Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Giants 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Giants Projected Pitching

Through games of Saturday, 18 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.995)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tristan Beck, actual: 8 47 43 13 2 1 1 20 2 8 32 1 1 0 0 0 0 873
Tristan Beck, projected: 8 47 43 10 2 0 1 17 3 5 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 547
Spencer Bivens, actual: 2 10 9 3 0 0 0 3 1 2 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 1314
Spencer Bivens, projected: 2 10 9 2 0 0 0 4 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Ryan Borucki, actual: 21 104 92 27 8 0 3 44 9 14 71 0 1 2 1 1 5 927
Ryan Borucki, projected: 21 103 92 23 5 0 3 38 9 13 71 1 1 1 1 1 3 733
JT Brubaker, actual: 30 187 163 33 7 1 4 54 20 17 141 0 4 0 1 0 4 512
JT Brubaker, projected: 30 186 166 42 9 1 6 71 15 24 141 1 1 2 2 0 2 707
José Buttó, actual: 3 16 12 6 1 0 2 13 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 5041
José Buttó, projected: 3 16 14 3 1 0 0 5 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 918
Jason Foley, actual: 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jason Foley, projected: 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Matt Gage, actual: 34 126 105 28 5 1 6 53 17 18 82 1 2 1 2 0 3 1118
Matt Gage, projected: 34 125 107 28 5 0 3 42 14 13 82 1 1 1 1 1 1 767
Sam Hentges, actual: 24 86 67 14 2 0 0 16 16 5 56 0 1 2 0 1 2 644
Sam Hentges, projected: 24 86 76 19 4 0 2 28 8 10 56 0 0 0 1 0 2 736
Adrian Houser, actual: 18 354 317 85 21 2 13 149 27 49 240 2 4 4 5 0 4 912
Adrian Houser, projected: 18 352 314 81 16 2 9 126 31 43 240 1 2 4 3 0 7 765
Buddy Kennedy, actual: 1 9 6 4 2 0 0 6 2 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7425
Buddy Kennedy, projected: 1 9 6 4 2 0 0 6 2 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7452
Caleb Kilian, actual: 39 171 150 35 2 0 5 52 18 22 117 0 1 1 2 2 4 725
Caleb Kilian, projected: 39 170 144 39 6 0 4 56 21 29 117 1 1 3 1 2 4 852
Christian Koss, actual: 2 10 10 5 2 0 0 7 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1775
Christian Koss, projected: 2 10 10 3 1 0 0 4 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 729
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tyler Mahle, actual: 15 337 299 82 14 2 12 136 32 47 234 2 4 0 0 0 1 811
Tyler Mahle, projected: 15 335 299 74 13 2 11 124 29 39 234 2 2 3 2 1 2 724
Trevor McDonald, actual: 13 291 256 65 11 1 6 96 21 40 199 1 2 10 2 0 8 754
Trevor McDonald, projected: 13 289 258 63 10 1 6 91 19 37 199 2 2 8 2 0 6 685
Erik Miller, actual: 33 124 102 21 4 0 2 31 20 10 85 0 1 1 0 1 8 674
Erik Miller, projected: 33 123 103 22 4 0 2 33 18 11 85 0 1 1 0 1 4 614
Joel Peguero, actual: 11 48 42 10 3 0 0 13 4 5 34 0 0 2 1 0 0 540
Joel Peguero, projected: 11 48 42 9 2 0 1 13 4 4 34 0 0 1 0 0 1 457
Wilkin Ramos, actual: 2 15 11 5 1 0 0 6 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3223
Wilkin Ramos, projected: 2 15 11 5 1 0 0 6 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3240
Robbie Ray, actual: 19 443 383 83 15 1 15 145 52 46 320 2 6 0 3 0 16 667
Robbie Ray, projected: 19 441 388 90 18 2 16 159 44 49 320 2 2 3 3 1 10 699
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Landen Roupp, actual: 19 435 384 87 23 2 7 135 45 50 312 1 2 3 3 0 5 580
Landen Roupp, projected: 19 433 382 93 23 1 8 140 45 48 312 1 2 3 3 0 5 648
Reiver Sanmartín, actual: 2 15 14 4 0 0 3 13 1 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 1710
Reiver Sanmartín, projected: 2 15 13 4 1 0 0 6 2 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 729
Gregory Santos, actual: 3 22 19 5 2 1 0 9 3 5 15 0 0 0 1 0 2 1052
Gregory Santos, projected: 3 22 20 5 1 0 0 7 2 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 594
Carson Seymour, actual: 2 25 23 11 2 0 1 16 2 7 13 0 0 0 0 0 2 2564
Carson Seymour, projected: 2 25 23 7 1 0 1 12 2 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 1215
Dylan Smith, actual: 15 59 49 10 2 0 2 18 6 6 40 1 1 2 1 0 1 772
Dylan Smith, projected: 15 59 49 9 2 0 1 14 6 4 40 1 1 3 1 0 1 529
Blade Tidwell, actual: 8 47 43 10 1 0 1 14 3 4 36 0 0 1 0 0 3 481
Blade Tidwell, projected: 8 47 41 12 1 0 2 19 5 7 36 0 0 1 0 0 2 871
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Ryan Walker, actual: 27 125 107 33 2 2 4 51 15 23 79 2 0 1 1 3 1 1071
Ryan Walker, projected: 27 124 111 26 5 1 3 40 10 13 79 1 1 3 1 1 2 738
Logan Webb, actual: 17 438 403 92 13 3 9 138 27 49 321 1 0 6 5 0 13 559
Logan Webb, projected: 17 436 403 101 20 2 8 148 25 44 321 1 1 4 3 0 9 562
Carson Whisenhunt, actual: 2 46 40 9 1 0 1 13 6 4 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 598
Carson Whisenhunt, projected: 2 46 40 10 2 0 2 18 6 6 32 0 0 1 0 0 1 891
Keaton Winn, actual: 32 127 114 22 6 0 2 34 10 12 97 1 0 2 1 1 1 381
Keaton Winn, projected: 32 126 113 27 6 2 4 48 9 18 97 0 1 2 0 0 3 653
Giants, Actual: 98 3720 3266 802 152 17 99 1285 367 463 2596 15 31 38 30 9 84 443
Giants, Projected: 98 3701 3280 812 161 14 93 1276 336 439 2596 15 20 44 24 8 67 422


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.246 0.248
Slugging Average: 0.393 0.389
Walks (per PA): 0.099 0.091
SOs (per PA): 0.200 0.221
On-Base Average: 0.326 0.324
Power Factor: 1.602 1.571
OPS: 0.719 0.713
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 443
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 422
Actual Runs Scored: 463

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Sunday, 19 July 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.