Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Giants 2025 Projected Batting Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Giants Projected Batting

Through games of Sunday, 6 July 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each player and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date Plate Appearances to his career Plate Appearances, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of Plate Appearances. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career PAs and 250 PAs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of Plate Appearances that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more PAs the man or team will have in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a team with an abysmal .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they send to the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, that team, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a team with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half its batters make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, they would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his PAs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—PAs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the team’s total Plate Appearances; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team PA total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team PAs to actual PAs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s batting, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.999)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TOP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team pitching numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Rafael Devers, actual: 19 85 71 17 5 0 2 28 12 0 1 1 0 843
Rafael Devers, projected: 19 85 76 21 5 0 4 39 8 0 0 1 0 931
Heliot Ramos, actual: 89 387 341 93 17 1 14 154 31 0 4 11 0 857
Heliot Ramos, projected: 89 387 349 91 17 2 14 155 29 0 3 5 0 785
Willy Adames, actual: 90 384 332 75 13 1 11 123 44 0 6 1 1 696
Willy Adames, projected: 90 384 342 84 18 1 15 149 38 0 2 1 0 758
Jung Hoo Lee, actual: 86 362 325 79 18 7 6 129 29 0 4 4 0 723
Jung Hoo Lee, projected: 86 362 327 81 15 5 6 123 27 0 4 3 0 681
Wilmer Flores, actual: 84 333 299 72 8 0 11 113 28 0 1 5 0 659
Wilmer Flores, projected: 84 333 303 78 15 0 12 130 23 0 3 3 0 722
Mike Yastrzemski, actual: 82 320 279 68 13 1 8 107 39 0 1 1 0 788
Mike Yastrzemski, projected: 82 320 281 67 16 3 13 126 33 1 2 3 0 807
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Matt Chapman, actual: 67 282 238 57 12 0 12 105 41 0 0 3 0 889
Matt Chapman, projected: 67 282 246 59 15 1 12 113 30 0 2 3 0 826
Patrick Bailey, actual: 70 230 203 39 11 2 1 57 19 3 4 1 0 376
Patrick Bailey, projected: 70 230 207 47 10 1 4 69 18 1 3 1 0 508
Tyler Fitzgerald, actual: 63 222 198 45 10 1 3 66 15 6 1 2 0 480
Tyler Fitzgerald, projected: 63 222 202 52 12 1 7 88 14 2 1 2 0 732
LaMonte Wade Jr., actual: 50 169 144 24 8 2 1 39 21 2 1 1 0 384
LaMonte Wade Jr., projected: 50 169 143 34 6 1 5 56 21 1 1 2 0 780
Casey Schmitt, actual: 34 112 98 27 4 0 4 43 10 1 0 3 0 893
Casey Schmitt, projected: 34 112 102 24 5 0 3 39 6 1 1 2 0 516
Christian Koss, actual: 41 108 98 26 3 0 2 35 5 3 1 1 0 669
Christian Koss, projected: 41 108 98 26 3 0 2 35 5 3 1 1 0 669
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Luis Matos, actual: 28 90 85 15 5 0 4 32 5 0 0 0 0 402
Luis Matos, projected: 28 90 83 19 4 0 2 29 5 0 0 1 0 508
Dominic Smith, actual: 24 83 71 17 5 0 1 25 8 0 2 2 0 661
Dominic Smith, projected: 24 83 75 18 4 0 2 30 6 0 1 1 0 628
Sam Huff, actual: 20 58 53 11 1 0 2 18 4 0 1 0 0 468
Sam Huff, projected: 20 58 53 13 2 0 3 23 4 0 0 0 0 701
Andrew Knizner, actual: 14 40 38 6 0 0 1 9 1 1 0 0 0 359
Andrew Knizner, projected: 14 40 36 8 1 0 1 11 3 0 0 1 0 426
Brett Wisely, actual: 15 40 35 8 3 0 1 14 3 2 0 0 0 467
Brett Wisely, projected: 15 40 37 8 2 0 1 12 2 0 0 0 0 411
Daniel Johnson, actual: 14 31 29 5 2 0 1 10 2 0 0 0 0 439
Daniel Johnson, projected: 14 31 29 6 0 0 1 10 2 0 0 0 0 423
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
David Villar, actual: 9 25 20 4 1 0 0 5 4 0 0 1 0 511
David Villar, projected: 9 25 22 4 1 0 1 9 2 0 0 1 0 585
Jerar Encarnación, actual: 8 22 22 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 32
Jerar Encarnación, projected: 8 22 21 4 1 0 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 493
Logan Porter, actual: 4 9 7 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 405
Logan Porter, projected: 4 9 7 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 282
Sergio Alcántara, actual: 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sergio Alcántara, projected: 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 338
Giants, Actual: 91 3396 2990 692 140 15 85 1117 322 18 27 38 1 365
Giants, Projected: 91 3396 3043 746 152 15 109 1257 278 9 24 31 0 395


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.231 0.245
Slugging Average: 0.374 0.413
Walks (per PA): 0.095 0.082
SOs (per PA): 0.227 0.228
On-Base Average: 0.312 0.313
Power Factor: 1.614 1.685
OPS: 0.685 0.726
Runs Expected from Actual Stats: 365
Runs Expected from Projected Stats: 395
Actual Runs Scored: 381

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2025 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 7 July 2025, at 4:02 am Pacific Time.