Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Royals 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Royals Projected Pitching

Through games of Tuesday, 19 May 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.989)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Luinder Avila, actual: 9 78 68 20 9 0 1 32 10 9 55 0 0 0 0 0 3 762
Luinder Avila, projected: 9 77 67 16 7 0 1 24 9 6 55 0 1 0 0 0 2 612
Mason Black, actual: 4 22 20 7 1 0 0 8 2 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 937
Mason Black, projected: 4 22 19 6 1 0 1 10 2 3 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1094
Kris Bubic, actual: 9 207 180 36 8 1 4 58 26 23 151 0 0 1 0 0 5 517
Kris Bubic, projected: 9 205 181 46 9 1 6 74 20 24 151 0 2 2 1 0 1 702
Noah Cameron, actual: 8 187 171 49 14 1 5 80 14 28 125 0 2 0 3 0 0 936
Noah Cameron, projected: 8 185 169 39 8 1 6 66 14 18 125 0 0 1 2 0 0 668
Eric Cerantola, actual: 2 14 10 2 0 0 1 5 4 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 1335
Eric Cerantola, projected: 2 14 10 2 0 0 1 5 4 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 1296
Steven Cruz, actual: 10 47 38 9 1 0 4 22 8 9 29 1 0 0 1 2 2 1312
Steven Cruz, projected: 10 46 40 8 2 0 1 15 5 5 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 616
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Lucas Erceg, actual: 20 80 67 15 5 0 0 20 13 9 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 450
Lucas Erceg, projected: 20 79 70 16 4 0 1 23 8 8 58 0 0 2 0 1 0 518
Carlos Estévez, actual: 1 7 5 4 0 0 1 7 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22705
Carlos Estévez, projected: 1 7 6 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3078
Bailey Falter, actual: 4 41 35 15 2 0 1 20 6 8 22 0 0 0 0 0 1 1955
Bailey Falter, projected: 4 41 37 10 2 0 2 17 3 5 22 0 0 0 0 0 1 972
Stephen Kolek, actual: 3 69 64 13 1 0 3 23 4 8 51 0 0 1 1 0 1 590
Stephen Kolek, projected: 3 68 62 16 2 0 1 23 4 8 51 0 0 1 0 0 1 540
Alex Lange, actual: 19 94 78 19 6 0 2 31 13 14 65 0 1 2 0 0 7 799
Alex Lange, projected: 19 93 77 17 3 0 2 26 13 11 65 0 1 2 1 0 3 733
Seth Lugo, actual: 10 246 222 61 15 2 2 86 21 25 176 1 2 0 1 0 1 625
Seth Lugo, projected: 10 243 222 53 10 1 7 86 17 25 176 1 2 2 1 1 2 616
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Daniel Lynch IV, actual: 19 79 71 10 4 0 1 17 6 7 60 0 0 2 1 0 0 320
Daniel Lynch IV, projected: 19 78 69 18 3 0 3 29 7 9 60 0 1 1 1 0 1 750
Nick Mears, actual: 19 72 62 15 5 1 1 25 8 6 53 1 1 0 0 1 0 555
Nick Mears, projected: 19 71 62 15 3 0 2 25 7 9 53 0 1 0 0 0 1 648
Eli Morgan, actual: 8 54 48 15 1 0 3 25 6 7 34 0 0 0 1 0 2 1280
Eli Morgan, projected: 8 53 49 12 3 0 2 22 4 7 34 0 0 0 0 0 1 810
Cole Ragans, actual: 8 151 127 27 5 0 10 62 23 20 106 0 1 0 1 0 3 872
Cole Ragans, projected: 8 149 133 29 6 1 4 48 14 16 106 0 1 1 1 0 2 608
John Schreiber, actual: 21 84 70 18 5 0 3 32 10 7 58 1 2 1 0 3 1 797
John Schreiber, projected: 21 83 74 18 4 0 2 28 7 9 58 0 1 1 0 1 0 656
Mitch Spence, actual: 1 21 15 4 0 1 1 9 5 6 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 1785
Mitch Spence, projected: 1 21 19 5 1 0 1 9 1 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Matt Strahm, actual: 17 71 63 14 4 0 3 27 7 7 49 0 0 1 0 0 1 762
Matt Strahm, projected: 17 70 63 14 3 0 2 24 5 7 49 0 1 1 0 0 1 619
Tyler Tolbert, actual: 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tyler Tolbert, projected: 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Michael Wacha, actual: 9 224 202 39 10 0 7 70 18 18 172 1 0 3 2 0 3 465
Michael Wacha, projected: 9 221 201 50 10 1 6 82 16 24 172 1 1 1 2 1 2 594
Royals, Actual: 49 1850 1618 393 96 6 53 660 206 220 1302 5 10 11 11 6 33 215
Royals, Projected: 49 1828 1632 393 81 5 51 639 161 201 1302 2 12 15 9 4 21 200


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.243 0.241
Slugging Average: 0.408 0.392
Walks (per PA): 0.111 0.088
SOs (per PA): 0.221 0.229
On-Base Average: 0.331 0.313
Power Factor: 1.679 1.626
OPS: 0.739 0.704
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 215
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 200
Actual Runs Scored: 220

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 20 May 2026, at 5:02 am Pacific Time.