Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Rangers 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Rangers Projected Pitching

Through games of Sunday, 27 September 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.995)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Robby Ahlstrom, actual: 42 164 144 38 4 2 7 67 15 26 111 1 0 3 0 3 4 883
Robby Ahlstrom, projected: 42 163 143 38 4 2 7 67 15 26 111 1 0 3 0 3 4 887
Tyler Alexander, actual: 75 312 281 73 12 2 3 98 23 34 219 2 2 4 2 1 9 644
Tyler Alexander, projected: 75 311 286 77 14 2 11 127 18 39 219 1 3 3 2 1 4 775
Carter Baumler, actual: 4 27 20 4 1 0 1 8 6 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 926
Carter Baumler, projected: 4 27 20 4 1 0 1 8 6 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 932
Jalen Beeks, actual: 29 113 103 28 5 0 6 51 8 11 78 2 0 0 0 1 3 865
Jalen Beeks, projected: 29 112 100 26 6 0 3 40 10 14 78 1 1 1 1 0 1 760
Cody Bradford, actual: 10 193 180 55 12 0 6 85 10 21 132 1 1 1 1 0 5 887
Cody Bradford, projected: 10 192 180 46 9 2 7 79 9 22 132 1 2 1 1 0 4 761
Gavin Collyer, actual: 24 113 88 17 4 0 2 27 19 16 75 0 0 6 0 1 4 695
Gavin Collyer, projected: 24 112 88 17 4 0 2 27 19 16 75 0 0 6 0 1 4 702
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
José Corniell, actual: 2 28 23 11 5 1 2 24 4 10 13 1 0 0 0 1 0 3447
José Corniell, projected: 2 28 23 11 5 1 2 23 4 11 13 1 0 0 0 1 1 3564
Luis Curvelo, actual: 9 55 48 17 5 0 4 34 7 12 31 0 0 0 1 2 1 1877
Luis Curvelo, projected: 9 55 47 13 4 0 3 26 7 10 31 0 1 0 0 1 1 1332
Jacob deGrom, actual: 31 668 615 139 23 2 20 226 46 76 488 2 2 2 3 3 5 571
Jacob deGrom, projected: 31 665 616 130 23 2 16 206 39 55 488 3 4 3 4 2 12 481
Nathan Eovaldi, actual: 27 613 562 142 26 2 24 244 35 71 437 1 4 10 2 0 4 724
Nathan Eovaldi, projected: 27 610 560 142 29 3 17 227 40 67 437 3 3 5 4 1 5 666
Robert Garcia, actual: 20 71 62 13 2 0 1 18 9 7 56 0 0 0 0 0 3 371
Robert Garcia, projected: 20 71 64 15 2 0 2 22 6 8 56 1 0 0 0 0 1 510
Marco Gonzales, actual: 3 29 25 7 2 0 0 9 4 1 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 596
Marco Gonzales, projected: 3 29 27 7 2 0 1 12 2 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 702
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
MacKenzie Gore, actual: 34 750 665 160 40 3 19 263 71 89 519 2 5 7 2 2 7 712
MacKenzie Gore, projected: 34 746 661 167 32 3 22 269 72 89 519 1 5 7 4 0 14 762
Peyton Gray, actual: 49 249 223 56 9 2 9 96 17 29 168 2 3 3 5 3 4 879
Peyton Gray, projected: 49 248 222 56 9 2 9 96 17 29 168 2 3 3 5 3 4 883
Sam Haggerty, actual: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Sam Haggerty, projected: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Kyle Higashioka, actual: 3 18 14 8 4 0 1 15 1 7 9 0 2 1 0 0 0 3716
Kyle Higashioka, projected: 3 18 14 8 4 0 1 15 1 7 9 0 2 1 0 0 0 3726
Jakob Junis, actual: 53 234 211 51 8 0 4 71 18 22 163 0 0 5 0 3 4 601
Jakob Junis, projected: 53 233 213 56 11 1 8 93 14 28 163 1 2 4 1 1 3 764
Nolan Kingham, actual: 1 6 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2512
Nolan Kingham, projected: 1 6 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2592
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Jacob Latz, actual: 58 271 245 35 14 0 6 67 23 19 216 1 2 0 1 7 3 302
Jacob Latz, projected: 58 270 239 47 10 1 7 80 28 22 216 0 2 0 1 4 4 458
Jack Leiter, actual: 15 355 314 80 12 2 14 138 35 50 240 0 2 4 2 0 8 884
Jack Leiter, projected: 15 353 311 76 14 1 12 127 36 48 240 1 2 4 2 0 9 810
Nicky Lopez, actual: 1 7 7 4 0 0 0 4 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3465
Nicky Lopez, projected: 1 7 6 3 0 0 1 5 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3240
Adam Macko, actual: 8 46 39 14 2 0 2 22 4 7 27 0 2 1 0 0 0 1612
Adam Macko, projected: 8 46 39 12 1 0 2 18 4 6 27 0 1 1 0 1 1 1175
Chris Martin, actual: 16 66 62 25 7 0 4 44 2 15 42 0 1 1 0 0 1 1510
Chris Martin, projected: 16 66 62 17 2 0 2 25 2 7 42 0 0 1 1 1 2 749
Jordan Montgomery, actual: 13 104 97 20 3 0 3 32 6 12 78 0 0 1 0 1 3 483
Jordan Montgomery, projected: 13 104 95 24 5 0 3 38 7 12 78 0 1 1 1 0 1 660
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Chris Paddack, actual: 1 19 19 7 1 0 1 11 0 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 1295
Chris Paddack, projected: 1 19 18 5 1 0 1 8 1 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Ben Peoples, actual: 16 68 58 14 1 0 3 24 8 5 49 0 1 1 0 0 3 747
Ben Peoples, projected: 16 68 58 14 1 0 3 24 8 5 49 0 1 1 0 0 3 749
Cal Quantrill, actual: 32 443 409 89 15 0 13 143 25 41 330 0 2 6 3 1 10 537
Cal Quantrill, projected: 32 441 398 103 18 3 14 167 32 52 330 1 3 6 2 0 10 709
Kumar Rocker, actual: 30 645 576 147 28 5 20 245 61 74 444 0 4 4 3 1 11 800
Kumar Rocker, projected: 30 642 570 150 26 5 21 248 59 79 444 1 6 6 3 1 15 848
Joe Ross, actual: 5 35 33 9 1 0 2 16 2 5 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 888
Joe Ross, projected: 5 35 31 8 2 0 1 13 3 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 680
Winston Santos, actual: 1 9 8 2 0 0 1 5 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 1312
Winston Santos, projected: 1 9 8 2 0 0 1 5 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 1296
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Chase Silseth, actual: 26 97 79 21 5 1 3 37 13 12 61 1 0 4 0 3 3 1029
Chase Silseth, projected: 26 97 83 20 4 0 4 35 11 11 61 0 0 1 0 1 3 872
Emiliano Teodo, actual: 1 10 8 3 1 0 0 4 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1905
Emiliano Teodo, projected: 1 10 8 3 1 0 0 4 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1944
Trevor Williams, actual: 7 49 42 9 1 0 2 16 4 5 35 0 2 1 1 0 0 750
Trevor Williams, projected: 7 49 44 12 2 0 2 20 4 6 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 764
Cole Winn, actual: 51 215 195 54 8 3 7 89 16 32 144 2 1 1 1 1 1 890
Cole Winn, projected: 51 214 189 45 8 2 6 74 17 26 144 2 1 4 0 1 2 696
Rangers, Actual: 162 6085 5460 1353 261 25 190 2234 497 719 4258 18 37 68 27 35 97 727
Rangers, Projected: 162 6059 5428 1355 254 30 192 2229 497 713 4258 21 44 64 32 23 109 732


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.248 0.250
Slugging Average: 0.409 0.411
Walks (per PA): 0.082 0.082
SOs (per PA): 0.220 0.224
On-Base Average: 0.316 0.318
Power Factor: 1.651 1.645
OPS: 0.726 0.728
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 727
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 732
Actual Runs Scored: 719

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Tuesday, 29 September 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.