Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Dodgers 2025 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Dodgers Projected Pitching

Through games of Sunday, 28 September 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.991)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Anthony Banda, actual: 71 268 229 45 10 1 8 81 34 23 195 0 3 2 0 6 9 582
Anthony Banda, projected: 71 266 232 61 13 2 7 98 26 31 195 1 3 4 2 4 4 753
Ben Casparius, actual: 46 333 307 78 22 1 8 126 21 41 233 1 1 3 1 0 8 711
Ben Casparius, projected: 46 330 303 78 21 1 7 122 22 39 233 1 1 3 1 0 9 704
Noah Davis, actual: 5 35 26 10 0 0 3 19 5 14 18 0 0 4 0 0 1 2354
Noah Davis, projected: 5 35 30 11 1 0 2 18 3 8 18 0 0 1 0 0 0 1685
Alexis Díaz, actual: 9 38 34 7 1 1 2 16 2 5 27 0 0 2 0 0 0 774
Alexis Díaz, projected: 9 38 31 6 1 0 1 9 5 4 27 0 0 1 0 0 1 576
Jack Dreyer, actual: 67 307 276 56 14 2 4 86 24 26 229 3 4 0 1 5 5 441
Jack Dreyer, projected: 67 304 273 55 14 2 4 85 24 26 229 3 4 0 1 5 5 440
Julian Fernández, actual: 1 9 8 2 0 0 1 5 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1210
Julian Fernández, projected: 1 9 8 1 0 0 1 4 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
J.P. Feyereisen, actual: 2 14 13 8 1 0 1 12 1 4 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 4569
J.P. Feyereisen, projected: 2 14 12 2 0 0 0 4 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 567
Luis García, actual: 28 126 109 34 10 2 1 51 16 17 82 1 0 0 0 4 1 913
Luis García, projected: 28 125 110 28 5 0 3 42 13 14 82 1 1 1 1 1 3 781
Paul Gervase, actual: 1 9 8 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 557
Paul Gervase, projected: 1 9 8 2 0 0 1 4 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
Tyler Glasnow, actual: 18 366 316 56 12 0 10 98 43 33 271 0 4 3 0 0 10 508
Tyler Glasnow, projected: 18 363 325 68 14 2 11 118 34 39 271 1 1 2 2 1 13 576
Yoendrys Gómez, actual: 3 25 23 10 1 0 2 17 2 7 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 2557
Yoendrys Gómez, projected: 3 25 21 5 1 0 1 9 2 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Tony Gonsolin, actual: 7 157 135 33 3 0 9 63 18 21 108 1 0 3 0 0 2 861
Tony Gonsolin, projected: 7 156 139 28 6 0 5 49 14 15 108 1 1 1 1 0 2 579
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Andrew Heaney, actual: 1 11 10 4 1 0 1 8 1 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2217
Andrew Heaney, projected: 1 11 10 2 1 0 0 4 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Edgardo Henriquez, actual: 22 78 72 17 3 0 2 26 5 5 57 0 1 0 1 0 1 598
Edgardo Henriquez, projected: 22 77 71 16 3 0 2 24 6 5 57 0 1 0 1 0 2 604
Kiké Hernández, actual: 5 37 28 11 2 0 1 16 8 11 16 0 1 0 1 0 0 3073
Kiké Hernández, projected: 5 37 30 11 2 0 1 17 6 10 16 0 1 0 1 0 0 2527
Clayton Kershaw, actual: 23 463 420 102 22 2 8 152 35 46 338 2 4 2 2 0 0 553
Clayton Kershaw, projected: 23 459 422 89 17 1 10 138 29 36 338 4 2 2 4 1 3 458
Will Klein, actual: 14 70 57 14 4 0 0 18 10 6 46 0 1 2 0 0 2 750
Will Klein, projected: 14 69 57 17 5 0 0 22 10 10 46 0 1 1 0 0 1 926
Landon Knack, actual: 10 185 162 40 7 1 10 79 19 25 127 0 2 2 1 0 3 921
Landon Knack, projected: 10 183 166 38 6 1 9 75 14 21 127 0 1 2 1 0 4 794
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Michael Kopech, actual: 14 53 40 6 0 0 0 6 13 3 33 0 0 0 1 0 0 585
Michael Kopech, projected: 14 53 45 10 2 0 2 18 7 6 33 0 1 1 0 0 2 891
Jack Little, actual: 2 14 12 4 0 1 0 6 1 2 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 1176
Jack Little, projected: 2 14 12 4 0 1 0 6 1 2 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 1134
Ryan Loutos, actual: 2 16 13 4 1 0 1 8 2 5 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 1646
Ryan Loutos, projected: 2 16 13 4 0 0 1 8 2 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 1539
Dustin May, actual: 19 451 396 97 17 6 16 174 43 60 312 2 2 8 3 3 16 823
Dustin May, projected: 19 447 398 91 15 2 13 149 37 50 312 1 2 8 5 1 11 665
Bobby Miller, actual: 2 28 25 11 2 0 2 19 2 7 15 0 0 1 0 1 0 2213
Bobby Miller, projected: 2 28 25 6 1 0 1 11 2 4 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 891
Shohei Ohtani, actual: 14 188 176 40 6 0 3 55 9 15 141 0 3 0 1 0 1 466
Shohei Ohtani, projected: 14 186 167 34 6 0 5 55 16 16 141 0 1 2 1 0 1 498
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Evan Phillips, actual: 7 22 20 4 0 0 0 4 2 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 2 329
Evan Phillips, projected: 7 22 19 4 1 0 0 6 2 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 347
Miguel Rojas, actual: 4 28 25 11 3 0 3 23 2 7 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 2539
Miguel Rojas, projected: 4 28 25 9 3 0 2 17 2 5 15 0 0 1 1 0 0 1904
Roki Sasaki, actual: 10 161 136 30 5 1 6 55 22 18 109 0 0 3 0 0 4 803
Roki Sasaki, projected: 10 160 135 30 5 1 6 54 22 18 109 0 0 3 0 0 4 810
Matt Sauer, actual: 10 129 117 35 6 1 6 61 8 23 89 0 2 2 1 0 0 957
Matt Sauer, projected: 10 128 113 35 6 1 5 59 11 22 89 0 2 2 1 0 0 1053
Tanner Scott, actual: 61 238 213 54 7 2 11 98 18 33 171 1 2 4 0 2 1 743
Tanner Scott, projected: 61 236 202 45 7 1 5 69 28 26 171 1 2 3 2 2 2 621
Emmet Sheehan, actual: 15 291 265 49 10 2 7 84 22 29 220 0 2 2 3 0 0 455
Emmet Sheehan, projected: 15 288 259 51 11 2 10 94 26 33 220 0 2 2 2 0 2 551
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Blake Snell, actual: 11 254 222 51 10 0 3 70 26 21 184 3 3 0 3 1 6 539
Blake Snell, projected: 11 252 222 47 10 0 6 75 27 23 184 1 1 1 2 0 6 560
Brock Stewart, actual: 4 20 17 6 1 0 0 7 2 2 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 1383
Brock Stewart, projected: 4 20 17 5 1 0 1 8 2 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1053
Chris Stratton, actual: 3 17 15 3 1 0 2 10 2 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 1111
Chris Stratton, projected: 3 17 15 4 1 0 0 6 2 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 540
Blake Treinen, actual: 32 129 107 30 5 0 4 47 19 18 80 0 1 2 0 4 11 1154
Blake Treinen, projected: 32 128 114 26 4 0 2 37 12 11 80 0 1 1 1 1 3 623
Lou Trivino, actual: 26 115 99 29 4 1 2 41 8 12 79 1 3 4 0 1 3 828
Lou Trivino, projected: 26 114 99 24 4 0 3 36 12 13 79 0 1 2 1 1 2 717
José Ureña, actual: 2 13 12 4 2 0 0 6 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 704
José Ureña, projected: 2 13 11 3 1 0 0 5 1 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 567
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Alex Vesia, actual: 68 237 204 37 7 0 9 71 22 21 179 2 4 5 0 3 4 517
Alex Vesia, projected: 68 235 203 38 7 0 7 67 26 22 179 1 2 2 1 3 4 512
Justin Wrobleski, actual: 24 280 255 65 14 0 6 97 17 34 200 2 3 3 0 1 6 633
Justin Wrobleski, projected: 24 277 251 63 15 0 10 107 21 37 200 1 2 3 1 1 6 716
Yoshinobu Yamamoto, actual: 30 684 619 113 20 0 14 175 59 53 521 2 1 3 4 0 7 395
Yoshinobu Yamamoto, projected: 30 678 618 123 26 1 14 193 52 55 521 2 3 3 5 0 6 437
Kirby Yates, actual: 50 178 159 38 17 0 9 82 17 26 124 0 1 1 0 0 8 884
Kirby Yates, projected: 50 176 155 31 6 0 6 55 17 17 124 0 1 3 1 1 5 625
Dodgers, Actual: 162 6077 5380 1250 251 24 175 2074 563 683 4323 21 48 65 25 33 112 662
Dodgers, Projected: 162 6026 5366 1205 242 18 164 1977 541 638 4323 19 38 56 39 22 103 619


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.232 0.225
Slugging Average: 0.386 0.368
Walks (per PA): 0.093 0.090
SOs (per PA): 0.248 0.256
On-Base Average: 0.310 0.300
Power Factor: 1.659 1.641
OPS: 0.696 0.669
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 662
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 619
Actual Runs Scored: 683

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 29 September 2025, at 12:00 pm Pacific Time.