Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Dodgers 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Dodgers Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 10 August 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.008)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Charlie Barnes, actual: 4 46 42 13 2 0 3 24 4 7 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1150
Charlie Barnes, projected: 4 46 40 12 3 0 1 19 4 7 30 0 0 1 0 0 0 891
Ben Casparius, actual: 5 23 19 6 0 0 1 9 4 5 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 1281
Ben Casparius, projected: 5 23 21 5 1 0 1 9 2 3 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 907
Edwin Díaz, actual: 13 59 50 17 2 2 3 32 8 12 33 0 0 1 0 2 4 1895
Edwin Díaz, projected: 13 59 53 10 1 0 2 17 5 5 33 0 0 1 0 0 2 710
Jack Dreyer, actual: 49 190 173 35 5 0 7 61 14 17 144 2 0 1 1 2 3 495
Jack Dreyer, projected: 49 191 173 35 7 1 4 57 15 17 144 2 2 0 1 3 3 463
Jake Eder, actual: 4 15 13 3 1 0 0 4 1 1 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 379
Jake Eder, projected: 4 15 13 3 1 0 0 5 2 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Paul Gervase, actual: 4 34 29 7 0 0 0 7 5 2 23 0 0 0 0 0 3 649
Paul Gervase, projected: 4 34 29 7 0 0 1 12 5 3 23 0 0 0 0 0 1 810
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tyler Glasnow, actual: 7 148 134 20 5 1 5 42 13 12 119 0 1 0 1 1 6 392
Tyler Glasnow, projected: 7 149 134 27 6 1 5 48 14 16 119 0 1 1 1 0 5 555
Edgardo Henriquez, actual: 46 190 161 29 6 1 1 40 22 22 140 2 0 5 0 0 3 378
Edgardo Henriquez, projected: 46 191 166 33 6 1 2 46 20 19 140 1 1 3 1 0 3 458
Jonathan Hernández, actual: 15 98 86 20 4 0 4 36 12 16 67 0 0 0 1 1 2 800
Jonathan Hernández, projected: 15 99 84 20 3 1 3 33 12 13 67 1 1 1 0 1 1 778
Kyle Hurt, actual: 37 166 143 32 5 0 4 49 21 19 115 1 0 1 1 1 3 644
Kyle Hurt, projected: 37 167 147 34 6 0 3 50 18 18 115 1 0 1 1 1 4 604
Cole Irvin, actual: 1 30 26 8 2 0 1 13 3 6 18 0 0 1 1 0 0 1336
Cole Irvin, projected: 1 30 28 8 1 0 1 12 2 4 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Will Klein, actual: 36 189 165 44 4 0 3 57 21 22 125 0 0 3 1 2 2 750
Will Klein, projected: 36 190 162 45 8 0 2 58 24 24 125 0 1 3 1 1 3 833
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Landon Knack, actual: 2 24 20 6 1 0 4 19 2 5 15 0 1 1 0 0 1 1923
Landon Knack, projected: 2 24 22 5 1 0 1 10 2 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 810
Eric Lauer, actual: 10 227 207 49 7 0 11 89 13 23 167 2 2 3 2 0 3 678
Eric Lauer, projected: 10 229 205 51 9 1 9 89 19 27 167 1 1 1 2 1 2 729
Chayce McDermott, actual: 2 10 10 3 0 1 1 8 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1314
Chayce McDermott, projected: 2 10 8 2 0 0 1 5 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1296
Wyatt Mills, actual: 6 36 24 5 0 0 0 5 9 5 19 1 0 2 1 1 1 1098
Wyatt Mills, projected: 6 36 29 8 1 0 0 11 5 5 19 0 1 1 0 0 0 1026
Shohei Ohtani, actual: 14 340 305 55 13 0 4 80 26 21 257 1 2 6 1 0 3 365
Shohei Ohtani, projected: 14 343 307 61 12 0 8 99 29 28 257 0 2 4 2 0 2 474
Evan Phillips, actual: 13 44 41 10 1 0 4 23 2 5 32 0 1 0 0 1 2 930
Evan Phillips, projected: 13 44 39 8 2 0 1 13 4 5 32 0 0 1 0 0 1 536
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Miguel Rojas, actual: 4 23 21 9 2 0 2 17 1 6 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 2485
Miguel Rojas, projected: 4 23 21 8 2 0 2 15 1 5 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 2147
Roki Sasaki, actual: 20 446 399 94 27 2 21 188 40 55 315 1 1 5 1 0 8 785
Roki Sasaki, projected: 20 449 396 92 24 2 20 180 46 54 315 1 1 6 1 0 9 786
Tanner Scott, actual: 51 183 169 33 8 0 4 53 11 12 143 2 0 1 0 3 2 357
Tanner Scott, projected: 51 184 159 35 6 1 4 54 21 19 143 1 1 2 1 2 2 550
Emmet Sheehan, actual: 20 412 369 93 26 0 20 179 30 57 286 1 4 8 1 1 4 848
Emmet Sheehan, projected: 20 415 372 82 20 1 17 155 34 52 286 0 3 5 2 0 3 705
Tarik Skubal, actual: 2 45 40 8 2 0 2 16 4 5 33 0 0 1 0 0 2 641
Tarik Skubal, projected: 2 45 42 9 2 0 1 15 2 4 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 405
Blake Snell, actual: 1 18 16 6 0 0 0 6 2 5 9 0 0 0 1 0 2 2246
Blake Snell, projected: 1 18 16 3 1 0 0 5 2 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Brock Stewart, actual: 14 55 50 6 1 0 2 13 5 5 44 0 0 0 0 0 1 343
Brock Stewart, projected: 14 55 49 12 2 0 2 21 5 7 44 0 0 1 1 1 1 660
Blake Treinen, actual: 29 100 88 21 6 1 2 35 10 9 69 1 0 1 1 2 5 733
Blake Treinen, projected: 29 101 90 21 3 0 2 30 9 9 69 0 0 1 1 1 3 598
Alex Vesia, actual: 52 171 144 21 4 1 2 33 27 13 122 0 0 0 2 3 3 426
Alex Vesia, projected: 52 172 148 27 5 0 5 47 20 16 122 1 1 2 1 2 3 542
Justin Wrobleski, actual: 20 492 459 107 20 0 17 178 27 47 361 1 1 4 5 0 2 599
Justin Wrobleski, projected: 20 496 456 110 23 0 17 185 32 56 361 2 2 4 4 1 6 640
Yoshinobu Yamamoto, actual: 21 533 495 92 15 1 15 154 32 42 418 0 2 4 3 1 2 394
Yoshinobu Yamamoto, projected: 21 537 493 96 19 1 12 153 38 43 418 1 2 3 3 0 4 417
Dodgers, Actual: 119 4347 3898 852 169 10 143 1470 369 458 3149 15 16 49 24 21 68 448
Dodgers, Projected: 119 4375 3902 869 175 10 127 1453 394 468 3149 12 20 43 23 14 60 450


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.219 0.223
Slugging Average: 0.377 0.372
Walks (per PA): 0.085 0.090
SOs (per PA): 0.244 0.257
On-Base Average: 0.293 0.300
Power Factor: 1.725 1.672
OPS: 0.670 0.672
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 448
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 450
Actual Runs Scored: 458

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 11 August 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.