Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Pirates 2025 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Pirates Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 23 June 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.017)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Paul Skenes, actual: 16 390 361 63 19 1 5 99 27 24 306 0 0 2 4 0 1 317
Paul Skenes, projected: 16 397 367 69 14 1 7 105 26 24 306 0 0 4 3 0 3 365
Mitch Keller, actual: 16 395 366 91 20 1 6 131 24 46 282 0 1 4 1 0 16 617
Mitch Keller, projected: 16 402 360 97 20 2 10 152 32 50 282 1 3 6 2 0 10 780
Bailey Falter, actual: 16 343 304 70 15 1 9 114 31 39 256 3 4 1 0 0 7 551
Bailey Falter, projected: 16 349 319 83 17 1 13 141 23 45 256 2 3 2 1 0 7 699
Andrew Heaney, actual: 15 342 306 71 22 1 11 128 27 36 247 2 4 3 1 0 5 662
Andrew Heaney, projected: 15 348 316 79 16 1 14 138 24 43 247 1 2 5 2 0 3 756
Carmen Mlodzinski, actual: 12 209 192 60 12 2 7 97 15 29 138 0 0 2 1 0 2 1021
Carmen Mlodzinski, projected: 12 213 189 48 9 1 5 73 19 24 138 0 2 2 1 1 4 770
Caleb Ferguson, actual: 35 134 115 23 3 0 0 26 12 11 100 1 2 4 0 2 6 376
Caleb Ferguson, projected: 35 136 120 28 5 0 3 43 13 15 100 0 1 3 1 1 2 639
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Dennis Santana, actual: 34 124 116 21 3 2 1 31 5 7 100 0 3 0 1 0 2 312
Dennis Santana, projected: 34 126 110 25 5 1 2 38 12 16 100 0 1 2 1 0 2 543
Chase Shugart, actual: 28 134 117 25 6 0 4 43 14 13 98 0 2 1 0 2 1 573
Chase Shugart, projected: 28 136 120 26 6 0 4 44 14 14 98 0 2 1 0 2 1 590
Joey Wentz, actual: 19 115 102 25 5 1 2 38 11 14 78 0 1 1 3 2 8 844
Joey Wentz, projected: 19 117 103 28 5 1 4 47 12 17 78 0 1 1 1 0 4 972
Mike Burrows, actual: 6 123 111 31 4 1 6 55 8 16 84 0 2 2 1 0 3 981
Mike Burrows, projected: 6 125 111 30 4 1 6 55 10 16 84 0 2 2 1 0 3 972
David Bednar, actual: 31 112 102 23 2 2 2 35 8 11 83 0 1 1 0 2 4 536
David Bednar, projected: 31 114 102 23 5 1 3 37 10 12 83 1 1 1 0 1 3 622
Ryan Borucki, actual: 29 105 92 21 8 0 3 38 11 17 77 1 0 1 0 1 1 573
Ryan Borucki, projected: 29 107 95 23 5 1 3 39 9 13 77 1 0 1 1 1 3 676
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Colin Holderman, actual: 14 74 58 20 4 0 3 33 11 15 45 1 2 2 0 0 3 1453
Colin Holderman, projected: 14 75 64 16 3 0 1 23 8 9 45 0 1 1 0 0 2 775
Braxton Ashcraft, actual: 8 59 53 10 3 1 0 15 6 2 44 0 0 0 0 1 1 371
Braxton Ashcraft, projected: 8 60 54 10 3 1 0 15 6 2 44 0 0 0 0 1 1 365
Isaac Mattson, actual: 10 47 44 5 1 0 2 12 3 3 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 294
Isaac Mattson, projected: 10 48 41 6 1 0 1 10 7 5 40 0 0 1 0 0 0 373
Kyle Nicolas, actual: 10 60 50 13 4 0 2 23 9 10 36 0 1 0 1 0 1 1257
Kyle Nicolas, projected: 10 61 51 13 2 0 1 19 8 9 36 0 1 1 0 0 0 891
Justin Lawrence, actual: 11 44 36 5 3 0 0 8 6 1 34 0 0 2 0 1 1 259
Justin Lawrence, projected: 11 45 37 10 2 0 1 15 6 6 34 0 1 1 0 0 1 781
Tim Mayza, actual: 7 40 37 9 4 0 1 16 1 3 28 0 1 1 1 0 0 776
Tim Mayza, projected: 7 41 37 9 2 0 1 15 3 4 28 0 0 0 0 0 1 602
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tom Harrington, actual: 2 39 33 11 1 0 3 21 5 9 24 0 1 0 0 0 1 1539
Tom Harrington, projected: 2 40 34 11 1 0 3 21 5 9 24 0 1 0 0 0 1 1539
Tanner Rainey, actual: 11 37 28 7 1 0 0 8 6 9 23 1 1 1 0 0 0 807
Tanner Rainey, projected: 11 38 31 7 1 0 1 13 6 5 23 0 0 1 0 0 1 810
Hunter Stratton, actual: 3 21 17 10 1 0 1 14 2 7 8 0 1 1 0 0 0 5083
Hunter Stratton, projected: 3 21 19 5 1 0 1 8 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1512
Pirates, Actual: 80 2947 2640 614 141 13 68 985 242 322 2131 9 27 29 14 11 63 302
Pirates, Projected: 80 2999 2680 646 127 12 84 1051 254 341 2131 6 22 35 14 7 52 332


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.233 0.241
Slugging Average: 0.373 0.392
Walks (per PA): 0.082 0.085
SOs (per PA): 0.201 0.228
On-Base Average: 0.301 0.313
Power Factor: 1.604 1.627
OPS: 0.674 0.705
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 302
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 332
Actual Runs Scored: 322

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2025 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 24 June 2025, at 4:01 am Pacific Time.