Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Angels 2025 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Angels Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 23 June 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.978)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
José Soriano, actual: 16 395 345 89 12 0 3 110 43 38 279 2 2 2 3 0 3 579
José Soriano, projected: 16 386 334 79 12 1 6 108 41 41 279 1 3 7 3 1 2 587
Yusei Kikuchi, actual: 16 385 339 85 13 0 11 131 43 35 269 0 2 1 2 3 4 702
Yusei Kikuchi, projected: 16 377 340 87 16 1 15 150 32 47 269 1 2 3 3 0 4 770
Kyle Hendricks, actual: 15 351 320 85 20 2 14 151 23 47 246 0 4 4 2 3 11 840
Kyle Hendricks, projected: 15 343 316 79 15 1 10 127 19 37 246 2 2 3 3 1 6 648
Jack Kochanowicz, actual: 16 358 309 89 7 0 15 141 38 51 246 0 5 6 1 2 4 884
Jack Kochanowicz, projected: 16 350 312 88 12 0 12 137 27 45 246 1 3 8 3 2 3 770
Tyler Anderson, actual: 15 357 320 82 19 1 15 148 31 45 243 0 3 3 4 3 8 894
Tyler Anderson, projected: 15 349 315 80 17 2 12 136 27 42 243 2 3 3 2 1 5 756
Reid Detmers, actual: 30 143 126 32 7 0 2 45 17 17 99 0 0 0 0 3 2 626
Reid Detmers, projected: 30 140 124 31 7 0 4 52 13 18 99 0 1 2 1 1 4 745
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Brock Burke, actual: 36 140 117 35 4 2 4 55 15 14 92 3 3 2 1 4 2 984
Brock Burke, projected: 36 137 123 32 6 1 5 54 10 16 92 1 1 1 1 2 1 779
Ryan Zeferjahn, actual: 33 124 108 26 4 0 6 48 14 15 85 0 0 2 0 0 2 832
Ryan Zeferjahn, projected: 33 121 105 21 3 0 4 36 13 12 85 0 1 3 0 1 1 589
Kenley Jansen, actual: 30 115 106 26 3 1 6 49 9 13 80 0 0 0 1 1 8 892
Kenley Jansen, projected: 30 112 102 19 3 0 3 31 9 9 80 0 1 1 1 1 4 513
Connor Brogdon, actual: 17 74 65 15 2 0 4 29 7 12 53 1 1 0 0 1 1 738
Connor Brogdon, projected: 17 72 65 15 3 0 3 28 6 9 53 0 1 0 0 0 2 715
Hunter Strickland, actual: 15 66 57 10 4 0 1 17 8 4 50 0 1 0 1 1 0 418
Hunter Strickland, projected: 15 65 57 13 3 0 2 21 6 6 50 0 1 1 0 0 1 605
Ryan Johnson, actual: 14 72 66 24 1 0 4 37 5 15 44 0 1 0 0 1 0 1396
Ryan Johnson, projected: 14 70 65 23 1 0 4 36 5 15 44 0 1 0 0 1 0 1389
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Héctor Neris, actual: 20 55 47 10 3 0 2 19 6 8 39 1 0 1 0 0 1 652
Héctor Neris, projected: 20 54 48 10 2 0 2 18 5 5 39 0 0 1 0 0 1 616
Shaun Anderson, actual: 6 50 47 16 1 0 4 29 3 9 32 0 0 0 0 0 1 1343
Shaun Anderson, projected: 6 49 44 14 3 0 2 22 4 8 32 0 0 0 1 0 0 1080
Garrett McDaniels, actual: 10 50 41 13 2 0 2 21 8 8 32 0 0 1 0 0 4 1212
Garrett McDaniels, projected: 10 49 40 13 2 0 2 21 8 8 32 0 0 1 0 0 4 1231
Ian Anderson, actual: 7 51 44 17 2 0 2 25 7 13 28 0 0 0 0 1 1 1757
Ian Anderson, projected: 7 50 44 11 2 0 1 17 5 6 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
José Fermín, actual: 10 45 39 10 0 0 2 16 5 7 28 0 0 1 0 0 0 1007
José Fermín, projected: 10 44 38 10 0 0 2 16 5 7 28 0 0 1 0 0 0 1021
Michael Darrell-Hicks, actual: 6 38 31 10 1 0 1 14 4 8 23 0 2 1 1 0 2 1496
Michael Darrell-Hicks, projected: 6 37 30 10 1 0 1 14 4 8 23 0 2 1 1 0 2 1539
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Caden Dana, actual: 2 29 23 7 1 0 2 14 5 5 18 0 1 0 0 0 2 1515
Caden Dana, projected: 2 28 23 7 1 0 2 16 4 6 18 0 1 0 0 0 1 1458
Jake Eder, actual: 5 21 17 2 0 0 1 5 4 2 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 443
Jake Eder, projected: 5 21 16 3 0 0 1 5 3 2 16 0 0 1 0 1 1 551
Sam Bachman, actual: 4 17 16 2 1 0 0 3 1 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 80
Sam Bachman, projected: 4 17 14 3 0 0 0 4 2 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 284
Ben Joyce, actual: 5 20 19 5 1 1 1 11 1 4 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 1283
Ben Joyce, projected: 5 20 17 4 0 0 0 5 2 2 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 454
Carl Edwards Jr., actual: 2 13 11 4 0 0 1 7 1 3 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 1301
Carl Edwards Jr., projected: 2 13 11 2 0 0 0 3 2 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
Víctor Mederos, actual: 1 13 10 2 1 1 0 5 3 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 830
Víctor Mederos, projected: 1 13 10 3 1 0 0 5 3 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Sam Aldegheri, actual: 1 10 7 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 7 0 1 1 1 0 0 819
Sam Aldegheri, projected: 1 10 8 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Touki Toussaint, actual: 1 11 10 4 1 0 0 5 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1633
Touki Toussaint, projected: 1 11 9 2 0 0 0 4 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 648
Robert Stephenson, actual: 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robert Stephenson, projected: 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicky Lopez, actual: 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 875
Nicky Lopez, projected: 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2268
Angels, Actual: 78 3008 2644 701 110 8 103 1136 304 380 2065 7 27 25 18 24 57 396
Angels, Projected: 78 2943 2615 663 110 6 93 1071 258 358 2065 8 23 37 19 12 42 352


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.265 0.254
Slugging Average: 0.430 0.410
Walks (per PA): 0.101 0.088
SOs (per PA): 0.201 0.215
On-Base Average: 0.343 0.327
Power Factor: 1.621 1.615
OPS: 0.773 0.736
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 396
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 352
Actual Runs Scored: 380

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2025 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 24 June 2025, at 4:01 am Pacific Time.