Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Brewers 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Brewers Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 20 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.015)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Grant Anderson, actual: 40 173 154 32 11 2 5 62 18 19 133 0 1 0 0 2 2 500
Grant Anderson, projected: 40 176 156 38 6 1 7 66 17 23 133 0 1 1 2 2 4 705
Aaron Ashby, actual: 47 254 221 54 7 0 5 76 29 26 173 0 2 2 2 1 3 708
Aaron Ashby, projected: 47 258 227 53 8 1 6 81 25 28 173 1 2 3 2 0 5 700
Coleman Crow, actual: 5 85 76 21 7 1 2 36 6 13 56 0 2 1 2 1 0 1010
Coleman Crow, projected: 5 86 77 21 7 1 2 37 6 13 56 0 2 1 2 1 0 1004
Shane Drohan, actual: 20 317 289 69 17 1 6 106 21 32 228 1 3 3 3 0 3 604
Shane Drohan, projected: 20 322 293 70 17 1 6 108 21 32 228 1 3 3 3 0 3 608
Brian Fitzpatrick, actual: 5 30 27 7 1 0 0 8 3 2 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 690
Brian Fitzpatrick, projected: 5 30 27 7 1 0 0 8 3 2 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 680
Robert Gasser, actual: 10 219 198 48 11 1 11 94 14 29 154 1 1 5 1 0 1 803
Robert Gasser, projected: 10 222 201 50 8 1 9 85 12 27 154 1 2 6 2 0 2 778
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
DL Hall, actual: 24 126 100 14 3 0 1 20 24 7 93 0 1 1 2 0 0 379
DL Hall, projected: 24 128 111 25 5 0 2 37 15 13 93 0 1 1 1 0 1 581
Kyle Harrison, actual: 17 341 317 70 14 1 10 116 20 28 251 0 0 4 4 0 2 561
Kyle Harrison, projected: 17 346 313 76 15 1 12 129 26 38 251 0 2 5 3 0 7 705
Logan Henderson, actual: 7 128 120 24 6 1 3 41 7 11 100 0 0 1 0 0 2 409
Logan Henderson, projected: 7 130 121 23 4 1 3 39 9 9 100 0 0 1 0 0 2 417
Jared Koenig, actual: 9 41 33 12 4 0 1 19 7 9 21 0 0 1 1 3 1 1950
Jared Koenig, projected: 9 42 37 9 2 0 1 14 4 4 21 0 0 1 0 0 0 864
Joel Kuhnel, actual: 10 49 41 13 1 0 4 26 6 9 29 0 0 2 0 1 1 1560
Joel Kuhnel, projected: 10 50 45 13 3 0 2 20 3 7 29 0 1 1 0 0 1 1053
Lance McCullers Jr., actual: 1 12 11 2 1 0 0 3 1 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 317
Lance McCullers Jr., projected: 1 12 11 2 1 0 0 4 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Easton McGee, actual: 2 6 5 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Easton McGee, projected: 2 6 6 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 162
Trevor Megill, actual: 39 152 138 26 7 0 0 33 10 13 114 2 1 1 0 1 5 323
Trevor Megill, projected: 39 154 139 34 7 0 3 51 12 18 114 1 2 1 1 1 6 631
Jacob Misiorowski, actual: 19 439 401 61 5 0 9 93 28 28 345 1 1 8 3 0 1 305
Jacob Misiorowski, projected: 19 446 400 70 9 1 11 112 37 39 345 1 1 7 2 0 1 401
Chad Patrick, actual: 31 309 276 63 13 2 8 104 28 29 229 3 2 0 1 2 1 541
Chad Patrick, projected: 31 314 282 68 14 1 8 108 26 30 229 2 2 2 1 1 3 596
Carlos Rodriguez, actual: 4 42 38 10 2 0 1 15 4 4 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 773
Carlos Rodriguez, projected: 4 43 37 12 2 0 1 19 5 6 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 932
Drew Rom, actual: 5 27 23 6 1 0 1 10 4 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 990
Drew Rom, projected: 5 27 24 8 2 0 1 14 3 5 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1296
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Brandon Sproat, actual: 18 352 302 73 15 0 15 133 39 48 246 2 0 9 1 0 8 777
Brandon Sproat, projected: 18 357 308 75 16 2 12 130 38 48 246 2 1 9 1 0 7 747
Garrett Stallings, actual: 2 11 10 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 93
Garrett Stallings, projected: 2 11 10 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 81
Abner Uribe, actual: 41 159 142 27 2 0 3 38 15 11 122 2 0 0 3 2 0 369
Abner Uribe, projected: 41 161 140 27 2 0 2 36 18 12 122 1 0 2 2 1 1 395
Bryse Wilson, actual: 2 13 13 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 44
Bryse Wilson, projected: 2 13 12 3 1 0 1 6 1 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 729
Jake Woodford, actual: 16 112 102 34 4 1 3 49 7 18 70 1 2 0 1 0 0 1189
Jake Woodford, projected: 16 114 102 29 5 1 4 47 8 16 70 0 2 2 1 0 1 1043
Brandon Woodruff, actual: 9 174 161 28 6 0 5 49 10 16 136 0 2 1 2 1 3 411
Brandon Woodruff, projected: 9 177 162 34 6 0 5 55 11 16 136 0 1 2 1 0 2 486
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Craig Yoho, actual: 12 63 54 6 2 0 3 17 7 7 48 0 0 2 0 0 0 464
Craig Yoho, projected: 12 64 51 9 2 0 2 18 10 9 48 1 1 2 0 0 0 581
Ángel Zerpa, actual: 12 55 48 16 3 0 2 25 6 11 38 1 0 0 0 0 2 918
Ángel Zerpa, projected: 12 56 51 14 3 0 2 22 4 6 38 0 0 1 1 0 0 783
Brewers, Actual: 100 3689 3300 720 144 10 98 1178 316 374 2687 14 18 41 27 14 35 350
Brewers, Projected: 100 3745 3343 772 146 12 102 1249 316 405 2687 11 24 51 26 6 46 387


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.218 0.231
Slugging Average: 0.357 0.374
Walks (per PA): 0.086 0.084
SOs (per PA): 0.264 0.254
On-Base Average: 0.293 0.305
Power Factor: 1.636 1.618
OPS: 0.650 0.679
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 350
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 387
Actual Runs Scored: 374

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 22 July 2026, at 5:30 am Pacific Time.