Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Giants 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Giants Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 10 August 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.994)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Tristan Beck, actual: 11 64 56 17 2 1 2 27 5 11 42 1 1 1 0 0 0 1003
Tristan Beck, projected: 11 64 58 14 3 0 2 23 4 7 42 0 0 1 0 0 0 677
Spencer Bivens, actual: 2 10 9 3 0 0 0 3 1 2 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 1314
Spencer Bivens, projected: 2 10 9 2 0 0 0 4 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Ryan Borucki, actual: 21 104 92 27 8 0 3 44 9 14 71 0 1 2 1 1 5 927
Ryan Borucki, projected: 21 103 92 23 5 0 3 38 9 13 71 1 1 1 1 1 3 733
JT Brubaker, actual: 36 227 199 44 7 2 5 70 23 23 167 0 4 1 1 0 4 580
JT Brubaker, projected: 36 226 202 51 11 1 7 86 19 29 167 1 1 3 3 0 2 720
José Buttó, actual: 3 16 12 6 1 0 2 13 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 5041
José Buttó, projected: 3 16 14 3 1 0 0 5 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 918
Jason Foley, actual: 8 36 32 8 2 1 1 15 4 6 24 0 0 0 0 1 0 861
Jason Foley, projected: 8 36 33 8 1 0 0 12 2 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 466
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Matt Gage, actual: 34 126 105 28 5 1 6 53 17 18 82 1 2 1 2 0 3 1118
Matt Gage, projected: 34 125 107 28 5 0 3 42 14 13 82 1 1 1 1 1 1 767
Trent Harris, actual: 1 4 4 3 2 0 0 5 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13578
Trent Harris, projected: 1 4 4 3 2 0 0 5 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13608
Sam Hentges, actual: 34 126 102 24 3 0 0 27 20 10 83 0 1 3 0 1 2 645
Sam Hentges, projected: 34 125 112 28 5 0 2 41 12 14 83 0 1 1 1 0 2 686
Adrian Houser, actual: 23 424 382 102 23 2 15 174 31 54 291 2 5 4 5 0 7 866
Adrian Houser, projected: 23 422 376 97 18 2 10 151 37 51 291 1 3 4 4 0 8 740
Buddy Kennedy, actual: 1 9 6 4 2 0 0 6 2 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7425
Buddy Kennedy, projected: 1 9 6 4 2 0 0 6 2 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7452
Caleb Kilian, actual: 45 193 168 39 2 0 5 56 20 23 133 2 1 1 2 2 4 669
Caleb Kilian, projected: 45 192 161 43 6 1 4 64 23 34 133 2 1 3 1 2 4 814
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Christian Koss, actual: 2 10 10 5 2 0 0 7 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1775
Christian Koss, projected: 2 10 10 3 1 0 0 4 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 729
Tyler Mahle, actual: 18 404 358 95 15 2 14 156 37 55 284 3 4 2 0 0 1 751
Tyler Mahle, projected: 18 402 359 88 16 2 13 147 34 46 284 2 2 4 2 1 2 693
Trevor McDonald, actual: 14 310 271 69 12 1 7 104 23 43 211 1 2 12 2 0 8 776
Trevor McDonald, projected: 14 308 273 67 11 1 6 98 21 40 211 2 2 10 2 0 6 694
Erik Miller, actual: 38 142 116 23 5 0 2 34 22 10 98 1 1 2 0 2 9 619
Erik Miller, projected: 38 141 118 25 5 0 2 37 20 12 98 1 1 2 0 1 4 580
Joel Peguero, actual: 11 48 42 10 3 0 0 13 4 5 34 0 0 2 1 0 0 540
Joel Peguero, projected: 11 48 42 9 2 0 1 13 4 4 34 0 0 1 0 0 1 457
Wilkin Ramos, actual: 2 15 11 5 1 0 0 6 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3223
Wilkin Ramos, projected: 2 15 11 5 1 0 0 6 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3240
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Robbie Ray, actual: 22 512 446 101 17 1 15 165 57 50 368 2 6 1 4 0 17 660
Robbie Ray, projected: 22 509 448 104 21 2 18 184 51 56 368 2 3 4 4 1 11 700
Landen Roupp, actual: 23 522 457 103 24 2 9 158 57 62 371 2 2 4 4 0 9 600
Landen Roupp, projected: 23 519 457 111 26 1 9 166 55 59 371 2 3 3 4 0 8 655
Reiver Sanmartín, actual: 5 28 26 11 2 1 3 24 2 7 16 0 0 0 0 1 1 2314
Reiver Sanmartín, projected: 5 28 25 7 1 0 1 12 3 4 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Gregory Santos, actual: 3 22 19 5 2 1 0 9 3 5 15 0 0 0 1 0 2 1052
Gregory Santos, projected: 3 22 20 5 1 0 0 7 2 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 594
Carson Seymour, actual: 4 44 38 14 2 0 2 22 6 9 27 0 0 0 0 0 2 1436
Carson Seymour, projected: 4 44 39 11 2 0 2 20 4 7 27 0 0 0 0 0 1 1053
Dylan Smith, actual: 26 102 85 18 5 0 2 29 12 9 70 2 1 2 1 3 2 626
Dylan Smith, projected: 26 101 84 16 4 0 1 24 11 7 70 1 1 3 1 2 1 455
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Blade Tidwell, actual: 10 91 84 20 3 0 1 26 5 7 68 0 1 1 0 0 4 486
Blade Tidwell, projected: 10 90 80 23 3 0 3 34 8 12 68 0 1 1 1 0 3 842
Ryan Walker, actual: 27 125 107 33 2 2 4 51 15 23 79 2 0 1 1 3 1 1071
Ryan Walker, projected: 27 124 110 26 5 1 3 40 10 13 79 1 1 3 1 1 2 738
Logan Webb, actual: 21 538 497 112 14 6 9 165 32 56 399 1 1 6 6 0 16 524
Logan Webb, projected: 21 535 495 124 24 3 9 180 31 54 399 1 2 5 4 0 11 555
Carson Whisenhunt, actual: 5 105 89 26 5 1 4 45 15 18 67 0 1 0 0 0 0 1110
Carson Whisenhunt, projected: 5 104 89 24 5 1 5 45 14 16 67 0 1 1 0 0 1 1069
Keaton Winn, actual: 42 166 146 31 7 0 2 44 16 14 122 1 0 3 1 1 3 459
Keaton Winn, projected: 42 165 147 36 7 2 5 62 12 23 122 1 1 3 1 0 4 671
Giants, Actual: 119 4523 3969 986 178 24 113 1551 446 554 3150 21 35 49 33 15 100 535
Giants, Projected: 119 4497 3981 988 194 17 109 1556 409 537 3150 19 27 54 31 10 77 512


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.248 0.248
Slugging Average: 0.391 0.391
Walks (per PA): 0.099 0.091
SOs (per PA): 0.199 0.219
On-Base Average: 0.329 0.325
Power Factor: 1.573 1.575
OPS: 0.720 0.715
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 535
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 512
Actual Runs Scored: 554

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 11 August 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.