Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Angels 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Angels Projected Pitching

Through games of Saturday, 18 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.993)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Sam Aldegheri, actual: 9 151 130 31 4 1 5 52 17 21 101 0 3 1 1 0 1 863
Sam Aldegheri, projected: 9 150 124 34 6 1 5 56 19 24 101 0 3 4 2 0 2 1080
Shaun Anderson, actual: 9 73 63 17 1 0 3 27 8 13 50 1 0 1 0 0 1 806
Shaun Anderson, projected: 9 73 65 20 4 0 3 33 6 12 50 0 0 1 1 0 0 990
Sam Bachman, actual: 36 179 157 34 7 0 6 59 20 19 127 0 0 2 1 0 4 660
Sam Bachman, projected: 36 178 154 37 6 1 4 54 21 21 127 1 0 2 2 1 3 702
Reid Detmers, actual: 20 474 426 93 20 2 12 153 35 56 344 1 7 4 3 0 11 606
Reid Detmers, projected: 20 471 418 103 21 2 14 170 42 60 344 0 4 6 2 2 13 713
Mitch Farris, actual: 19 171 152 42 8 0 8 74 18 19 121 0 0 1 0 0 2 809
Mitch Farris, projected: 19 170 149 40 8 1 7 73 18 23 121 0 2 1 0 0 2 827
José Fermin, actual: 27 127 109 21 5 0 3 35 16 10 90 0 0 2 0 1 5 577
José Fermin, projected: 27 126 107 21 4 0 5 39 18 14 90 0 0 1 0 1 3 678
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Adam Frazier, actual: 3 14 12 7 1 0 1 11 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4143
Adam Frazier, projected: 3 14 12 7 1 0 1 11 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4158
Ryan Johnson, actual: 9 149 132 37 4 0 9 68 13 30 100 0 3 1 3 0 0 1067
Ryan Johnson, projected: 9 148 133 41 3 0 9 70 12 30 100 0 3 1 2 1 0 1134
Brett Kerry, actual: 1 16 15 3 1 0 0 4 1 2 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 425
Brett Kerry, projected: 1 16 15 3 1 0 0 4 1 2 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 486
Yusei Kikuchi, actual: 7 142 124 35 11 0 3 55 14 20 93 0 3 1 0 0 1 941
Yusei Kikuchi, projected: 7 141 127 33 6 0 5 56 12 18 93 0 1 1 1 0 2 833
George Klassen, actual: 2 32 22 7 2 0 1 12 10 7 14 0 0 0 1 0 2 2857
George Klassen, projected: 2 32 22 7 2 0 1 12 10 7 14 0 0 0 1 0 2 2835
Jack Kochanowicz, actual: 13 296 251 65 6 2 7 96 36 47 192 0 4 5 3 1 1 907
Jack Kochanowicz, projected: 13 294 257 74 9 1 10 113 28 45 192 0 3 5 3 2 2 935
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Joey Lucchesi, actual: 5 24 17 7 1 0 1 11 6 6 10 0 0 1 0 0 1 3280
Joey Lucchesi, projected: 5 24 21 5 1 0 1 9 2 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1166
Alek Manoah, actual: 3 39 31 8 3 1 1 16 8 9 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 1433
Alek Manoah, projected: 3 39 34 7 1 0 1 12 4 4 22 0 0 1 0 0 1 702
Samy Natera, actual: 13 63 54 8 4 0 1 15 8 5 46 0 0 1 0 0 0 406
Samy Natera, projected: 13 63 54 8 4 0 1 15 8 5 46 0 0 1 0 0 0 411
Drew Pomeranz, actual: 25 108 92 25 4 0 5 44 12 14 70 1 1 2 0 4 5 1019
Drew Pomeranz, projected: 25 107 94 23 4 0 3 37 11 12 70 1 1 1 1 0 2 765
Grayson Rodriguez, actual: 8 168 142 45 16 1 5 78 17 34 105 0 5 4 3 1 0 1310
Grayson Rodriguez, projected: 8 167 150 39 8 1 5 65 14 21 105 0 1 2 1 0 1 830
Jordan Romano, actual: 11 42 35 11 4 0 1 18 6 9 24 0 0 1 0 0 2 1482
Jordan Romano, projected: 11 42 37 8 1 0 1 14 4 5 24 0 0 1 0 0 2 795
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Nick Sandlin, actual: 8 40 31 9 2 0 2 17 5 11 26 0 1 3 1 0 2 1268
Nick Sandlin, projected: 8 40 34 7 1 0 1 12 5 4 26 0 0 1 0 0 1 608
Tayler Saucedo, actual: 6 15 14 5 2 0 1 10 0 2 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 1255
Tayler Saucedo, projected: 6 15 13 3 1 0 0 5 1 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 513
Chase Silseth, actual: 42 156 132 30 4 1 3 45 20 13 107 1 2 1 0 1 10 735
Chase Silseth, projected: 42 155 134 32 6 0 6 57 18 18 107 1 1 1 0 1 5 795
José Soriano, actual: 20 466 406 90 8 0 12 134 53 46 333 2 1 4 2 1 4 577
José Soriano, projected: 20 463 402 93 14 1 9 136 50 52 333 2 2 6 3 1 3 583
Brent Suter, actual: 36 232 215 58 9 4 6 93 14 33 166 1 0 1 2 1 4 714
Brent Suter, projected: 36 230 213 54 9 1 7 86 14 26 166 1 1 2 1 1 1 648
Walbert Ureña, actual: 17 354 299 61 13 0 5 89 46 33 244 0 2 7 3 1 6 603
Walbert Ureña, projected: 17 352 297 61 13 0 5 88 46 33 244 0 2 7 3 1 6 600
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Kirby Yates, actual: 25 91 78 15 6 0 2 27 8 10 65 1 1 3 1 0 6 633
Kirby Yates, projected: 25 90 79 16 3 0 3 28 9 9 65 0 1 1 1 1 3 629
Ryan Zeferjahn, actual: 39 195 155 23 5 1 4 42 31 21 135 0 1 7 1 3 10 593
Ryan Zeferjahn, projected: 39 194 160 30 5 0 6 54 27 21 135 0 1 5 1 3 6 660
Angels, Actual: 99 3817 3294 787 151 13 107 1285 424 494 2613 8 34 54 26 14 78 470
Angels, Projected: 99 3794 3305 806 142 9 113 1309 402 475 2613 6 26 51 26 15 60 461


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.239 0.244
Slugging Average: 0.390 0.396
Walks (per PA): 0.111 0.106
SOs (per PA): 0.228 0.226
On-Base Average: 0.332 0.333
Power Factor: 1.633 1.624
OPS: 0.722 0.729
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 470
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 461
Actual Runs Scored: 494

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Sunday, 19 July 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.