Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Giants 2026 Projected Batting Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Giants Projected Batting

Through games of Monday, 21 September 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each player and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date Plate Appearances to his career Plate Appearances, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of Plate Appearances. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career PAs and 250 PAs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of Plate Appearances that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more PAs the man or team will have in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a team with an abysmal .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they send to the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, that team, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a team with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half its batters make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, they would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his PAs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—PAs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the team’s total Plate Appearances; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team PA total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team PAs to actual PAs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s batting, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.997)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TOP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team pitching numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Willy Adames, actual: 121 505 465 107 25 1 21 197 37 0 1 2 0 705
Willy Adames, projected: 121 503 449 109 23 1 21 197 49 0 3 2 0 762
Luis Arráez, actual: 105 464 420 136 23 7 4 185 25 6 9 4 0 973
Luis Arráez, projected: 105 462 424 134 22 3 5 176 29 2 4 3 0 861
Harrison Bader, actual: 30 111 106 18 5 0 5 38 4 0 1 0 0 402
Harrison Bader, projected: 30 111 100 24 5 0 3 40 8 0 1 2 0 661
Patrick Bailey, actual: 30 89 82 12 0 0 1 15 7 0 0 0 0 205
Patrick Bailey, projected: 30 89 80 18 3 0 2 27 7 1 1 0 0 487
Scott Bandura, actual: 8 20 19 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 216
Scott Bandura, projected: 8 20 19 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 216
Osleivis Basabe, actual: 44 140 127 26 3 0 5 44 8 1 1 3 0 530
Osleivis Basabe, projected: 44 140 128 27 5 0 4 42 8 1 1 2 0 501
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Víctor Bericoto, actual: 36 97 95 24 4 0 5 43 2 0 0 0 0 538
Víctor Bericoto, projected: 36 97 95 24 4 0 5 43 2 0 0 0 0 538
Will Brennan, actual: 11 23 23 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 9
Will Brennan, projected: 11 23 22 6 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 440
Drew Cavanaugh, actual: 55 157 136 31 3 0 1 37 18 3 0 0 0 436
Drew Cavanaugh, projected: 55 156 136 31 3 0 1 37 18 3 0 0 0 426
Matt Chapman, actual: 84 352 307 72 18 1 7 113 37 0 3 5 0 676
Matt Chapman, projected: 84 351 306 73 19 2 14 138 38 0 2 4 0 810
Jonah Cox, actual: 57 148 132 37 3 2 4 56 8 7 0 0 1 703
Jonah Cox, projected: 57 148 132 37 3 2 4 56 8 7 0 0 1 682
Dylan Carlson, actual: 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 565
Dylan Carlson, projected: 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 569
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Rafael Devers, actual: 148 633 558 144 36 1 37 293 69 0 4 2 0 934
Rafael Devers, projected: 148 631 562 154 37 1 31 286 61 0 3 5 0 942
Bryce Eldridge, actual: 107 448 386 104 23 0 17 178 59 0 3 0 0 1006
Bryce Eldridge, projected: 107 446 381 99 23 0 16 168 61 0 4 1 0 954
Jerar Encarnacion, actual: 17 35 34 6 1 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 153
Jerar Encarnacion, projected: 17 35 33 7 1 0 1 12 1 0 0 0 0 363
Nate Furman, actual: 22 39 32 4 0 0 0 4 5 2 0 0 0 122
Nate Furman, projected: 22 39 32 4 0 0 0 4 5 2 0 0 0 103
Drew Gilbert, actual: 129 384 333 79 14 3 11 132 37 2 3 9 0 697
Drew Gilbert, projected: 129 383 336 76 15 3 11 130 34 2 3 8 0 615
Eric Haase, actual: 29 84 74 12 3 0 4 27 6 3 0 1 0 437
Eric Haase, projected: 29 84 77 17 3 0 3 30 5 0 0 0 0 534
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Brett Harris, actual: 10 28 25 6 2 0 0 8 1 1 0 1 0 358
Brett Harris, projected: 10 28 24 5 1 0 0 7 3 0 0 1 0 365
Turner Hill, actual: 30 110 92 22 6 0 1 31 13 0 3 2 0 713
Turner Hill, projected: 30 110 92 22 6 0 1 31 13 0 3 2 0 685
Buddy Kennedy, actual: 20 38 33 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 0 180
Buddy Kennedy, projected: 20 38 33 5 1 0 0 8 4 0 0 1 0 246
Andrew Knizner, actual: 25 70 64 14 3 0 2 23 4 0 0 2 0 482
Andrew Knizner, projected: 25 70 63 13 2 0 1 20 5 0 0 1 0 399
Christian Koss, actual: 65 203 187 43 6 0 4 61 9 5 0 2 0 476
Christian Koss, projected: 65 202 185 46 8 0 4 64 9 4 1 3 0 561
Jung Hoo Lee, actual: 143 579 539 149 31 4 10 218 29 0 4 7 0 756
Jung Hoo Lee, projected: 143 577 530 143 28 7 9 211 37 0 4 6 0 753
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Eddys Leonard, actual: 3 8 8 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 422
Eddys Leonard, projected: 3 8 8 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 421
Marcelo Mayer, actual: 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marcelo Mayer, projected: 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 338
Grant McCray, actual: 40 89 75 11 2 1 2 21 11 3 0 0 0 444
Grant McCray, projected: 40 89 80 14 2 1 3 26 7 1 0 0 0 444
Jared Oliva, actual: 7 7 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jared Oliva, projected: 7 7 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 159
Heliot Ramos, actual: 74 306 288 76 13 3 9 122 16 0 1 1 0 718
Heliot Ramos, projected: 74 305 276 70 12 1 10 115 22 0 2 4 0 698
Jesús Rodríguez, actual: 22 58 51 12 3 0 2 21 5 1 0 1 0 581
Jesús Rodríguez, projected: 22 58 51 12 3 0 2 21 5 1 0 1 0 539
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Casey Schmitt, actual: 98 409 387 105 17 1 21 187 11 0 4 7 0 810
Casey Schmitt, projected: 98 408 376 92 18 1 16 158 20 1 4 6 0 641
Daniel Susac, actual: 53 161 144 35 8 1 3 54 8 2 4 3 0 545
Daniel Susac, projected: 53 160 144 35 8 1 3 54 8 2 4 3 0 532
Shay Whitcomb, actual: 27 84 80 15 3 0 2 24 2 2 0 0 0 319
Shay Whitcomb, projected: 27 84 79 14 3 0 2 23 4 1 0 0 0 297
Giants, Actual: 157 5887 5317 1313 257 25 178 2154 437 38 41 53 1 671
Giants, Projected: 157 5870 5268 1319 261 23 172 2142 473 28 40 55 1 668


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.247 0.250
Slugging Average: 0.405 0.407
Walks (per PA): 0.074 0.081
SOs (per PA): 0.218 0.220
On-Base Average: 0.308 0.316
Power Factor: 1.641 1.624
OPS: 0.713 0.723
Runs Expected from Actual Stats: 671
Runs Expected from Projected Stats: 668
Actual Runs Scored: 661

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 22 September 2026, at 5:32 am Pacific Time.