Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Twins 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Twins Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.994)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Pablo López, actual: 772 715 180 33 0 26 291 41 2 4 8 2 654
Pablo López, projected: 767 702 171 35 3 23 281 48 2 4 10 1 627
Bailey Ober, actual: 709 655 136 29 5 27 256 43 1 4 6 0 530
Bailey Ober, projected: 705 656 149 29 4 27 269 38 1 4 6 0 577
Joe Ryan, actual: 538 507 110 24 6 19 203 23 0 3 5 0 550
Joe Ryan, projected: 535 496 111 24 3 21 203 30 0 3 6 0 609
Simeon Woods Richardson, actual: 569 509 125 21 1 16 196 48 2 7 3 0 687
Simeon Woods Richardson, projected: 566 505 125 21 1 17 197 49 3 6 3 0 709
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Cole Irvin, actual: 22 16 6 1 0 1 10 4 0 1 1 0 2463
Cole Irvin, projected: 22 20 5 1 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 0 736
Chris Paddack, actual: 384 360 102 16 0 14 160 21 0 2 1 0 795
Chris Paddack, projected: 382 355 89 17 2 14 153 19 2 2 2 0 680
Michael Tonkin, actual: 73 63 18 2 0 0 20 7 0 1 2 0 788
Michael Tonkin, projected: 73 65 16 3 0 2 27 6 0 1 1 0 735
Cole Sands, actual: 292 267 59 10 0 6 87 12 1 6 6 0 538
Cole Sands, projected: 290 260 62 13 0 8 98 21 1 3 6 0 700
Griffin Jax, actual: 276 256 47 7 3 4 72 15 1 1 2 1 355
Griffin Jax, projected: 274 249 56 10 2 9 96 19 1 2 3 0 622
Trevor Richards, actual: 59 44 8 1 0 0 9 11 0 2 2 0 771
Trevor Richards, projected: 59 51 12 2 0 2 21 6 0 0 0 0 653
David Festa, actual: 277 251 62 14 3 9 109 23 0 1 2 0 756
David Festa, projected: 275 250 62 14 3 9 108 23 0 1 2 0 765
Jorge Alcalá, actual: 235 210 40 8 1 8 74 20 0 1 3 1 543
Jorge Alcalá, projected: 234 210 44 6 0 9 79 19 0 2 2 0 552
Jhoan Durán, actual: 228 204 48 12 1 4 74 15 2 1 6 0 585
Jhoan Durán, projected: 227 202 44 7 1 5 67 17 2 1 4 0 513
Louie Varland, actual: 238 214 68 8 0 12 112 16 1 3 4 0 1201
Louie Varland, projected: 237 217 60 8 2 12 108 15 1 2 2 0 899
Caleb Thielbar, actual: 216 188 50 9 0 6 77 24 1 3 0 0 890
Caleb Thielbar, projected: 215 193 44 9 1 5 72 17 1 2 1 0 585
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Zebby Matthews, actual: 177 164 51 9 0 11 93 11 0 0 2 0 1149
Zebby Matthews, projected: 176 163 51 9 0 11 92 11 0 0 2 0 1164
Steven Okert, actual: 160 139 37 7 1 6 64 16 1 1 3 0 917
Steven Okert, projected: 159 137 30 7 0 5 54 16 2 1 3 0 646
Kody Funderburk, actual: 161 136 41 10 1 4 65 15 1 4 5 0 1191
Kody Funderburk, projected: 160 136 36 8 1 4 58 15 1 3 5 0 947
Matt Bowman, actual: 31 25 2 0 0 1 5 4 0 0 2 0 354
Matt Bowman, projected: 31 27 7 1 0 1 10 3 0 0 0 0 742
Jay Jackson, actual: 114 105 28 4 1 7 55 9 0 0 0 0 910
Jay Jackson, projected: 113 100 22 4 0 5 41 12 1 1 1 0 677
Josh Staumont, actual: 102 85 17 1 0 0 18 14 0 2 1 0 455
Josh Staumont, projected: 101 86 19 3 0 2 29 13 0 1 1 0 643
Scott Blewett, actual: 85 76 17 5 0 2 28 8 0 0 1 0 558
Scott Blewett, projected: 84 74 18 7 0 1 29 10 0 0 1 0 633
Ronny Henriquez, actual: 82 75 20 1 1 2 29 5 0 0 2 0 666
Ronny Henriquez, projected: 82 74 17 2 1 2 28 5 0 0 2 0 620
Brock Stewart, actual: 67 59 15 3 0 2 24 8 0 0 0 0 729
Brock Stewart, projected: 67 58 16 2 0 3 27 7 0 1 1 0 973
Diego Castillo, actual: 43 34 8 0 1 0 10 8 0 1 0 0 721
Diego Castillo, projected: 43 38 8 1 0 1 13 4 0 0 1 0 492
Randy Dobnak, actual: 45 40 11 2 1 1 18 5 0 0 0 0 936
Randy Dobnak, projected: 45 41 12 2 0 1 18 3 0 0 1 0 825
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Josh Winder, actual: 38 33 7 1 0 0 8 1 0 2 2 0 563
Josh Winder, projected: 38 34 9 2 0 1 15 3 0 1 1 0 837
Caleb Boushley, actual: 20 18 6 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 1058
Caleb Boushley, projected: 20 17 5 1 0 1 8 3 0 0 0 0 1097
Daniel Duarte, actual: 15 14 2 1 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 486
Daniel Duarte, projected: 15 12 3 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 982
Kyle Farmer, actual: 19 18 7 1 1 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 1364
Kyle Farmer, projected: 19 18 6 1 1 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 949
Brent Headrick, actual: 13 11 2 1 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 853
Brent Headrick, projected: 13 11 3 1 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 1034
Justin Topa, actual: 8 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 52
Justin Topa, projected: 8 7 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 379
Willi Castro, actual: 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Willi Castro, projected: 4 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 735
Matt Wallner, actual: 6 6 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 832
Matt Wallner, projected: 6 6 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 832
Twins, Actual: 6078 5509 1333 244 27 190 2201 433 13 50 69 4 683
Twins, Projected: 6045 5473 1317 251 25 204 2237 438 18 41 67 1 673
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.242 0.241
Slugging Average: 0.400 0.409
Walks (per PA): 0.071 0.072
SOs (per PA): 0.247 0.247
On-Base Average: 0.303 0.303
Power Factor: 1.651 1.699
OPS: 0.702 0.711
TPP Runs (to date): 735 683

Runs differential:
Actual Runs 52 greater than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.