Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Rangers 2025 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2025 Rangers Projected Pitching

Through games of Sunday, 28 September 2025.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.025)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Shawn Armstrong, actual: 71 284 254 40 8 2 5 67 20 21 222 0 4 6 2 0 4 359
Shawn Armstrong, projected: 71 291 260 62 14 1 8 101 23 32 222 1 3 4 2 1 5 643
Tucker Barnhart, actual: 1 11 10 5 1 0 0 6 0 3 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 2009
Tucker Barnhart, projected: 1 11 11 5 1 0 0 6 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1782
Caleb Boushley, actual: 25 193 177 54 12 0 5 81 14 33 130 0 0 2 3 1 1 892
Caleb Boushley, projected: 25 198 180 54 12 0 5 82 16 32 130 0 0 2 3 2 2 920
Marc Church, actual: 5 23 16 4 2 0 0 6 6 2 14 0 1 0 0 0 1 1167
Marc Church, projected: 5 24 17 4 3 0 0 7 5 2 14 0 1 0 0 0 1 1102
Patrick Corbin, actual: 31 663 602 161 31 2 21 259 51 79 466 3 4 3 1 1 26 769
Patrick Corbin, projected: 31 680 619 168 33 4 22 274 49 85 466 4 4 4 6 2 11 810
Will Wilson, actual: 1 9 8 3 1 0 1 7 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 2396
Will Wilson, projected: 1 9 8 3 1 0 1 7 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 2430
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Danny Coulombe, actual: 15 54 44 11 1 0 3 21 9 7 36 1 0 0 0 0 2 956
Danny Coulombe, projected: 15 55 50 11 2 0 1 18 5 5 36 0 0 0 0 0 1 562
Luis Curvelo, actual: 17 84 72 17 6 0 3 32 10 13 57 0 2 0 0 1 1 845
Luis Curvelo, projected: 17 86 74 17 6 0 3 33 10 13 57 0 2 0 0 1 1 829
Jacob deGrom, actual: 30 669 624 122 19 1 26 221 37 57 518 0 5 3 1 0 11 484
Jacob deGrom, projected: 30 686 636 133 24 2 17 210 39 54 518 4 4 3 4 1 13 464
Dane Dunning, actual: 5 46 39 9 3 0 2 18 5 4 32 0 1 1 0 1 0 794
Dane Dunning, projected: 5 47 42 11 2 0 1 18 4 6 32 0 0 1 0 0 1 745
Ezequiel Durán, actual: 4 11 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
Ezequiel Durán, projected: 4 11 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Carl Edwards Jr., actual: 2 11 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 38
Carl Edwards Jr., projected: 2 11 10 2 0 0 0 3 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Nathan Eovaldi, actual: 22 496 463 90 20 1 10 142 21 28 390 2 2 7 2 1 4 362
Nathan Eovaldi, projected: 22 508 466 119 24 2 13 188 33 56 390 2 2 4 4 1 4 611
Gerson Garabito, actual: 3 41 38 15 2 0 1 20 1 12 24 0 0 2 1 0 1 1586
Gerson Garabito, projected: 3 42 36 10 1 0 1 16 4 7 24 0 1 2 0 0 1 1080
Robert Garcia, actual: 71 269 242 58 8 0 8 90 22 26 192 3 1 1 2 2 3 625
Robert Garcia, projected: 71 276 249 59 8 0 6 86 21 32 192 3 1 1 1 2 5 568
Jon Gray, actual: 6 63 57 15 3 0 5 33 6 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 2 1123
Jon Gray, projected: 6 65 58 15 2 0 2 24 5 8 42 0 1 1 0 0 1 783
Codi Heuer, actual: 1 5 5 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1086
Codi Heuer, projected: 1 5 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
Luke Jackson, actual: 39 152 129 32 2 0 4 46 19 20 105 1 1 2 1 4 5 704
Luke Jackson, projected: 39 156 136 35 6 0 4 53 16 19 105 1 1 2 1 2 4 777
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Merrill Kelly, actual: 10 234 221 59 11 0 9 97 10 26 166 1 1 1 0 0 5 740
Merrill Kelly, projected: 10 240 220 53 11 1 8 88 17 26 166 1 1 1 1 1 4 664
Jacob Latz, actual: 33 348 310 69 14 3 7 110 37 28 257 0 1 0 0 2 9 537
Jacob Latz, projected: 33 357 313 70 11 2 10 114 41 31 257 0 2 1 1 3 6 609
Jack Leiter, actual: 29 646 571 127 25 0 18 206 67 69 455 1 2 5 3 0 17 655
Jack Leiter, projected: 29 662 581 138 27 2 20 230 68 87 455 2 4 6 4 0 17 760
Tyler Mahle, actual: 16 346 316 69 12 1 5 98 29 21 260 0 1 0 1 0 2 437
Tyler Mahle, projected: 16 355 317 77 14 2 12 130 30 40 260 2 2 3 2 1 2 678
Chris Martin, actual: 49 174 164 43 3 0 6 64 8 18 127 0 1 1 1 3 9 662
Chris Martin, projected: 49 178 169 44 6 0 5 65 6 18 127 0 1 1 2 1 4 628
Phil Maton, actual: 23 90 78 14 4 0 2 24 8 9 69 1 1 2 0 1 3 420
Phil Maton, projected: 23 92 81 19 4 1 2 31 8 11 69 0 1 2 0 0 1 648
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Hoby Milner, actual: 73 293 266 68 14 2 5 101 21 35 211 1 3 2 3 3 0 611
Hoby Milner, projected: 73 300 271 68 14 1 8 108 20 34 211 2 3 5 3 2 1 677
Kumar Rocker, actual: 14 287 256 71 12 3 11 122 23 42 193 1 3 4 1 0 11 974
Kumar Rocker, projected: 14 294 259 71 10 3 10 118 25 41 193 2 4 4 2 0 10 984
Rowdy Tellez, actual: 1 11 10 5 0 0 1 8 0 3 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 2391
Rowdy Tellez, projected: 1 11 9 4 0 0 0 5 0 2 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 1458
Jacob Webb, actual: 55 267 243 49 8 0 10 87 19 24 198 2 1 2 3 2 8 565
Jacob Webb, projected: 55 274 241 51 11 1 7 85 28 27 198 1 1 2 2 3 5 586
Cole Winn, actual: 33 162 138 23 7 1 3 41 17 8 125 2 1 4 0 2 1 367
Cole Winn, projected: 33 166 144 28 7 1 3 47 15 16 125 1 1 5 0 1 2 461
Rangers, Actual: 162 5942 5373 1235 229 16 172 2012 463 605 4329 19 36 50 25 24 127 602
Rangers, Projected: 162 6090 5473 1333 254 23 169 2150 490 692 4329 26 40 55 38 24 103 671


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.230 0.244
Slugging Average: 0.374 0.393
Walks (per PA): 0.078 0.080
SOs (per PA): 0.226 0.232
On-Base Average: 0.295 0.310
Power Factor: 1.629 1.613
OPS: 0.670 0.703
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 602
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 671
Actual Runs Scored: 605

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Monday, 29 September 2025, at 12:00 pm Pacific Time.