Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Brewers 2025 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Brewers Projected Pitching

Through games of Tuesday, 17 June 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.002)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Freddy Peralta, actual: 15 343 303 62 10 0 9 99 32 25 249 3 0 4 2 0 9 543
Freddy Peralta, projected: 15 344 304 63 14 1 10 109 32 36 249 2 1 4 2 0 5 583
Chad Patrick, actual: 16 337 304 76 17 0 8 117 26 31 239 1 2 4 0 1 4 643
Chad Patrick, projected: 16 338 305 76 17 0 8 117 26 31 239 1 2 4 0 1 4 638
Quinn Priester, actual: 13 280 251 58 16 0 6 92 26 28 203 1 1 1 1 0 3 569
Quinn Priester, projected: 13 281 249 66 15 0 10 110 26 39 203 1 2 3 1 0 3 785
Jose Quintana, actual: 9 208 185 48 3 0 6 69 21 22 145 1 0 1 1 0 3 698
Jose Quintana, projected: 9 208 190 49 10 1 5 75 15 22 145 1 1 1 2 1 2 666
Tyler Alexander, actual: 21 164 148 42 6 2 3 61 12 31 109 1 1 1 0 0 4 866
Tyler Alexander, projected: 21 164 152 41 8 1 7 70 9 21 109 0 1 1 1 0 2 864
Grant Anderson, actual: 30 152 133 28 2 0 5 45 18 16 106 0 1 0 2 1 3 677
Grant Anderson, projected: 30 152 136 35 3 0 8 61 15 21 106 0 1 1 1 2 4 864
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Abner Uribe, actual: 34 137 119 25 1 0 2 32 13 7 103 2 0 3 0 2 0 373
Abner Uribe, projected: 34 137 115 23 2 1 1 30 19 11 103 1 1 2 1 2 2 448
Jared Koenig, actual: 34 131 115 27 6 1 2 41 12 12 93 2 1 1 1 1 0 582
Jared Koenig, projected: 34 131 116 28 5 1 2 41 11 14 93 1 1 2 2 1 1 662
Nick Mears, actual: 31 104 99 16 2 1 2 26 3 8 88 0 2 0 0 0 1 248
Nick Mears, projected: 31 104 92 21 4 1 3 35 11 13 88 0 1 0 0 0 2 601
Aaron Civale, actual: 5 94 84 23 5 0 5 43 7 12 66 1 0 2 0 1 0 824
Aaron Civale, projected: 5 94 86 21 5 0 3 37 6 11 66 0 1 1 1 0 1 680
Trevor Megill, actual: 28 105 90 20 5 0 1 28 12 9 73 0 3 0 1 2 8 698
Trevor Megill, projected: 28 105 94 25 4 0 3 37 9 13 73 0 1 1 1 1 5 793
Logan Henderson, actual: 4 81 75 14 0 0 3 23 6 4 63 0 0 0 0 0 1 430
Logan Henderson, projected: 4 81 75 14 0 0 3 23 6 4 63 0 0 0 0 0 1 446
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tobias Myers, actual: 6 96 84 26 5 0 2 37 10 11 60 0 1 1 0 0 0 1057
Tobias Myers, projected: 6 96 87 22 3 0 3 34 7 9 60 0 1 1 1 0 1 810
Elvin Rodríguez, actual: 6 84 76 23 5 0 7 49 7 18 56 0 0 1 0 0 0 1187
Elvin Rodríguez, projected: 6 84 76 23 4 0 7 48 8 19 56 0 0 1 0 0 0 1215
Joel Payamps, actual: 23 84 75 25 6 4 3 48 6 17 55 0 3 0 0 1 0 1321
Joel Payamps, projected: 23 84 76 18 3 1 2 30 6 9 55 0 1 1 1 1 1 697
DL Hall, actual: 5 52 45 6 1 0 1 10 7 3 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 311
DL Hall, projected: 5 52 46 12 2 0 1 17 5 6 40 0 0 1 1 0 1 680
Rob Zastryzny, actual: 12 44 41 10 1 0 3 20 2 3 32 0 1 0 0 1 0 788
Rob Zastryzny, projected: 12 44 39 10 2 0 1 15 4 5 32 0 0 1 0 0 1 648
Bryan Hudson, actual: 12 54 39 8 2 0 0 10 12 7 31 1 0 2 2 2 4 1048
Bryan Hudson, projected: 12 54 47 8 2 0 1 14 5 4 31 0 0 1 0 0 1 527
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Aaron Ashby, actual: 5 33 31 6 1 0 0 7 1 0 27 0 0 1 0 0 0 192
Aaron Ashby, projected: 5 33 29 7 1 0 1 11 3 4 27 0 0 0 0 0 1 583
Nestor Cortes, actual: 2 38 31 7 1 0 5 23 7 8 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 1486
Nestor Cortes, projected: 2 38 35 8 2 0 2 14 3 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Elvis Peguero, actual: 6 36 31 8 1 0 1 12 4 6 22 0 0 1 1 0 0 1059
Elvis Peguero, projected: 6 36 32 8 1 0 1 12 4 5 22 0 0 0 0 0 1 864
Craig Yoho, actual: 5 28 20 7 1 0 1 11 6 6 17 0 1 1 0 0 0 1430
Craig Yoho, projected: 5 28 20 7 1 0 1 11 6 6 17 0 1 1 0 0 0 1426
Connor Thomas, actual: 2 31 26 12 2 0 3 23 2 12 16 0 2 1 0 0 0 2907
Connor Thomas, projected: 2 31 26 12 2 0 3 23 2 12 16 0 2 1 0 0 0 2916
Jacob Misiorowski, actual: 1 18 14 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 52
Jacob Misiorowski, projected: 1 18 14 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Jake Bauers, actual: 4 19 16 4 1 0 0 5 1 0 12 0 0 2 0 0 0 741
Jake Bauers, projected: 4 19 16 4 2 0 0 6 2 1 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 810
Easton McGee, actual: 2 15 14 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 227
Easton McGee, projected: 2 15 14 2 0 0 0 3 1 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 162
Carlos Rodríguez, actual: 1 18 14 5 3 0 0 8 4 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1587
Carlos Rodríguez, projected: 1 18 16 6 1 0 1 9 2 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1458
Brewers, Actual: 74 2786 2463 589 103 8 78 942 262 300 1966 13 19 27 11 12 40 307
Brewers, Projected: 74 2789 2487 609 113 7 87 992 247 324 1966 7 18 29 15 9 39 323


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.239 0.245
Slugging Average: 0.382 0.399
Walks (per PA): 0.094 0.089
SOs (per PA): 0.219 0.229
On-Base Average: 0.317 0.318
Power Factor: 1.599 1.629
OPS: 0.699 0.717
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 307
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 323
Actual Runs Scored: 300

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2025 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 18 June 2025, at 4:01 am Pacific Time.