Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Marlins 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Marlins Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 20 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.996)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Sandy Alcantara, actual: 21 568 520 130 21 2 14 197 37 64 410 1 3 7 4 0 12 634
Sandy Alcantara, projected: 21 566 513 121 25 2 14 192 42 62 410 2 3 6 5 1 13 609
Lake Bachar, actual: 34 214 188 37 5 0 7 63 20 23 156 0 2 3 0 0 4 568
Lake Bachar, projected: 34 213 187 40 6 1 7 70 21 24 156 0 2 2 0 1 3 610
Anthony Bender, actual: 35 140 124 21 4 0 1 28 12 10 103 0 1 3 1 1 9 418
Anthony Bender, projected: 35 139 123 26 5 1 2 39 12 12 103 0 1 2 2 1 5 537
Zach Brzykcy, actual: 1 9 7 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 521
Zach Brzykcy, projected: 1 9 8 2 0 0 0 4 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Josh Ekness, actual: 6 22 17 2 0 0 0 2 5 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 271
Josh Ekness, projected: 6 22 17 2 0 0 0 2 5 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 270
Pete Fairbanks, actual: 33 139 121 32 4 2 8 64 14 28 91 0 1 3 0 1 2 1091
Pete Fairbanks, projected: 33 138 123 27 4 0 4 42 13 15 91 0 0 1 2 0 5 682
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Calvin Faucher, actual: 42 189 154 38 9 0 0 47 29 28 124 1 2 3 0 1 5 715
Calvin Faucher, projected: 42 188 162 41 6 1 3 60 21 24 124 1 2 3 1 1 5 779
Dax Fulton, actual: 4 39 34 5 1 2 0 10 5 3 30 0 0 0 0 0 1 376
Dax Fulton, projected: 4 39 34 5 1 2 0 10 5 3 30 0 0 0 0 0 1 365
Braxton Garrett, actual: 2 28 19 7 4 0 0 11 8 7 13 0 1 0 0 0 2 2754
Braxton Garrett, projected: 2 28 25 7 1 0 1 11 2 3 13 0 0 1 0 0 1 1134
Cade Gibson, actual: 20 115 96 25 6 0 1 34 10 15 77 1 3 5 2 1 4 825
Cade Gibson, projected: 20 115 99 23 5 0 1 33 10 11 77 1 1 4 1 1 2 616
Ryan Gusto, actual: 10 132 120 32 6 1 3 49 10 17 86 0 0 2 1 0 2 891
Ryan Gusto, projected: 10 131 118 33 6 0 4 53 10 19 86 0 1 2 1 0 2 923
Janson Junk, actual: 13 295 271 73 12 2 11 122 20 42 207 0 2 1 3 0 7 819
Janson Junk, projected: 13 294 274 77 16 1 9 123 14 41 207 1 3 2 2 0 7 785
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
William Kempner, actual: 9 50 44 8 2 0 1 13 4 4 37 0 0 2 0 0 1 450
William Kempner, projected: 9 50 44 8 2 0 1 13 4 4 37 0 0 2 0 0 1 450
John King, actual: 40 149 134 20 4 0 4 36 10 11 120 0 1 4 0 1 4 329
John King, projected: 40 148 136 36 4 0 3 52 9 16 120 1 1 1 1 1 3 559
Max Meyer, actual: 20 462 410 85 17 2 11 139 41 39 333 1 3 7 6 0 7 585
Max Meyer, projected: 20 460 415 102 23 2 18 181 37 55 333 0 3 5 5 0 6 761
Andrew Nardi, actual: 25 99 86 21 5 0 4 38 11 13 68 1 0 1 0 0 0 772
Andrew Nardi, projected: 25 99 87 21 5 0 4 38 10 12 68 0 0 1 0 0 1 778
Chris Paddack, actual: 7 146 133 41 8 0 6 67 10 27 92 1 1 1 0 0 1 1130
Chris Paddack, projected: 7 145 135 35 7 1 6 61 8 19 92 1 1 1 1 0 1 856
Eury Pérez, actual: 17 371 326 65 16 1 13 122 37 40 275 0 1 7 2 0 22 606
Eury Pérez, projected: 17 370 331 67 18 2 13 128 33 40 275 1 1 4 2 0 16 600
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Michael Petersen, actual: 41 171 152 26 7 1 4 47 17 16 130 0 0 2 0 1 1 411
Michael Petersen, projected: 41 170 150 33 8 1 5 57 18 21 130 1 1 2 1 2 2 605
Tyler Phillips, actual: 25 324 285 69 11 2 8 108 35 31 225 1 0 2 3 0 12 731
Tyler Phillips, projected: 25 323 292 72 11 1 10 117 27 34 225 0 0 2 2 0 7 687
Javier Sanoja, actual: 3 14 11 3 2 0 0 5 1 2 9 0 1 1 0 0 0 1083
Javier Sanoja, projected: 3 14 11 3 2 0 0 5 1 2 9 0 1 1 0 0 0 1080
Robby Snelling, actual: 1 22 18 5 1 0 1 9 4 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 902
Robby Snelling, projected: 1 22 18 5 1 0 1 9 4 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Josh White, actual: 1 8 3 1 0 0 1 4 4 5 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 7564
Josh White, projected: 1 8 3 1 0 0 1 4 4 5 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 7614
Tyler Zuber, actual: 15 58 53 15 1 0 2 22 3 6 39 0 0 2 2 0 1 920
Tyler Zuber, projected: 15 58 49 12 2 0 3 22 8 9 39 0 0 1 0 0 1 950
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Marlins, Actual: 101 3764 3326 762 147 15 100 1239 349 436 2664 7 22 57 24 6 97 417
Marlins, Projected: 101 3749 3354 799 158 15 110 1326 319 437 2664 9 21 44 26 8 82 426


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.229 0.238
Slugging Average: 0.373 0.395
Walks (per PA): 0.093 0.085
SOs (per PA): 0.228 0.225
On-Base Average: 0.311 0.311
Power Factor: 1.626 1.660
OPS: 0.684 0.706
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 417
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 426
Actual Runs Scored: 436

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 22 July 2026, at 5:30 am Pacific Time.