Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Yankees 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Yankees Projected Pitching

Through games of Tuesday, 22 September 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.018)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Brendan Beck, actual: 3 34 29 7 2 0 4 21 5 7 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 1242
Brendan Beck, projected: 3 35 30 7 2 0 4 21 5 7 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 1242
David Bednar, actual: 62 271 247 51 7 2 4 74 18 25 202 0 4 2 3 2 6 481
David Bednar, projected: 62 276 248 53 11 2 6 85 22 27 202 1 2 2 1 3 6 551
Jake Bird, actual: 36 139 121 36 9 0 4 57 11 20 91 0 2 5 1 0 2 1016
Jake Bird, projected: 36 141 124 34 7 1 4 52 13 19 91 0 2 3 1 1 2 941
Paul Blackburn, actual: 60 326 293 57 8 0 7 86 32 18 249 0 0 1 1 1 4 408
Paul Blackburn, projected: 60 332 302 81 16 2 10 130 25 41 249 0 2 3 2 1 7 721
Kervin Castro, actual: 5 23 21 3 1 0 0 4 2 1 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 147
Kervin Castro, projected: 5 23 21 5 1 0 1 8 2 3 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 616
Angel Chivilli, actual: 15 73 65 14 2 0 4 28 7 9 50 0 0 1 1 0 2 853
Angel Chivilli, projected: 15 74 67 19 2 0 4 33 6 12 50 0 0 1 0 0 1 983
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Gerrit Cole, actual: 21 497 471 112 21 2 21 200 22 50 364 0 0 2 0 0 6 646
Gerrit Cole, projected: 21 506 466 105 20 2 14 172 32 48 364 2 2 4 3 0 10 571
Fernando Cruz, actual: 61 234 198 41 11 0 7 73 32 23 164 0 2 2 0 2 3 655
Fernando Cruz, projected: 61 238 206 42 11 1 6 74 29 27 164 0 1 2 0 1 5 635
Yovanny Cruz, actual: 4 20 18 3 1 0 0 4 1 1 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 209
Yovanny Cruz, projected: 4 20 17 4 1 0 1 7 3 3 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 810
Yerry de los Santos, actual: 15 84 74 16 1 0 2 23 8 7 60 2 0 0 1 1 2 538
Yerry de los Santos, projected: 15 86 74 17 3 0 1 24 9 9 60 1 1 1 2 1 2 626
Camilo Doval, actual: 44 178 152 38 6 0 6 62 18 29 119 0 6 2 4 1 13 1014
Camilo Doval, projected: 44 181 155 35 7 0 3 52 21 21 119 1 2 2 1 2 6 677
Max Fried, actual: 20 434 394 79 13 2 4 108 33 35 338 2 3 2 3 0 4 345
Max Fried, projected: 20 442 404 93 16 2 9 138 30 40 338 1 2 4 3 1 4 510
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Michael Fulmer, actual: 11 39 33 7 2 1 2 17 5 6 26 0 0 1 0 0 1 992
Michael Fulmer, projected: 11 40 36 9 2 0 1 14 3 5 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 692
Luis Gil, actual: 8 114 96 21 3 0 6 42 14 15 76 0 0 4 0 0 1 878
Luis Gil, projected: 8 116 99 20 5 0 3 35 15 11 76 0 0 1 0 0 1 628
Bradley Hanner, actual: 4 26 25 9 1 1 4 24 1 7 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 2078
Bradley Hanner, projected: 4 26 25 9 1 1 4 24 1 7 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 2066
Brent Headrick, actual: 79 318 289 66 12 6 5 105 25 19 231 4 0 0 1 1 2 543
Brent Headrick, projected: 79 324 291 67 15 4 10 121 26 28 231 2 1 3 1 1 1 660
Tim Hill, actual: 65 235 213 52 4 0 12 92 13 33 172 1 1 7 2 2 2 692
Tim Hill, projected: 65 239 216 55 7 0 6 82 17 30 172 1 2 4 2 2 1 646
Carlos Rodón, actual: 16 340 294 51 12 0 7 84 38 30 253 2 4 2 2 0 8 460
Carlos Rodón, projected: 16 346 307 69 14 1 10 115 31 37 253 1 2 4 3 0 9 638
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Elmer Rodríguez, actual: 6 125 102 26 4 0 2 36 16 16 80 0 1 5 0 0 1 852
Elmer Rodríguez, projected: 6 127 104 26 4 0 2 37 16 16 80 0 1 5 0 0 1 864
Cam Schlittler, actual: 32 747 684 126 26 3 16 206 47 50 572 4 4 6 4 0 5 403
Cam Schlittler, projected: 32 760 688 133 25 2 17 214 56 54 572 3 4 8 3 0 11 456
Clarke Schmidt, actual: 1 4 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2933
Clarke Schmidt, projected: 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
John Schreiber, actual: 9 37 33 7 1 1 0 10 4 3 29 0 0 0 0 1 0 321
John Schreiber, projected: 9 38 34 8 2 0 1 13 3 4 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 558
Max Schuemann, actual: 1 5 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 801
Max Schuemann, projected: 1 5 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Justin Topa, actual: 2 16 14 4 1 0 0 5 1 1 9 0 0 1 1 0 0 1340
Justin Topa, projected: 2 16 15 4 1 0 0 6 1 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 729
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Will Warren, actual: 31 662 595 156 36 3 21 261 54 83 457 1 6 4 6 1 3 804
Will Warren, projected: 31 674 601 158 36 3 22 265 59 91 457 1 7 4 5 0 5 847
Ryan Weathers, actual: 25 568 523 130 18 2 18 206 38 61 412 1 3 3 2 0 1 629
Ryan Weathers, projected: 25 578 522 136 25 1 22 230 44 73 412 3 3 6 4 1 5 745
Ryan Yarbrough, actual: 37 256 228 50 10 3 3 75 22 33 183 2 0 4 3 1 3 548
Ryan Yarbrough, projected: 37 261 238 59 13 1 8 97 15 31 183 1 1 5 2 1 4 679
Yankees, Actual: 157 5805 5220 1165 212 26 159 1906 468 582 4216 19 36 55 36 13 70 573
Yankees, Projected: 157 5908 5298 1250 247 23 169 2051 485 646 4216 18 35 63 34 15 81 635


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.223 0.236
Slugging Average: 0.365 0.387
Walks (per PA): 0.081 0.082
SOs (per PA): 0.242 0.247
On-Base Average: 0.292 0.306
Power Factor: 1.636 1.641
OPS: 0.657 0.693
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 573
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 635
Actual Runs Scored: 582

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 23 September 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.