Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Royals 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Royals Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.01)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Seth Lugo, actual: 836 773 177 36 6 16 273 48 2 4 9 0 507
Seth Lugo, projected: 844 773 183 34 4 23 294 54 3 7 8 0 591
Cole Ragans, actual: 762 685 146 32 3 15 229 67 3 1 6 0 495
Cole Ragans, projected: 770 689 150 28 4 16 235 72 2 2 5 0 526
Brady Singer, actual: 762 693 175 34 3 22 281 54 4 1 10 0 665
Brady Singer, projected: 770 695 182 33 3 22 286 56 2 5 11 0 724
Michael Wacha, actual: 685 625 154 29 4 17 242 45 5 4 5 1 593
Michael Wacha, projected: 692 627 159 33 3 20 258 52 4 5 4 0 681
Michael Lorenzen, actual: 117 104 19 6 0 2 31 12 0 0 1 0 452
Michael Lorenzen, projected: 118 105 25 5 0 3 41 11 0 1 1 0 641
Alec Marsh, actual: 548 493 123 28 3 19 214 39 0 4 11 1 740
Alec Marsh, projected: 553 487 124 28 5 22 228 49 1 3 12 1 860
Lucas Erceg, actual: 97 93 18 4 0 0 22 3 0 0 1 0 239
Lucas Erceg, projected: 98 85 19 5 0 1 28 10 0 0 2 0 526
Chris Stratton, actual: 257 214 53 13 2 5 85 33 1 6 3 0 818
Chris Stratton, projected: 260 230 60 12 2 7 96 25 1 3 1 0 769
James McArthur, actual: 247 228 68 10 1 8 104 14 1 1 3 0 838
James McArthur, projected: 249 232 65 13 1 7 103 12 1 2 3 0 724
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Ángel Zerpa, actual: 239 216 59 8 1 6 87 19 1 1 2 0 789
Ángel Zerpa, projected: 241 220 58 10 0 7 92 15 1 1 3 0 709
John Schreiber, actual: 224 198 48 10 1 1 63 20 0 2 4 0 610
John Schreiber, projected: 226 200 47 11 1 4 73 20 0 2 4 0 617
Hunter Harvey, actual: 29 24 8 4 0 1 15 4 0 0 1 0 1620
Hunter Harvey, projected: 29 27 6 1 0 1 10 2 0 0 0 0 578
Daniel Lynch IV, actual: 174 154 29 6 0 6 53 14 0 2 4 0 536
Daniel Lynch IV, projected: 176 156 42 7 1 6 69 15 0 2 2 0 872
Sam Long, actual: 176 156 34 6 0 5 55 17 1 1 1 0 542
Sam Long, projected: 178 158 39 9 1 6 66 16 1 1 1 0 731
Will Smith, actual: 186 165 45 11 0 7 77 15 2 1 3 0 874
Will Smith, projected: 188 168 39 8 1 6 67 16 1 2 1 0 669
Nick Anderson, actual: 153 135 35 11 0 6 64 15 0 2 1 0 822
Nick Anderson, projected: 155 141 30 7 1 5 54 11 0 1 1 0 533
Kris Bubic, actual: 121 112 26 5 1 2 39 5 2 2 0 0 463
Kris Bubic, projected: 122 108 29 5 0 4 48 12 0 1 1 0 811
Carlos Hernández, actual: 129 109 24 8 0 1 35 16 0 3 1 0 667
Carlos Hernández, projected: 130 113 29 6 1 3 46 15 0 2 1 0 781
Walter Pennington, actual: 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Walter Pennington, projected: 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Matt Sauer, actual: 84 71 23 4 1 3 38 11 0 1 1 0 1410
Matt Sauer, projected: 85 72 23 4 1 3 38 11 0 1 1 0 1366
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Anthony Veneziano, actual: 11 10 4 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1539
Anthony Veneziano, projected: 11 10 3 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 610
Tyler Duffey, actual: 42 32 7 3 0 0 10 8 0 1 1 0 783
Tyler Duffey, projected: 42 39 10 2 0 1 17 3 0 0 0 0 639
Will Klein, actual: 27 25 10 3 0 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 1255
Will Klein, projected: 27 22 9 3 0 0 11 4 0 1 0 0 1787
Colin Selby, actual: 13 11 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 453
Colin Selby, projected: 13 11 3 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 590
Steven Cruz, actual: 18 18 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
Steven Cruz, projected: 18 15 3 1 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 450
Jordan Lyles, actual: 19 17 2 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 186
Jordan Lyles, projected: 19 17 5 1 0 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 914
Dan Altavilla, actual: 21 16 5 1 0 1 9 3 0 0 1 1 1800
Dan Altavilla, projected: 21 18 4 1 0 1 7 3 0 0 0 0 860
Jonathan Bowlan, actual: 17 14 6 0 0 3 15 3 0 0 0 0 3267
Jonathan Bowlan, projected: 17 16 6 0 0 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 2028
Garrett Hampson, actual: 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 101
Garrett Hampson, projected: 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 101
Nick Loftin, actual: 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nick Loftin, projected: 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nick Pratto, actual: 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 316
Nick Pratto, projected: 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 316
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Royals, Actual: 6007 5403 1303 275 26 146 2068 472 22 37 70 3 634
Royals, Projected: 6065 5446 1354 268 29 171 2205 492 17 42 63 1 687
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.241 0.249
Slugging Average: 0.383 0.405
Walks (per PA): 0.079 0.081
SOs (per PA): 0.223 0.230
On-Base Average: 0.308 0.316
Power Factor: 1.587 1.629
OPS: 0.691 0.721
TPP Runs (to date): 644 687

Runs differential:
Actual Runs -43 less than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.