Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Rays 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Rays Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.002)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Zach Eflin, actual: 460 440 115 25 2 14 186 13 1 3 3 0 660
Zach Eflin, projected: 461 430 112 24 2 16 187 23 2 3 3 0 699
Aaron Civale, actual: 378 345 93 16 0 16 157 27 1 1 4 0 817
Aaron Civale, projected: 379 347 85 18 1 13 146 24 1 3 4 0 654
Zack Littell, actual: 656 618 164 29 2 22 263 31 1 0 5 1 677
Zack Littell, projected: 658 607 158 33 3 23 267 39 2 3 6 0 711
Taj Bradley, actual: 578 519 122 22 1 22 212 47 3 5 3 1 668
Taj Bradley, projected: 579 522 127 26 2 25 233 48 2 5 2 1 751
Ryan Pepiot, actual: 539 481 102 18 2 17 175 48 0 2 7 1 589
Ryan Pepiot, projected: 540 480 98 18 1 19 175 50 0 1 8 1 573
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Tyler Alexander, actual: 455 419 110 20 1 23 201 24 2 5 5 0 810
Tyler Alexander, projected: 456 423 114 21 2 20 198 24 1 4 4 0 793
Shane Baz, actual: 319 285 57 7 0 9 91 27 0 3 4 0 496
Shane Baz, projected: 320 289 59 8 1 11 102 26 0 2 3 0 536
Jason Adam, actual: 180 159 26 4 1 4 44 16 0 2 3 0 427
Jason Adam, projected: 180 157 28 6 1 5 51 17 0 2 5 0 517
Kevin Kelly, actual: 278 261 59 8 2 7 92 9 2 1 5 0 475
Kevin Kelly, projected: 279 258 56 13 1 5 85 12 1 1 8 0 487
Shawn Armstrong, actual: 214 192 56 12 1 5 85 19 0 1 2 0 924
Shawn Armstrong, projected: 215 192 48 11 1 6 78 17 1 2 3 0 733
Phil Maton, actual: 152 129 29 5 2 6 56 18 0 0 5 0 762
Phil Maton, projected: 152 134 32 7 1 4 54 14 1 1 4 0 694
Garrett Cleavinger, actual: 266 225 52 3 2 6 77 31 0 3 7 0 775
Garrett Cleavinger, projected: 267 227 51 5 2 8 84 30 1 3 5 0 742
Pete Fairbanks, actual: 185 166 36 4 0 4 52 17 1 1 0 0 501
Pete Fairbanks, projected: 185 164 35 5 0 4 51 18 0 1 2 0 574
Edwin Uceta, actual: 159 149 26 6 0 2 38 8 1 0 1 0 278
Edwin Uceta, projected: 159 141 28 6 0 3 44 14 1 1 1 0 472
Manuel Rodríguez, actual: 158 137 29 4 0 3 42 11 2 1 5 2 509
Manuel Rodríguez, projected: 158 136 30 6 0 4 48 17 1 1 3 1 658
Colin Poche, actual: 153 138 30 3 0 7 54 13 0 2 0 0 647
Colin Poche, projected: 153 136 27 5 1 6 50 14 1 2 1 0 605
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Richard Lovelady, actual: 119 106 25 3 0 2 34 9 1 1 2 0 521
Richard Lovelady, projected: 119 105 27 6 0 3 43 10 1 2 2 0 743
Jeffrey Springs, actual: 142 129 34 5 0 5 54 11 0 1 1 0 762
Jeffrey Springs, projected: 142 129 31 6 1 5 52 11 0 1 0 0 687
Drew Rasmussen, actual: 116 109 25 5 0 0 30 6 0 1 0 0 417
Drew Rasmussen, projected: 116 107 24 4 0 2 35 8 0 0 0 0 468
Chris Devenski, actual: 122 108 28 6 1 9 63 14 0 0 0 0 1167
Chris Devenski, projected: 122 112 26 5 1 4 46 8 0 1 1 0 637
Erasmo Ramírez, actual: 85 73 12 1 0 5 28 10 0 1 1 0 658
Erasmo Ramírez, projected: 85 78 20 4 0 3 33 5 0 1 1 0 737
Hunter Bigge, actual: 58 55 14 1 1 2 23 3 0 0 0 0 640
Hunter Bigge, projected: 58 54 14 1 1 2 21 4 0 0 0 0 719
Cole Sulser, actual: 43 35 3 0 0 0 3 6 1 1 0 0 115
Cole Sulser, projected: 43 38 8 2 0 1 14 5 0 0 0 0 522
Jacob Lopez, actual: 46 37 5 1 0 2 12 7 0 0 2 0 740
Jacob Lopez, projected: 46 40 9 2 0 1 15 4 0 0 2 0 690
Jacob Waguespack, actual: 51 41 13 2 0 1 18 10 0 0 0 0 1337
Jacob Waguespack, projected: 51 45 12 2 0 2 20 5 0 0 1 0 955
Joel Kuhnel, actual: 28 28 4 1 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 248
Joel Kuhnel, projected: 28 26 7 2 0 1 12 2 0 0 0 0 710
Mason Montgomery, actual: 37 32 6 3 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0 301
Mason Montgomery, projected: 37 32 6 3 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 0 301
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Justin Sterner, actual: 19 17 5 2 0 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 1047
Justin Sterner, projected: 19 17 5 2 0 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 1047
Tyler Zuber, actual: 15 13 3 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 1091
Tyler Zuber, projected: 15 12 3 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 982
Ben Rortvedt, actual: 11 9 3 1 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 1933
Ben Rortvedt, projected: 11 9 3 1 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 1933
Rays, Actual: 6022 5455 1286 217 18 196 2127 445 16 36 65 5 652
Rays, Projected: 6033 5447 1283 252 22 198 2172 459 16 41 69 3 657
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.236 0.236
Slugging Average: 0.390 0.399
Walks (per PA): 0.074 0.076
SOs (per PA): 0.233 0.240
On-Base Average: 0.299 0.301
Power Factor: 1.654 1.693
OPS: 0.689 0.700
TPP Runs (to date): 663 669

Runs differential:
Actual Runs -6 less than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.