Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Yankees 2025 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Yankees Projected Pitching

Through games of Sunday, 6 July 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.017)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Max Fried, actual: 19 471 439 90 12 3 9 135 24 36 357 1 0 7 10 0 6 452
Max Fried, projected: 19 479 439 102 17 1 10 152 32 43 357 1 2 5 4 1 5 529
Carlos Rodón, actual: 19 449 402 75 17 0 15 137 40 45 335 2 1 4 2 0 8 512
Carlos Rodón, projected: 19 457 406 93 19 1 14 156 40 49 335 2 3 5 3 0 11 639
Will Warren, actual: 18 373 327 81 17 3 8 128 39 49 253 0 4 2 1 0 5 779
Will Warren, projected: 18 379 333 90 22 2 10 147 38 60 253 0 4 2 1 0 5 900
Clarke Schmidt, actual: 14 316 282 56 12 2 9 99 30 29 236 1 2 1 0 0 6 520
Clarke Schmidt, projected: 14 321 286 69 15 1 9 113 27 36 236 1 3 5 2 1 4 660
Ryan Yarbrough, actual: 16 226 206 48 5 0 10 83 17 24 166 0 1 2 0 0 7 655
Ryan Yarbrough, projected: 16 230 211 52 11 0 7 86 13 27 166 1 1 4 2 1 3 638
Tim Hill, actual: 42 157 146 30 4 0 5 49 11 13 121 0 0 0 0 1 0 437
Tim Hill, projected: 42 160 143 37 5 0 4 54 12 20 121 1 1 3 1 1 1 617
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Mark Leiter Jr., actual: 41 158 144 42 6 0 3 57 12 22 103 0 0 2 2 0 7 936
Mark Leiter Jr., projected: 41 161 143 35 6 1 6 60 14 22 103 0 1 3 2 1 5 909
Fernando Cruz, actual: 32 131 114 19 5 0 3 33 14 13 99 0 1 2 0 0 2 425
Fernando Cruz, projected: 32 133 116 23 6 1 3 41 15 16 99 0 1 1 0 0 4 587
Devin Williams, actual: 36 138 118 25 6 0 1 34 14 20 97 1 1 4 1 1 7 565
Devin Williams, projected: 36 140 121 20 4 0 2 31 16 11 97 0 1 2 2 1 4 468
Carlos Carrasco, actual: 8 142 131 39 9 0 7 69 10 21 96 0 1 0 0 0 3 998
Carlos Carrasco, projected: 8 144 132 34 8 1 4 56 10 17 96 0 1 1 1 0 2 749
Ian Hamilton, actual: 27 134 111 22 1 1 3 34 19 14 96 2 0 1 0 1 0 512
Ian Hamilton, projected: 27 136 117 27 5 0 2 39 15 13 96 0 1 2 0 0 1 570
Luke Weaver, actual: 31 121 110 19 2 0 6 39 9 12 93 0 1 0 0 1 1 511
Luke Weaver, projected: 31 123 111 29 6 1 4 50 9 16 93 1 1 1 1 0 1 742
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Jonathan Loáisiga, actual: 20 91 83 21 5 0 4 38 6 10 64 0 0 1 0 2 0 738
Jonathan Loáisiga, projected: 20 93 83 20 3 0 2 30 7 10 64 0 1 1 1 0 1 656
Yerry De Los Santos, actual: 14 93 79 22 2 0 0 24 12 4 60 1 1 0 2 0 2 822
Yerry De Los Santos, projected: 14 95 81 19 3 0 1 26 11 10 60 1 1 1 2 1 2 741
Marcus Stroman, actual: 5 89 78 22 7 0 4 41 10 16 58 0 0 1 0 0 1 1044
Marcus Stroman, projected: 5 91 83 21 4 0 2 32 7 10 58 0 0 1 1 0 2 713
Yoendrys Gómez, actual: 6 44 35 5 0 0 1 8 9 4 30 0 0 0 0 0 1 542
Yoendrys Gómez, projected: 6 45 37 10 2 0 2 16 6 6 30 0 1 1 1 0 0 1134
Brent Headrick, actual: 11 54 50 12 3 0 3 24 3 7 40 0 0 1 0 0 0 689
Brent Headrick, projected: 11 55 48 12 3 0 3 26 4 8 40 0 1 1 0 0 0 869
Tyler Matzek, actual: 7 35 29 11 4 0 0 15 5 3 19 0 1 0 0 0 2 1885
Tyler Matzek, projected: 7 36 31 7 2 0 1 11 4 4 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 879
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Allan Winans, actual: 2 30 24 8 0 1 1 13 2 7 19 0 2 2 0 0 0 1412
Allan Winans, projected: 2 31 27 8 2 0 1 15 2 6 19 0 1 1 0 0 0 1134
JT Brubaker, actual: 5 24 19 5 2 0 0 7 4 5 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 861
JT Brubaker, projected: 5 24 19 5 2 0 0 7 4 5 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 875
Scott Effross, actual: 3 12 12 3 1 0 0 4 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 393
Scott Effross, projected: 3 12 11 2 0 0 0 4 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 270
Clayton Beeter, actual: 1 10 7 3 1 0 1 7 2 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 2503
Clayton Beeter, projected: 1 10 9 3 1 0 0 5 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1296
Adam Ottavino, actual: 3 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 1091
Adam Ottavino, projected: 3 9 8 2 0 0 0 3 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 648
Geoff Hartlieb, actual: 1 8 5 2 0 0 0 2 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3062
Geoff Hartlieb, projected: 1 8 7 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1296
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Pablo Reyes, actual: 1 8 8 5 2 0 1 10 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6476
Pablo Reyes, projected: 1 8 7 3 1 0 0 4 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2916
Jayvien Sandridge, actual: 1 6 3 1 0 0 1 4 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 5494
Jayvien Sandridge, projected: 1 6 3 1 0 0 1 4 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 5508
Yankees, Actual: 90 3329 2967 666 123 10 95 1094 301 367 2384 9 16 32 18 6 60 349
Yankees, Projected: 90 3386 3012 726 147 9 88 1171 293 398 2384 8 25 42 24 7 52 381


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.224 0.241
Slugging Average: 0.369 0.389
Walks (per PA): 0.090 0.087
SOs (per PA): 0.243 0.247
On-Base Average: 0.301 0.315
Power Factor: 1.643 1.613
OPS: 0.670 0.703
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 349
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 381
Actual Runs Scored: 367

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2025 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 7 July 2025, at 4:02 am Pacific Time.