Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Angels 2025 Projected Batting Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Angels Projected Batting

Through games of Sunday, 28 September 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each player and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date Plate Appearances to his career Plate Appearances, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of Plate Appearances. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career PAs and 250 PAs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of Plate Appearances that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more PAs the man or team will have in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a team with an abysmal .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they send to the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, that team, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a team with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half its batters make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, they would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his PAs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—PAs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the team’s total Plate Appearances; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team PA total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team PAs to actual PAs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s batting, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.01)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TOP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team pitching numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Jo Adell, actual: 152 573 526 124 18 1 37 255 33 0 1 10 3 794
Jo Adell, projected: 152 579 532 117 20 3 26 222 35 0 2 8 2 609
Tim Anderson, actual: 31 90 83 17 3 0 0 20 3 1 0 3 0 284
Tim Anderson, projected: 31 91 87 24 4 0 2 35 3 0 0 1 0 646
Gustavo Campero, actual: 28 66 58 10 1 0 3 20 5 0 0 3 0 520
Gustavo Campero, projected: 28 67 61 12 1 1 2 21 3 0 0 3 0 577
Travis d'Arnaud, actual: 69 231 213 42 13 0 6 73 13 0 1 4 0 426
Travis d'Arnaud, projected: 69 233 213 52 11 0 8 89 17 0 1 3 0 647
Logan Davidson, actual: 10 23 22 4 1 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 0 352
Logan Davidson, projected: 10 23 21 3 1 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 83
J.D. Davis, actual: 5 9 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 40
J.D. Davis, projected: 5 9 8 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 557
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Denzer Guzmán, actual: 13 43 42 8 1 0 2 15 1 0 0 0 0 448
Denzer Guzmán, projected: 13 43 42 8 1 0 2 15 1 0 0 0 0 448
Niko Kavadas, actual: 10 23 20 2 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 135
Niko Kavadas, projected: 10 23 20 3 0 0 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 502
Carter Kieboom, actual: 3 8 8 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 335
Carter Kieboom, projected: 3 8 7 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 221
Scott Kingery, actual: 19 29 27 4 1 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 123
Scott Kingery, projected: 19 29 27 6 2 0 1 10 2 0 0 0 0 549
Nicky Lopez, actual: 4 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicky Lopez, projected: 4 6 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 297
Matthew Lugo, actual: 31 70 69 16 2 1 4 32 0 0 0 1 0 541
Matthew Lugo, projected: 31 71 70 16 2 1 4 32 0 0 0 1 0 496
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Yoán Moncada, actual: 84 289 248 58 13 2 12 111 32 0 2 7 0 844
Yoán Moncada, projected: 84 292 259 65 14 2 9 110 29 0 1 3 0 788
Christian Moore, actual: 53 184 162 32 5 1 7 60 19 1 1 1 0 575
Christian Moore, projected: 53 186 164 32 5 1 7 61 19 1 1 1 0 554
Zach Neto, actual: 128 554 502 129 29 1 26 238 33 2 3 14 0 819
Zach Neto, projected: 128 560 502 124 30 1 22 221 35 3 3 17 0 736
Kevin Newman, actual: 56 116 114 23 2 0 2 31 1 1 0 0 0 290
Kevin Newman, projected: 56 117 109 28 5 1 1 39 6 1 1 1 0 581
Logan O'Hoppe, actual: 119 451 423 90 8 1 19 157 24 1 1 2 0 507
Logan O'Hoppe, projected: 119 456 421 97 12 1 20 172 28 1 1 5 0 616
Kyren Paris, actual: 44 140 126 24 4 1 6 48 10 0 0 3 1 644
Kyren Paris, projected: 44 141 125 20 3 1 4 36 12 1 0 2 1 473
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Oswald Peraza, actual: 35 95 86 16 1 0 2 23 6 0 1 1 1 386
Oswald Peraza, projected: 35 96 87 16 3 0 2 25 7 0 0 2 0 406
Luis Rengifo, actual: 147 541 501 119 16 3 9 168 33 1 3 3 0 532
Luis Rengifo, projected: 147 546 500 125 19 3 14 191 37 2 3 5 0 638
Sebastián Rivero, actual: 11 34 33 6 2 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 433
Sebastián Rivero, projected: 11 34 32 5 1 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 216
Nolan Schanuel, actual: 132 564 488 129 23 1 12 190 59 3 4 10 0 789
Nolan Schanuel, projected: 132 570 488 126 20 0 11 181 64 3 5 10 0 755
Jorge Soler, actual: 82 315 279 60 12 0 12 108 28 0 3 4 1 667
Jorge Soler, projected: 82 318 277 67 15 0 15 127 34 0 2 4 1 831
Chad Stevens, actual: 5 14 13 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 27
Chad Stevens, projected: 5 14 13 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 27
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Chris Taylor, actual: 30 90 78 14 5 0 2 25 5 0 1 6 0 509
Chris Taylor, projected: 30 91 81 20 5 1 3 34 9 0 0 1 0 813
Bryce Teodosio, actual: 50 150 138 28 7 2 1 42 5 1 2 4 0 384
Bryce Teodosio, projected: 50 152 140 27 7 2 1 40 5 1 2 4 0 359
Mike Trout, actual: 130 556 456 106 14 1 26 200 87 0 6 6 1 915
Mike Trout, projected: 130 562 465 137 25 4 32 265 83 0 5 8 0 1400
LaMonte Wade Jr., actual: 30 73 65 11 0 0 1 14 6 0 0 2 0 359
LaMonte Wade Jr., projected: 30 74 63 15 3 0 2 24 9 1 0 1 0 725
Taylor Ward, actual: 157 663 579 132 31 2 36 275 75 0 6 3 0 828
Taylor Ward, projected: 157 670 590 145 29 2 27 259 66 0 6 7 0 811
Angels, Actual: 162 6000 5374 1209 212 17 226 2133 484 13 35 87 7 666
Angels, Projected: 162 6061 5409 1296 238 24 216 2237 512 16 33 87 4 711


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.225 0.240
Slugging Average: 0.397 0.414
Walks (per PA): 0.081 0.084
SOs (per PA): 0.271 0.252
On-Base Average: 0.298 0.314
Power Factor: 1.764 1.726
OPS: 0.695 0.727
Runs Expected from Actual Stats: 666
Runs Expected from Projected Stats: 711
Actual Runs Scored: 673

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 29 September 2025, at 12:00 pm Pacific Time.