Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Marlins 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Marlins Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 31 August 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Sandy Alcantara, actual: 29 784 722 175 31 2 18 264 50 78 569 2 3 7 5 0 12 590
Sandy Alcantara, projected: 29 784 712 167 35 2 20 265 57 85 569 3 5 8 7 1 18 609
Lake Bachar, actual: 38 242 214 43 6 0 9 76 21 27 176 0 2 4 0 0 4 597
Lake Bachar, projected: 38 242 212 44 6 1 9 81 24 27 176 0 2 3 0 1 4 618
Anthony Bender, actual: 35 140 124 21 4 0 1 28 12 10 103 0 1 3 1 1 9 418
Anthony Bender, projected: 35 140 124 26 5 1 2 39 12 12 103 0 1 2 2 1 5 537
Zach Brzykcy, actual: 2 12 10 3 1 0 0 4 2 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 516
Zach Brzykcy, projected: 2 12 10 3 1 0 1 6 1 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1215
Josh Ekness, actual: 18 79 68 14 1 0 2 21 9 9 57 1 0 1 1 0 0 528
Josh Ekness, projected: 18 79 68 14 1 0 2 21 9 9 57 1 0 1 1 0 0 531
Pete Fairbanks, actual: 44 177 154 34 4 2 8 66 19 30 121 0 1 3 0 1 3 823
Pete Fairbanks, projected: 44 177 158 33 5 1 4 53 17 19 121 0 1 2 2 1 6 630
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Calvin Faucher, actual: 58 248 210 45 10 0 1 58 32 31 173 1 2 3 0 1 5 526
Calvin Faucher, projected: 58 248 215 53 8 2 4 77 27 31 173 1 2 3 1 1 6 709
Dax Fulton, actual: 8 66 54 11 1 2 0 16 11 8 48 0 1 0 0 0 2 543
Dax Fulton, projected: 8 66 54 11 1 2 0 16 11 8 48 0 1 0 0 0 2 547
Braxton Garrett, actual: 2 28 19 7 4 0 0 11 8 7 13 0 1 0 0 0 2 2754
Braxton Garrett, projected: 2 28 25 7 1 0 1 11 2 3 13 0 0 1 0 0 1 1134
Cade Gibson, actual: 34 180 149 41 6 0 3 56 19 29 119 2 4 6 3 1 4 886
Cade Gibson, projected: 34 180 154 37 7 0 3 53 18 21 119 1 2 5 2 2 3 710
Ryan Gusto, actual: 19 298 273 70 13 2 8 111 20 32 203 0 1 4 4 0 3 797
Ryan Gusto, projected: 19 298 270 73 13 1 10 119 22 39 203 0 2 4 3 0 4 861
Janson Junk, actual: 21 435 399 106 21 2 12 167 28 52 309 1 3 3 4 0 8 724
Janson Junk, projected: 21 435 404 113 24 1 12 176 21 57 309 1 5 3 3 0 10 748
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
William Kempner, actual: 9 50 44 8 2 0 1 13 4 4 37 0 0 2 0 0 1 450
William Kempner, projected: 9 50 44 8 2 0 1 13 4 4 37 0 0 2 0 0 1 450
John King, actual: 50 197 172 33 8 1 7 64 17 24 149 1 3 4 1 2 5 545
John King, projected: 50 197 179 48 6 0 5 70 13 23 149 1 2 2 2 1 4 658
Max Meyer, actual: 20 462 410 85 17 2 11 139 41 39 333 1 3 7 6 0 7 585
Max Meyer, projected: 20 462 416 102 23 2 18 182 37 55 333 0 3 5 5 0 6 761
Patrick Monteverde, actual: 1 18 17 5 1 1 1 11 1 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 1210
Patrick Monteverde, projected: 1 18 17 7 1 0 0 10 1 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
Andrew Nardi, actual: 25 99 86 21 5 0 4 38 11 13 68 1 0 1 0 0 0 772
Andrew Nardi, projected: 25 99 87 21 5 0 4 38 10 12 68 0 0 1 0 0 1 778
Chris Paddack, actual: 7 146 133 41 8 0 6 67 10 27 92 1 1 1 0 0 1 1130
Chris Paddack, projected: 7 146 135 35 7 1 6 61 8 20 92 1 1 1 1 0 1 879
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Eury Pérez, actual: 24 530 464 92 23 1 14 159 56 56 392 0 2 8 3 0 25 556
Eury Pérez, projected: 24 530 473 95 26 2 17 176 49 57 392 1 2 5 3 0 21 587
Michael Petersen, actual: 56 231 202 39 9 1 5 65 26 24 169 0 0 3 0 1 2 493
Michael Petersen, projected: 56 231 202 45 10 1 6 76 25 28 169 1 1 2 1 2 2 610
Tyler Phillips, actual: 32 454 404 99 12 3 14 159 45 45 316 1 0 3 4 0 13 747
Tyler Phillips, projected: 32 454 412 102 14 2 15 166 37 49 316 0 0 3 3 0 9 714
Jack Ralston, actual: 4 19 19 4 0 0 1 7 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 484
Jack Ralston, projected: 4 19 19 4 0 0 1 7 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Javier Sanoja, actual: 5 27 24 11 3 0 2 20 1 7 14 0 1 1 0 0 0 2721
Javier Sanoja, projected: 5 27 24 11 3 0 2 20 1 7 14 0 1 1 0 0 0 2722
Robby Snelling, actual: 1 22 18 5 1 0 1 9 4 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 902
Robby Snelling, projected: 1 22 18 5 1 0 1 9 4 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Victor Vodnik, actual: 9 44 34 4 0 1 0 6 7 4 29 0 1 2 0 0 0 532
Victor Vodnik, projected: 9 44 38 10 2 0 1 15 5 5 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 738
Josh White, actual: 1 8 3 1 0 0 1 4 4 5 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 7564
Josh White, projected: 1 8 3 1 0 0 1 4 4 5 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 7614
Tyler Zuber, actual: 34 130 122 33 4 1 6 57 6 15 92 0 0 2 2 0 5 846
Tyler Zuber, projected: 34 130 112 29 5 0 6 52 16 19 92 0 1 1 1 1 2 886
Marlins, Actual: 138 5126 4548 1051 195 21 136 1696 464 585 3635 12 30 69 34 7 111 563
Marlins, Projected: 138 5126 4585 1104 212 19 152 1816 435 606 3635 11 32 56 37 11 106 590


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.231 0.241
Slugging Average: 0.373 0.396
Walks (per PA): 0.091 0.085
SOs (per PA): 0.219 0.220
On-Base Average: 0.310 0.312
Power Factor: 1.614 1.645
OPS: 0.683 0.708
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 563
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 590
Actual Runs Scored: 585

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 1 September 2026, at 2:02 pm Pacific Time.