Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Mets 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Mets Projected Pitching

Through games of Thursday, 4 June 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.982)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Huascar Brazobán, actual: 26 124 108 19 7 0 2 32 13 9 92 1 1 1 2 1 2 450
Huascar Brazobán, projected: 26 122 104 23 4 0 2 34 14 13 92 1 1 2 1 1 3 555
Daniel Duarte, actual: 1 7 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Duarte, projected: 1 7 6 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 162
Carl Edwards Jr., actual: 2 25 21 3 0 0 1 6 4 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 521
Carl Edwards Jr., projected: 2 25 21 4 1 0 1 7 3 2 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Luis García, actual: 6 32 30 11 6 0 0 17 2 6 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1369
Luis García, projected: 6 31 28 7 1 0 1 11 3 4 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 864
Joey Gerber, actual: 2 12 11 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 317
Joey Gerber, projected: 2 12 11 2 1 0 0 4 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 243
Clay Holmes, actual: 9 215 194 40 8 0 3 57 18 14 158 0 1 1 1 0 1 453
Clay Holmes, projected: 9 211 184 42 7 0 3 60 21 22 158 0 1 4 2 1 2 558
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Craig Kimbrel, actual: 14 64 56 16 3 1 3 30 6 12 45 1 1 0 0 1 0 871
Craig Kimbrel, projected: 14 63 55 9 2 0 1 16 7 5 45 0 0 1 0 0 2 417
Richard Lovelady, actual: 6 32 28 8 1 0 1 12 4 5 22 0 0 0 0 1 0 755
Richard Lovelady, projected: 6 31 27 7 2 0 1 11 3 4 22 0 0 1 0 0 0 783
Sean Manaea, actual: 13 176 152 41 8 2 4 65 16 23 117 2 2 4 1 0 4 895
Sean Manaea, projected: 13 173 158 38 7 1 6 64 12 20 117 1 1 2 1 0 2 710
Nolan McLean, actual: 12 276 243 50 11 0 8 85 24 36 199 0 1 8 0 0 1 566
Nolan McLean, projected: 12 271 241 49 9 0 7 79 23 29 199 0 1 6 1 0 1 513
A.J. Minter, actual: 4 13 12 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 388
A.J. Minter, projected: 4 13 11 3 1 0 0 4 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 365
Tobias Myers, actual: 20 134 126 29 8 0 6 55 7 17 100 1 0 0 0 1 2 604
Tobias Myers, projected: 20 132 121 30 5 0 4 48 8 13 100 1 1 1 1 0 1 608
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Freddy Peralta, actual: 13 309 275 65 13 1 9 107 30 31 216 1 1 2 2 0 2 691
Freddy Peralta, projected: 13 303 269 55 12 1 9 96 28 31 216 1 1 4 2 0 4 598
Cionel Pérez, actual: 2 11 11 2 0 0 1 5 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 588
Cionel Pérez, projected: 2 11 9 2 0 0 0 3 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
David Peterson, actual: 13 266 234 67 12 4 2 93 24 37 172 1 4 3 8 0 2 991
David Peterson, projected: 13 261 230 59 12 1 6 90 25 30 172 1 1 3 2 0 2 748
Jonathan Pintaro, actual: 2 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jonathan Pintaro, projected: 2 12 10 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 162
Brooks Raley, actual: 26 100 85 18 3 0 2 27 11 5 70 1 1 2 1 1 0 584
Brooks Raley, projected: 26 98 86 18 3 0 2 29 9 11 70 1 0 2 1 0 1 555
Christian Scott, actual: 7 135 114 26 6 0 1 35 16 11 91 0 0 5 0 0 2 625
Christian Scott, projected: 7 133 117 28 5 0 4 45 11 14 91 0 0 3 0 0 1 671
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Kodai Senga, actual: 5 97 83 26 4 0 5 45 13 21 60 0 0 1 0 0 1 1262
Kodai Senga, projected: 5 95 83 18 4 0 3 30 11 9 60 0 0 1 1 0 1 713
Zach Thornton, actual: 1 19 17 4 1 0 1 8 2 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 896
Zach Thornton, projected: 1 19 17 4 1 0 1 8 2 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 972
Jonah Tong, actual: 3 47 39 8 0 0 1 11 7 6 30 0 1 0 3 0 0 931
Jonah Tong, projected: 3 46 40 11 2 0 1 17 6 9 30 0 1 0 1 0 0 1026
Austin Warren, actual: 15 83 72 14 5 0 1 22 9 4 61 0 1 1 0 0 0 456
Austin Warren, projected: 15 81 73 17 4 0 2 27 7 6 61 0 1 1 0 1 1 572
Luke Weaver, actual: 25 108 97 19 1 1 2 28 8 8 81 1 1 1 0 0 0 425
Luke Weaver, projected: 25 106 96 25 5 1 4 42 8 14 81 1 1 1 1 0 0 758
Devin Williams, actual: 23 89 74 18 5 0 2 29 13 12 60 2 0 0 0 1 5 760
Devin Williams, projected: 23 87 76 13 3 0 1 20 10 8 60 0 0 1 1 0 3 472
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Mets, Actual: 62 2386 2100 490 103 9 55 776 230 264 1670 11 15 29 18 6 24 254
Mets, Projected: 62 2343 2073 466 91 4 59 748 217 253 1670 7 10 33 15 3 26 234


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.233 0.225
Slugging Average: 0.370 0.361
Walks (per PA): 0.096 0.093
SOs (per PA): 0.242 0.254
On-Base Average: 0.316 0.307
Power Factor: 1.584 1.605
OPS: 0.685 0.668
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 254
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 234
Actual Runs Scored: 264

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Friday, 5 June 2026, at 5:02 am Pacific Time.