Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Twins 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Twins Projected Pitching

Through games of Wednesday, 1 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.98)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Mick Abel, actual: 4 93 80 22 6 0 0 28 10 9 61 0 0 3 0 1 1 727
Mick Abel, projected: 4 91 81 22 3 1 3 34 9 13 61 0 0 1 0 0 1 891
Garrett Acton, actual: 4 28 23 4 2 0 0 6 3 5 20 0 1 1 1 1 0 511
Garrett Acton, projected: 4 27 22 5 3 0 1 12 4 5 20 0 0 1 0 1 0 810
Travis Adams, actual: 15 97 85 22 1 2 5 42 11 17 65 1 0 0 0 0 0 950
Travis Adams, projected: 15 95 81 23 4 1 4 41 10 17 65 0 2 1 0 0 1 1026
Orlando Arcia, actual: 1 5 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1096
Orlando Arcia, projected: 1 5 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
Anthony Banda, actual: 39 156 132 31 13 0 3 53 15 19 103 1 0 8 1 1 9 842
Anthony Banda, projected: 39 153 133 34 8 1 4 56 15 18 103 1 1 3 1 2 3 806
Taj Bradley, actual: 16 379 336 76 18 0 12 130 38 38 266 1 2 2 1 0 5 680
Taj Bradley, projected: 16 372 333 80 17 1 14 141 33 48 266 1 3 2 2 0 3 729
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Kody Funderburk, actual: 23 94 73 16 1 0 2 23 17 11 61 1 1 2 0 0 5 828
Kody Funderburk, projected: 23 92 78 20 4 0 2 30 10 10 61 0 1 2 1 0 3 838
Luis García, actual: 9 42 36 12 1 0 2 19 4 10 26 1 0 1 0 0 3 1303
Luis García, projected: 9 41 36 9 2 0 1 14 4 5 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 774
Yoendrys Gómez, actual: 26 92 82 13 2 1 1 20 8 5 69 0 0 2 1 0 0 361
Yoendrys Gómez, projected: 26 90 78 18 3 0 4 32 9 11 69 0 1 2 1 0 2 773
Alex Jackson, actual: 1 6 5 2 0 0 2 8 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3834
Alex Jackson, projected: 1 6 5 2 0 0 2 8 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3888
Zak Kent, actual: 2 20 15 4 0 1 2 12 5 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 2184
Zak Kent, projected: 2 20 17 4 1 0 1 7 2 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
John Klein, actual: 3 19 14 3 1 0 1 7 4 2 13 0 1 0 0 0 3 1140
John Klein, projected: 3 19 14 3 1 0 1 7 4 2 13 0 1 0 0 0 3 1134
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Cody Laweryson, actual: 15 78 66 15 3 0 3 27 8 12 50 0 2 2 2 0 1 1034
Cody Laweryson, projected: 15 76 66 14 2 0 2 23 6 10 50 1 2 1 1 0 1 713
Justin Lawrence, actual: 7 39 28 10 1 0 4 23 9 12 18 0 0 2 0 0 0 2885
Justin Lawrence, projected: 7 38 32 9 2 0 1 13 5 6 18 0 0 1 0 0 1 1273
Zebby Matthews, actual: 9 229 214 52 9 0 11 94 12 26 169 0 1 2 0 0 4 670
Zebby Matthews, projected: 9 225 207 58 10 0 10 98 14 32 169 1 2 1 1 0 3 810
Andrew Morris, actual: 30 171 153 42 5 1 2 55 13 20 118 1 2 2 1 1 2 698
Andrew Morris, projected: 30 168 150 41 5 1 2 54 13 20 118 1 2 2 1 1 2 686
Bailey Ober, actual: 12 281 259 63 16 0 12 115 18 36 200 1 0 2 1 0 7 735
Bailey Ober, projected: 12 276 256 61 13 1 11 111 15 32 200 0 2 2 1 0 2 662
Eric Orze, actual: 34 177 152 40 12 1 1 57 18 23 117 1 4 2 2 2 6 852
Eric Orze, projected: 34 174 150 38 9 1 3 58 18 20 117 0 2 3 1 1 6 800
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Mike Paredes, actual: 6 110 96 23 4 1 4 41 9 13 76 1 1 2 1 0 1 793
Mike Paredes, projected: 6 108 94 23 4 1 4 40 9 13 76 1 1 2 1 0 1 810
Connor Prielipp, actual: 12 273 237 62 11 2 6 95 23 42 185 3 4 5 3 0 5 820
Connor Prielipp, projected: 12 268 232 61 11 2 6 93 23 41 185 3 4 5 3 0 5 810
Marco Raya, actual: 2 17 15 4 0 0 1 7 2 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 820
Marco Raya, projected: 2 17 15 4 0 0 1 7 2 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Taylor Rogers, actual: 37 143 127 39 8 1 3 58 13 21 95 1 1 1 0 1 5 939
Taylor Rogers, projected: 37 140 126 30 6 0 4 48 10 15 95 1 1 2 1 1 2 674
Kendry Rojas, actual: 6 71 56 12 2 0 0 14 13 3 49 1 0 1 1 0 0 515
Kendry Rojas, projected: 6 70 55 12 2 0 0 14 13 3 49 1 0 1 1 0 0 513
Joe Ryan, actual: 18 400 370 83 19 0 10 132 22 44 292 0 3 5 3 0 14 588
Joe Ryan, projected: 18 392 363 81 18 1 14 144 22 43 292 0 2 5 2 0 9 603
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Cole Sands, actual: 12 50 44 12 1 1 2 21 4 6 35 1 1 0 0 0 0 835
Cole Sands, projected: 12 49 44 11 2 0 1 17 3 6 35 0 1 1 0 0 1 689
Justin Topa, actual: 23 92 78 27 3 0 4 42 11 18 57 0 2 1 1 0 3 1398
Justin Topa, projected: 23 90 82 23 4 0 2 32 6 12 57 0 1 1 1 1 2 852
Austin Voth, actual: 1 25 23 11 2 0 0 13 1 6 12 0 1 0 1 0 0 2908
Austin Voth, projected: 1 25 22 6 1 0 1 10 2 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Simeon Woods Richardson, actual: 12 227 197 65 15 0 9 107 25 46 143 2 1 2 2 0 5 1233
Simeon Woods Richardson, projected: 12 223 197 49 9 0 7 81 22 28 143 1 2 1 1 0 4 810
Twins, Actual: 88 3414 2999 766 156 11 102 1250 319 455 2329 17 28 48 22 7 80 442
Twins, Projected: 88 3350 2972 742 144 11 106 1226 286 422 2329 12 31 40 20 7 56 411


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.255 0.250
Slugging Average: 0.417 0.413
Walks (per PA): 0.093 0.085
SOs (per PA): 0.211 0.229
On-Base Average: 0.334 0.321
Power Factor: 1.632 1.652
OPS: 0.751 0.733
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 442
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 411
Actual Runs Scored: 455

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Thursday, 2 July 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.