Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Giants 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Giants Projected Pitching

Through games of Wednesday, 1 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.993)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tristan Beck, actual: 8 47 43 13 2 1 1 20 2 8 32 1 1 0 0 0 0 873
Tristan Beck, projected: 8 47 43 10 2 0 1 17 3 5 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 547
Ryan Borucki, actual: 21 104 92 27 8 0 3 44 9 14 71 0 1 2 1 1 5 927
Ryan Borucki, projected: 21 103 92 23 5 0 3 38 9 13 71 1 1 1 1 1 3 733
JT Brubaker, actual: 27 171 149 31 7 0 3 47 19 15 128 0 3 0 1 0 4 498
JT Brubaker, projected: 27 170 152 39 9 1 5 65 14 22 128 1 1 2 2 0 1 720
José Buttó, actual: 3 16 12 6 1 0 2 13 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 5041
José Buttó, projected: 3 16 14 3 1 0 0 5 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 918
Matt Gage, actual: 33 116 97 24 4 1 5 45 15 12 78 1 2 1 2 0 3 973
Matt Gage, projected: 33 115 99 25 5 0 2 37 13 10 78 1 1 1 1 1 1 682
Sam Hentges, actual: 20 73 55 12 2 0 0 14 15 5 45 0 1 2 0 1 2 804
Sam Hentges, projected: 20 72 65 16 3 0 1 24 7 8 45 0 0 0 1 0 1 713
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Adrian Houser, actual: 16 333 298 84 21 2 13 148 26 49 221 2 3 4 5 0 4 1009
Adrian Houser, projected: 16 331 294 76 15 2 8 119 29 40 221 1 2 4 3 0 6 770
Buddy Kennedy, actual: 1 9 6 4 2 0 0 6 2 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7425
Buddy Kennedy, projected: 1 9 6 4 2 0 0 6 2 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7452
Caleb Kilian, actual: 35 153 133 28 2 0 5 45 17 18 108 0 1 1 1 2 4 643
Caleb Kilian, projected: 35 152 127 33 6 0 4 50 19 26 108 1 1 3 1 2 4 819
Christian Koss, actual: 2 10 10 5 2 0 0 7 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1775
Christian Koss, projected: 2 10 10 3 1 0 0 4 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 729
Tyler Mahle, actual: 13 287 253 69 11 1 12 118 29 42 200 2 3 0 0 0 1 821
Tyler Mahle, projected: 13 285 254 63 11 1 10 105 24 33 200 2 2 3 2 1 2 723
Trevor McDonald, actual: 11 248 216 51 10 1 4 75 19 31 171 1 2 9 2 0 8 696
Trevor McDonald, projected: 11 246 218 50 9 1 4 71 17 29 171 2 2 7 2 0 6 619
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Erik Miller, actual: 28 105 84 19 4 0 2 29 20 10 67 0 0 1 0 1 6 870
Erik Miller, projected: 28 104 87 19 4 0 2 29 16 10 67 0 1 1 0 1 3 712
Joel Peguero, actual: 11 48 42 10 3 0 0 13 4 5 34 0 0 2 1 0 0 540
Joel Peguero, projected: 11 48 42 9 2 0 1 13 4 4 34 0 0 1 0 0 1 457
Wilkin Ramos, actual: 2 15 11 5 1 0 0 6 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3223
Wilkin Ramos, projected: 2 15 11 5 1 0 0 6 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3240
Robbie Ray, actual: 17 396 345 74 13 1 14 131 43 42 287 2 6 0 3 0 16 669
Robbie Ray, projected: 17 393 347 80 16 2 14 142 39 43 287 2 2 3 3 1 9 686
Landen Roupp, actual: 17 381 335 82 23 2 6 127 40 49 267 1 2 3 2 0 5 663
Landen Roupp, projected: 17 378 334 84 21 1 7 126 39 44 267 1 2 2 2 0 5 696
Reiver Sanmartín, actual: 2 15 14 4 0 0 3 13 1 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 1710
Reiver Sanmartín, projected: 2 15 13 4 1 0 0 6 2 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 729
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Gregory Santos, actual: 3 22 19 5 2 1 0 9 3 5 15 0 0 0 1 0 2 1052
Gregory Santos, projected: 3 22 20 5 1 0 0 7 2 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 594
Carson Seymour, actual: 2 25 23 11 2 0 1 16 2 7 13 0 0 0 0 0 2 2564
Carson Seymour, projected: 2 25 22 7 1 0 1 12 2 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 1215
Dylan Smith, actual: 11 43 38 8 1 0 1 12 4 2 29 0 0 1 1 0 1 708
Dylan Smith, projected: 11 43 37 7 1 0 0 9 4 2 29 0 0 2 0 0 0 353
Blade Tidwell, actual: 8 47 43 10 1 0 1 14 3 4 36 0 0 1 0 0 3 481
Blade Tidwell, projected: 8 47 41 12 1 0 2 19 5 7 36 0 0 1 0 0 2 871
Ryan Walker, actual: 24 102 87 26 2 1 2 36 12 18 65 2 0 1 1 3 1 922
Ryan Walker, projected: 24 101 90 21 4 0 2 32 8 10 65 1 1 2 1 1 2 668
Logan Webb, actual: 14 361 333 74 13 2 5 106 22 34 271 1 0 4 2 0 10 461
Logan Webb, projected: 14 358 332 83 16 2 6 121 21 36 271 1 1 3 2 0 7 544
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Carson Whisenhunt, actual: 1 23 21 6 0 0 0 6 2 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 668
Carson Whisenhunt, projected: 1 23 20 5 1 0 1 9 3 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Keaton Winn, actual: 29 119 108 21 6 0 2 33 9 12 92 1 0 1 1 1 1 370
Keaton Winn, projected: 29 118 106 26 6 1 4 46 8 17 92 0 1 2 0 0 3 631
Giants, Actual: 86 3269 2867 709 143 13 85 1133 326 404 2276 14 26 33 24 9 79 391
Giants, Projected: 86 3246 2876 712 145 11 78 1118 296 383 2276 14 19 38 21 8 58 368


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.247 0.248
Slugging Average: 0.395 0.389
Walks (per PA): 0.100 0.091
SOs (per PA): 0.203 0.222
On-Base Average: 0.328 0.324
Power Factor: 1.598 1.570
OPS: 0.724 0.713
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 391
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 368
Actual Runs Scored: 404

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Thursday, 2 July 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.