Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Rangers 2025 Projected Batting Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Rangers Projected Batting

Through games of Sunday, 28 September 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each player and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date Plate Appearances to his career Plate Appearances, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of Plate Appearances. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career PAs and 250 PAs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of Plate Appearances that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more PAs the man or team will have in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a team with an abysmal .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they send to the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, that team, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a team with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half its batters make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, they would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his PAs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—PAs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the team’s total Plate Appearances; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team PA total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team PAs to actual PAs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s batting, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.995)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TOP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team pitching numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Nick Ahmed, actual: 5 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 84
Nick Ahmed, projected: 5 10 9 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 279
Tucker Barnhart, actual: 8 15 13 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 263
Tucker Barnhart, projected: 8 15 13 3 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 380
Jake Burger, actual: 103 376 356 84 15 1 16 149 12 0 3 5 0 645
Jake Burger, projected: 103 374 346 85 17 1 19 162 19 0 3 6 0 750
Evan Carter, actual: 63 220 194 48 9 2 5 76 19 0 0 7 0 808
Evan Carter, projected: 63 219 192 45 9 2 7 80 22 0 1 4 0 785
Blaine Crim, actual: 5 13 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 20
Blaine Crim, projected: 5 13 11 2 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 715
Ezequiel Durán, actual: 90 219 205 46 14 0 0 60 8 1 1 4 0 382
Ezequiel Durán, projected: 90 218 204 51 11 1 4 75 11 0 1 2 0 570
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Justin Foscue, actual: 4 9 9 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 69
Justin Foscue, projected: 4 9 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 40
Cody Freeman, actual: 36 121 114 26 4 0 3 39 5 1 1 0 0 439
Cody Freeman, projected: 36 120 113 26 4 0 3 39 5 1 1 0 0 442
Adolis García, actual: 135 547 507 115 28 0 19 200 28 0 7 5 0 588
Adolis García, projected: 135 544 498 118 25 1 25 219 37 0 5 5 0 702
Sam Haggerty, actual: 64 182 162 41 7 3 2 60 16 1 0 2 1 842
Sam Haggerty, projected: 64 181 160 38 7 1 3 57 16 1 1 2 0 684
Dustin Harris, actual: 19 43 40 8 3 0 1 14 3 0 0 0 0 392
Dustin Harris, projected: 19 43 39 9 3 0 2 17 3 0 0 0 0 542
Jonah Heim, actual: 124 433 395 84 14 0 11 131 32 1 4 1 0 510
Jonah Heim, projected: 124 431 395 89 17 0 13 147 31 0 3 2 0 544
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Michael Helman, actual: 38 110 99 23 5 1 5 45 7 3 0 1 0 728
Michael Helman, projected: 38 109 99 24 6 1 5 46 6 3 0 1 0 729
Kyle Higashioka, actual: 94 327 303 73 14 1 11 122 20 0 2 2 0 649
Kyle Higashioka, projected: 94 325 303 66 13 0 15 124 18 1 3 1 0 582
Josh Jung, actual: 131 511 482 121 23 1 14 188 27 0 0 2 0 610
Josh Jung, projected: 131 508 478 122 22 2 19 204 27 0 1 3 0 679
Wyatt Langford, actual: 134 573 489 118 25 1 22 211 74 0 5 5 0 863
Wyatt Langford, projected: 134 570 499 123 25 3 19 211 63 0 4 5 0 815
Jack Leiter, actual: 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jack Leiter, projected: 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Billy McKinney, actual: 6 21 20 4 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 461
Billy McKinney, projected: 6 21 19 4 1 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 601
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Dylan Moore, actual: 18 30 27 7 0 0 2 13 1 0 1 1 0 858
Dylan Moore, projected: 18 30 26 5 1 0 1 10 3 0 0 1 0 593
Jonathan Ornelas, actual: 4 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 27
Jonathan Ornelas, projected: 4 6 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 119
Alejandro Osuna, actual: 63 176 151 32 4 0 2 42 21 0 2 2 0 507
Alejandro Osuna, projected: 63 175 150 32 4 0 2 42 21 0 2 2 0 500
Joc Pederson, actual: 96 306 265 48 10 1 9 87 34 0 1 5 1 533
Joc Pederson, projected: 96 304 261 62 13 1 14 120 35 0 2 6 0 834
Kevin Pillar, actual: 20 43 43 9 2 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 289
Kevin Pillar, projected: 20 43 40 10 2 0 1 16 2 0 0 1 0 562
Corey Seager, actual: 102 445 380 103 19 0 21 185 58 0 2 5 0 1002
Corey Seager, projected: 102 443 394 114 24 1 20 201 43 0 3 4 0 999
Player (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TOP
Marcus Semien, actual: 127 534 470 108 16 1 15 171 50 0 9 5 0 677
Marcus Semien, projected: 127 531 478 121 24 3 19 208 47 1 3 2 0 793
Josh Smith, actual: 144 563 495 124 23 2 10 181 55 3 1 8 1 743
Josh Smith, projected: 144 560 487 115 23 1 11 172 53 3 3 14 0 676
Donovan Solano, actual: 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donovan Solano, projected: 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 706
Leody Taveras, actual: 30 82 79 19 3 1 1 27 2 1 0 0 0 490
Leody Taveras, projected: 30 82 75 18 3 1 2 27 5 1 1 0 0 592
Rowdy Tellez, actual: 50 127 116 30 5 0 6 53 9 0 1 1 0 784
Rowdy Tellez, projected: 50 126 114 27 5 0 6 50 10 0 1 1 0 673
Rangers, Actual: 162 6046 5443 1275 245 15 175 2075 486 11 40 63 3 669
Rangers, Projected: 162 6014 5421 1314 260 19 212 2250 482 11 38 62 0 701


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.234 0.242
Slugging Average: 0.381 0.415
Walks (per PA): 0.080 0.080
SOs (per PA): 0.219 0.230
On-Base Average: 0.302 0.310
Power Factor: 1.627 1.712
OPS: 0.684 0.725
Runs Expected from Actual Stats: 669
Runs Expected from Projected Stats: 701
Actual Runs Scored: 684

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 29 September 2025, at 12:00 pm Pacific Time.