal, projected: 13 297 276 60 12 1 9 100 16 28 227 1 2 3 2 0 2 511
Burch Smith, actual: 13 73 65 18 6 0 2 30 7 8 51 1 0 0 0 0 1 748
Burch Smith, projected: 13 73 65 18 4 0 3 30 7 11 51 0 0 0 0 0 1 860
Drew Sommers, actual: 17 48 40 11 1 0 1 15 6 6 30 1 0 1 0 1 1 882
Drew Sommers, projected: 17 48 39 13 1 1 1 20 6 9 30 1 0 1 0 1 1 1210
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Framber Valdez, actual: 19 469 420 106 17 1 11 158 36 54 323 0 3 10 2 0 13 739
Framber Valdez, projected: 19 470 418 97 16 2 9 144 40 47 323 1 3 6 4 0 9 614
Ricky Vanasco, actual: 5 40 34 14 4 0 2 24 6 12 19 0 0 0 2 0 0 2902
Ricky Vanasco, projected: 5 40 36 12 4 0 1 20 4 11 19 0 0 0 1 0 0 1912
Justin Verlander, actual: 1 19 17 6 1 1 1 12 2 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1854
Justin Verlander, projected: 1 19 17 4 1 0 0 6 1 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Will Vest, actual: 27 116 102 28 5 0 2 39 10 22 80 1 1 2 1 0 1 724
Will Vest, projected: 27 116 104 26 5 0 2 36 9 13 80 1 2 1 1 0 1 660
Jacob Waguespack, actual: 9 47 43 6 0 0 2 12 2 2 37 1 0 1 1 0 0 395
Jacob Waguespack, projected: 9 47 42 11 2 0 2 18 4 6 37 0 0 1 1 0 1 774
Tigers, Actual: 96 3545 3184 743 154 14 95 1210 282 383 2540 18 21 40 23 6 58 377
Tigers, Projected: 96 3546 3202 762 138 14 99 1230 274 397 2540 13 19 37 25 9 55 383


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.233 0.238
Slugging Average: 0.380 0.384
Walks (per PA): 0.080 0.077
SOs (per PA): 0.224 0.228
On-Base Average: 0.302 0.304
Power Factor: 1.629 1.614
OPS: 0.682 0.688
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 377
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 383
Actual Runs Scored: 383

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, at 5:30 am Pacific Time.