Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Yankees 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Yankees Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.004)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Carlos Rodón, actual: 736 667 157 32 4 31 290 57 0 2 10 0 716
Carlos Rodón, projected: 739 656 153 31 2 22 255 65 3 5 9 1 671
Nestor Cortes, actual: 710 661 162 44 0 24 278 39 2 4 4 0 615
Nestor Cortes, projected: 713 655 153 33 0 27 269 49 1 3 4 0 617
Marcus Stroman, actual: 675 603 167 28 4 19 260 60 0 3 8 1 851
Marcus Stroman, projected: 678 620 158 28 2 15 237 48 1 3 4 0 633
Luis Gil, actual: 637 550 104 28 2 18 190 77 0 1 8 1 553
Luis Gil, projected: 639 551 105 24 2 18 187 80 0 1 7 1 565
Gerrit Cole, actual: 390 355 78 14 1 11 127 29 0 0 6 0 563
Gerrit Cole, projected: 392 360 81 16 1 11 132 25 2 2 3 0 538
Clarke Schmidt, actual: 353 309 71 11 2 8 110 30 0 5 9 0 627
Clarke Schmidt, projected: 354 315 80 17 1 10 128 29 1 3 7 0 736
Luke Weaver, actual: 331 296 52 9 4 10 99 26 1 4 4 0 470
Luke Weaver, projected: 332 301 80 18 2 12 137 25 2 2 3 0 808
Michael Tonkin, actual: 232 206 44 11 1 5 72 21 0 2 3 0 565
Michael Tonkin, projected: 233 208 51 9 1 8 86 19 1 2 3 0 749
Dennis Santana, actual: 115 103 27 7 1 2 42 10 1 0 1 0 658
Dennis Santana, projected: 115 100 23 5 1 2 36 12 0 1 2 0 672
Tim Hill, actual: 173 160 36 3 0 2 45 9 1 2 1 0 392
Tim Hill, projected: 174 155 41 6 0 4 59 13 1 1 3 0 687
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Enyel De Los Santos, actual: 37 31 13 6 0 1 22 3 0 0 3 0 2264
Enyel De Los Santos, projected: 37 33 8 2 0 1 15 3 0 0 1 0 644
Clay Holmes, actual: 271 242 60 12 0 4 84 22 1 3 3 0 641
Clay Holmes, projected: 272 236 53 9 0 4 74 29 0 1 6 0 591
Mark Leiter Jr., actual: 104 93 28 8 0 6 54 9 0 0 2 0 1215
Mark Leiter Jr., projected: 104 92 22 4 1 4 39 9 0 1 2 0 800
Caleb Ferguson, actual: 155 136 34 9 0 5 58 16 0 1 2 0 852
Caleb Ferguson, projected: 156 137 33 6 0 4 52 15 0 1 3 0 699
Tommy Kahnle, actual: 179 158 30 9 0 5 54 19 0 0 2 0 539
Tommy Kahnle, projected: 180 156 33 7 0 5 55 20 1 2 1 0 604
Tim Mayza, actual: 74 69 18 3 1 2 29 3 0 1 1 0 722
Tim Mayza, projected: 74 67 17 4 0 2 27 6 0 1 0 0 671
Jake Cousins, actual: 155 130 20 1 1 5 38 20 0 0 5 0 501
Jake Cousins, projected: 156 128 23 3 1 4 40 23 0 0 4 0 577
Ian Hamilton, actual: 163 142 37 10 0 2 53 14 0 4 3 0 743
Ian Hamilton, projected: 164 142 33 7 0 2 48 17 0 2 2 0 591
Cody Poteet, actual: 96 87 18 3 0 2 27 8 0 0 1 0 430
Cody Poteet, projected: 96 86 19 5 0 4 35 10 0 0 0 0 645
Victor González, actual: 97 81 13 2 0 3 24 13 0 0 3 0 509
Victor González, projected: 97 85 18 4 0 2 26 9 0 1 3 0 539
Ron Marinaccio, actual: 99 83 18 4 0 4 34 10 1 2 3 0 791
Ron Marinaccio, projected: 99 82 15 3 0 2 26 12 0 1 3 0 574
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Will Warren, actual: 110 97 33 11 0 5 59 10 0 1 1 1 1373
Will Warren, projected: 110 97 33 11 0 5 59 10 0 1 1 1 1373
Yoendrys Gómez, actual: 54 44 11 3 0 2 20 7 0 2 1 0 1116
Yoendrys Gómez, projected: 54 45 10 3 0 2 18 6 0 2 2 0 965
Nick Burdi, actual: 45 34 5 0 0 1 8 9 0 0 2 0 623
Nick Burdi, projected: 45 37 9 1 1 1 15 7 0 0 1 0 932
Phil Bickford, actual: 39 36 10 2 0 1 15 1 0 0 1 1 941
Phil Bickford, projected: 39 34 8 2 0 1 14 4 0 0 1 0 687
Josh Maciejewski, actual: 27 25 4 1 0 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 387
Josh Maciejewski, projected: 27 25 4 1 0 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 387
Jonathan Loáisiga, actual: 20 19 7 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 1013
Jonathan Loáisiga, projected: 20 18 4 1 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 438
Clayton Beeter, actual: 15 14 4 2 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 640
Clayton Beeter, projected: 15 14 4 2 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 640
Scott Effross, actual: 14 12 3 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 884
Scott Effross, projected: 14 13 3 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 279
Jose Trevino, actual: 13 11 5 3 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 2743
Jose Trevino, projected: 13 11 5 3 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 2743
Anthony Misiewicz, actual: 6 5 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1685
Anthony Misiewicz, projected: 6 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 891
Clayton Andrews, actual: 3 2 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 7094
Clayton Andrews, projected: 3 3 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 669
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Oswaldo Cabrera, actual: 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2345
Oswaldo Cabrera, projected: 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2345
Yankees, Actual: 6131 5462 1272 276 21 181 2133 533 7 37 88 4 670
Yankees, Projected: 6153 5468 1282 265 15 173 2106 555 13 36 75 3 655
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.233 0.234
Slugging Average: 0.391 0.385
Walks (per PA): 0.087 0.090
SOs (per PA): 0.238 0.248
On-Base Average: 0.309 0.312
Power Factor: 1.677 1.643
OPS: 0.700 0.697
TPP Runs (to date): 668 671

Runs differential:
Actual Runs -3 less than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.