Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Giants 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Giants Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Logan Webb, actual: 841 783 202 35 4 11 278 50 1 5 2 0 565
Logan Webb, projected: 841 779 195 37 4 14 283 49 2 3 7 1 558
Kyle Harrison, actual: 532 476 125 25 1 18 206 42 1 6 7 0 794
Kyle Harrison, projected: 532 475 121 23 2 20 208 42 1 5 9 0 789
Jordan Hicks, actual: 481 423 112 23 2 12 175 47 0 2 9 0 805
Jordan Hicks, projected: 481 412 93 16 2 8 137 57 0 3 9 0 631
Blake Snell, actual: 418 373 65 13 1 6 98 44 0 0 1 0 390
Blake Snell, projected: 418 368 77 16 1 10 125 46 1 1 1 0 555
Sean Hjelle, actual: 337 314 84 9 1 10 125 14 3 1 5 0 644
Sean Hjelle, projected: 337 308 88 10 1 9 128 20 2 1 6 0 774
Ryan Walker, actual: 308 279 50 7 1 5 74 18 1 1 9 0 350
Ryan Walker, projected: 308 276 60 11 1 7 93 23 2 2 6 0 526
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Hayden Birdsong, actual: 315 264 57 11 1 11 103 43 2 2 4 0 727
Hayden Birdsong, projected: 315 264 57 11 1 11 103 43 2 2 4 0 727
Tyler Rogers, actual: 290 273 67 14 0 7 102 6 1 2 7 1 596
Tyler Rogers, projected: 290 267 65 13 1 5 94 14 1 2 5 1 567
Erik Miller, actual: 284 244 50 9 2 7 84 38 0 1 1 0 609
Erik Miller, projected: 284 244 50 9 2 7 84 38 0 1 1 0 609
Taylor Rogers, actual: 249 224 53 13 1 7 89 22 0 1 2 0 638
Taylor Rogers, projected: 249 225 53 11 1 6 84 17 1 2 4 0 588
Camilo Doval, actual: 271 224 54 15 2 5 88 39 2 4 2 0 880
Camilo Doval, projected: 271 233 51 11 1 5 77 30 1 3 4 0 618
Mike Baumann, actual: 5 5 3 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6317
Mike Baumann, projected: 5 4 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 755
Keaton Winn, actual: 238 209 56 10 5 9 103 20 0 4 4 1 929
Keaton Winn, projected: 238 212 53 10 4 9 97 16 1 3 5 1 790
Luke Jackson, actual: 151 133 35 6 0 5 56 15 1 1 1 0 771
Luke Jackson, projected: 151 133 34 6 0 4 53 15 0 1 1 0 765
Randy Rodríguez, actual: 221 196 47 10 2 4 73 18 1 2 3 1 632
Randy Rodríguez, projected: 221 196 47 10 2 4 73 18 1 2 3 1 632
Landen Roupp, actual: 217 190 43 13 0 2 62 26 0 0 1 0 555
Landen Roupp, projected: 217 190 43 13 0 2 62 26 0 0 1 0 555
Spencer Bivens, actual: 202 188 47 7 0 9 81 11 1 1 1 0 694
Spencer Bivens, projected: 202 188 47 7 0 9 81 11 1 1 1 0 694
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Mason Black, actual: 169 149 46 10 0 7 77 15 1 1 3 0 1087
Mason Black, projected: 169 149 46 10 0 7 77 15 1 1 3 0 1087
Robbie Ray, actual: 129 106 20 3 0 6 41 15 0 1 6 1 745
Robbie Ray, projected: 129 114 27 5 1 5 47 13 1 1 1 0 740
Spencer Howard, actual: 114 101 33 7 2 2 50 11 1 1 0 0 1143
Spencer Howard, projected: 114 100 30 5 1 5 53 12 0 1 1 0 1191
Mitch White, actual: 29 24 8 1 1 1 14 5 0 0 0 0 1664
Mitch White, projected: 29 26 7 2 0 1 11 3 0 0 0 0 825
Tristan Beck, actual: 67 61 14 4 0 2 24 4 0 1 1 0 664
Tristan Beck, projected: 67 62 15 3 0 2 24 4 0 0 0 0 606
Daulton Jefferies, actual: 31 29 14 6 1 2 28 2 0 0 0 0 3634
Daulton Jefferies, projected: 31 29 8 3 0 1 15 2 0 0 0 0 864
Nick Avila, actual: 55 50 17 7 1 2 32 3 0 2 0 0 1411
Nick Avila, projected: 55 50 17 7 1 2 32 3 0 2 0 0 1411
Kai-Wei Teng, actual: 55 46 15 2 0 2 23 8 0 0 1 0 1279
Kai-Wei Teng, projected: 55 46 15 2 0 2 23 8 0 0 1 0 1279
Austin Warren, actual: 42 37 9 1 0 1 13 5 0 0 0 0 514
Austin Warren, projected: 42 38 10 2 0 1 15 3 0 0 0 0 644
Tyler Fitzgerald, actual: 14 14 6 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1201
Tyler Fitzgerald, projected: 14 14 6 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1201
Trevor McDonald, actual: 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Trevor McDonald, projected: 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Raymond Burgos, actual: 7 6 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2773
Raymond Burgos, projected: 7 6 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2773
Donovan Walton, actual: 5 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1099
Donovan Walton, projected: 5 5 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1099
Mike Yastrzemski, actual: 8 5 2 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2885
Mike Yastrzemski, projected: 8 5 2 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2885
Giants, Actual: 6095 5440 1339 262 29 153 2118 526 16 39 70 4 690
Giants, Projected: 6095 5427 1323 254 26 156 2096 534 18 37 73 4 674
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.246 0.244
Slugging Average: 0.389 0.386
Walks (per PA): 0.086 0.088
SOs (per PA): 0.236 0.239
On-Base Average: 0.319 0.318
Power Factor: 1.582 1.584
OPS: 0.708 0.704
TPP Runs (to date): 699 676

Runs differential:
Actual Runs 23 greater than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.