Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Giants 2025 Projected Batting Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Giants Projected Batting

Through games of Sunday, 28 September 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each player and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date Plate Appearances to his career Plate Appearances, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of Plate Appearances. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career PAs and 250 PAs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of Plate Appearances that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more PAs the man or team will have in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a team with an abysmal .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they send to the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, that team, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a team with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half its batters make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, they would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his PAs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—PAs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the team’s total Plate Appearances; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team PA total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team PAs to actual PAs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s batting, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.994)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TOP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team pitching numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Willy Adames, actual: 160 686 591 133 22 2 30 249 80 0 9 5 1 785
Willy Adames, projected: 160 682 606 148 31 1 29 267 68 1 4 3 0 772
Sergio Alcántara, actual: 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sergio Alcántara, projected: 1 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 338
Patrick Bailey, actual: 135 452 409 91 18 3 6 133 30 4 6 3 0 472
Patrick Bailey, projected: 135 449 407 94 19 2 8 138 32 3 5 2 0 508
Matt Chapman, actual: 128 535 454 105 23 2 21 195 71 0 4 6 0 837
Matt Chapman, projected: 128 532 465 112 28 3 23 213 58 0 3 6 0 834
Rafael Devers, actual: 90 395 335 79 15 0 20 154 56 0 2 2 0 857
Rafael Devers, projected: 90 393 350 97 23 1 19 177 37 0 2 3 0 952
Bryce Eldridge, actual: 10 37 28 3 2 0 0 5 7 0 1 1 0 403
Bryce Eldridge, projected: 10 37 28 3 2 0 0 5 7 0 1 1 0 402
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Jerar Encarnación, actual: 19 56 55 11 3 0 2 20 1 0 0 0 0 341
Jerar Encarnación, projected: 19 56 53 12 2 0 2 20 2 0 0 0 0 431
Tyler Fitzgerald, actual: 72 243 217 47 10 1 4 71 17 6 1 2 0 462
Tyler Fitzgerald, projected: 72 242 220 56 12 1 8 95 16 2 1 2 0 722
Wilmer Flores, actual: 125 463 419 101 10 0 16 159 34 0 3 7 0 651
Wilmer Flores, projected: 125 460 419 108 21 0 17 180 32 0 4 5 0 731
Drew Gilbert, actual: 39 109 100 19 5 1 3 35 7 0 1 1 0 447
Drew Gilbert, projected: 39 108 99 19 5 1 3 35 7 0 1 1 0 450
Sam Huff, actual: 20 58 53 11 1 0 2 18 4 0 1 0 0 468
Sam Huff, projected: 20 58 53 13 2 0 3 23 4 0 0 0 0 718
Daniel Johnson, actual: 14 31 29 5 2 0 1 10 2 0 0 0 0 439
Daniel Johnson, projected: 14 31 29 6 1 0 1 9 2 0 0 0 0 462
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Andrew Knizner, actual: 33 88 77 17 1 1 1 23 7 1 1 2 0 772
Andrew Knizner, projected: 33 88 79 17 3 0 2 25 6 0 0 2 0 455
Christian Koss, actual: 74 191 174 46 9 0 3 64 9 3 2 3 0 668
Christian Koss, projected: 74 190 173 46 9 0 3 64 9 3 2 3 0 661
Jung Hoo Lee, actual: 150 617 560 149 31 12 8 228 47 0 4 6 0 819
Jung Hoo Lee, projected: 150 613 558 148 28 9 8 218 45 0 5 6 0 761
Luis Matos, actual: 57 184 172 38 9 1 8 73 11 0 1 0 0 591
Luis Matos, projected: 57 183 170 39 8 1 5 63 11 1 1 1 0 576
Grant McCray, actual: 22 26 22 2 0 1 0 4 2 1 1 0 0 112
Grant McCray, projected: 22 26 24 4 0 0 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 367
Logan Porter, actual: 4 9 7 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 405
Logan Porter, projected: 4 9 7 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 282
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Heliot Ramos, actual: 157 695 620 159 24 1 21 248 52 0 6 17 0 714
Heliot Ramos, projected: 157 691 625 160 27 2 23 261 51 0 5 10 0 725
Casey Schmitt, actual: 95 348 312 74 15 0 12 125 27 1 3 5 0 666
Casey Schmitt, projected: 95 346 315 72 16 0 11 121 21 2 3 5 0 548
Dominic Smith, actual: 63 225 204 58 12 0 5 85 15 0 4 2 0 772
Dominic Smith, projected: 63 224 202 50 12 0 6 82 17 0 2 3 0 657
David Villar, actual: 9 25 20 4 1 0 0 5 4 0 0 1 0 511
David Villar, projected: 9 25 22 4 1 0 1 9 2 0 0 1 0 585
LaMonte Wade Jr., actual: 50 169 144 24 8 2 1 39 21 2 1 1 0 384
LaMonte Wade Jr., projected: 50 168 142 34 6 1 5 56 21 1 1 2 0 791
Brett Wisely, actual: 22 54 48 10 4 0 1 17 4 2 0 0 0 413
Brett Wisely, projected: 22 54 49 10 3 0 1 16 3 1 0 0 0 399
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Mike Yastrzemski, actual: 96 372 321 74 14 1 8 114 47 2 1 1 0 702
Mike Yastrzemski, projected: 96 370 324 77 19 3 14 145 39 1 2 4 0 786
Giants, Actual: 162 6072 5375 1261 239 28 173 2075 556 22 52 66 1 678
Giants, Projected: 162 6039 5423 1331 278 25 193 2233 492 15 42 60 0 700


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.235 0.245
Slugging Average: 0.386 0.412
Walks (per PA): 0.092 0.081
SOs (per PA): 0.227 0.227
On-Base Average: 0.311 0.313
Power Factor: 1.646 1.678
OPS: 0.697 0.725
Runs Expected from Actual Stats: 678
Runs Expected from Projected Stats: 700
Actual Runs Scored: 705

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 29 September 2025, at 12:00 pm Pacific Time.