Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Royals 2025 Projected Batting Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Royals Projected Batting

Through games of Saturday, 21 June 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each player and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date Plate Appearances to his career Plate Appearances, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of Plate Appearances. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career PAs and 250 PAs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of Plate Appearances that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more PAs the man or team will have in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a team with an abysmal .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they send to the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, that team, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a team with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half its batters make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, they would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his PAs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—PAs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the team’s total Plate Appearances; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team PA total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team PAs to actual PAs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s batting, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.011)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TOP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team pitching numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Bobby Witt Jr., actual: 77 334 300 85 26 3 10 147 26 0 5 3 0 1018
Bobby Witt Jr., projected: 77 338 309 89 19 4 13 155 22 0 4 3 0 941
Vinnie Pasquantino, actual: 76 320 292 78 7 1 11 120 23 0 1 4 0 815
Vinnie Pasquantino, projected: 76 323 288 77 14 1 11 126 28 0 4 3 0 821
Maikel Garcia, actual: 75 307 276 87 19 3 8 136 26 2 2 1 0 985
Maikel Garcia, projected: 75 310 282 74 14 3 4 106 23 1 4 1 0 684
Salvador Perez, actual: 73 304 286 67 19 0 8 110 13 0 1 3 1 515
Salvador Perez, projected: 73 307 288 77 14 1 13 131 12 0 2 4 0 717
Jonathan India, actual: 69 298 265 64 13 0 4 89 28 0 2 3 0 571
Jonathan India, projected: 69 301 259 65 14 1 8 104 31 0 2 8 0 806
Michael Massey, actual: 56 209 198 40 5 0 2 51 5 1 4 1 0 291
Michael Massey, projected: 56 211 196 46 8 1 6 74 9 1 2 3 0 580
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Kyle Isbel, actual: 67 195 178 45 6 3 3 66 6 8 3 0 0 479
Kyle Isbel, projected: 67 197 180 42 9 3 3 67 11 3 1 1 0 507
Drew Waters, actual: 60 194 184 48 6 3 1 63 8 0 0 2 0 643
Drew Waters, projected: 60 196 178 43 7 3 4 68 15 0 1 2 0 652
Freddy Fermin, actual: 44 139 128 32 3 0 2 41 9 1 0 1 0 503
Freddy Fermin, projected: 44 140 130 35 5 0 3 50 8 1 1 1 0 609
Mark Canha, actual: 41 109 97 23 3 0 0 26 7 0 2 3 0 457
Mark Canha, projected: 41 110 94 24 5 0 3 39 11 0 1 4 0 829
Hunter Renfroe, actual: 35 108 99 18 6 0 0 24 8 0 1 0 0 227
Hunter Renfroe, projected: 35 109 99 23 5 0 6 46 8 0 1 1 0 746
Cavan Biggio, actual: 37 83 69 12 2 0 1 17 11 2 0 1 0 396
Cavan Biggio, projected: 37 84 70 16 3 0 2 26 11 0 0 1 0 716
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Jac Caglianone, actual: 16 64 60 13 3 0 2 22 3 0 0 1 0 504
Jac Caglianone, projected: 16 65 61 13 3 0 2 22 3 0 0 1 0 456
Nick Loftin, actual: 18 57 52 11 3 2 1 21 4 0 1 0 0 468
Nick Loftin, projected: 18 58 51 11 2 1 0 16 5 0 1 0 0 523
MJ Melendez, actual: 16 52 47 4 1 0 1 8 3 0 0 2 0 187
MJ Melendez, projected: 16 53 47 10 2 0 2 18 5 0 0 0 0 578
John Rave, actual: 20 39 34 7 3 0 0 10 2 2 1 0 0 255
John Rave, projected: 20 39 34 7 3 0 0 10 2 2 1 0 0 212
Luke Maile, actual: 3 10 8 3 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 2473
Luke Maile, projected: 3 10 9 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 369
Dairon Blanco, actual: 9 8 6 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
Dairon Blanco, projected: 9 8 7 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 658
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Tyler Tolbert, actual: 16 8 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 448
Tyler Tolbert, projected: 16 8 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Royals, Actual: 77 2838 2587 639 126 15 55 960 184 18 23 25 1 289
Royals, Projected: 77 2867 2590 657 127 18 80 1065 206 8 25 33 0 334


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.247 0.254
Slugging Average: 0.371 0.411
Walks (per PA): 0.065 0.072
SOs (per PA): 0.185 0.201
On-Base Average: 0.301 0.314
Power Factor: 1.502 1.621
OPS: 0.672 0.725
Runs Expected from Actual Stats: 289
Runs Expected from Projected Stats: 334
Actual Runs Scored: 260

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2025 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Sunday, 22 June 2025, at 4:22 pm Pacific Time.