Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Rangers 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Rangers Projected Pitching

Through games of Tuesday, 22 September 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.996)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Robby Ahlstrom, actual: 42 164 144 38 4 2 7 67 15 26 111 1 0 3 0 3 4 883
Robby Ahlstrom, projected: 42 163 143 38 4 2 7 67 15 26 111 1 0 3 0 3 4 887
Tyler Alexander, actual: 71 293 264 68 12 1 3 91 21 32 205 2 2 4 2 0 8 644
Tyler Alexander, projected: 71 292 269 72 13 1 10 120 17 37 205 1 2 3 2 1 4 758
Carter Baumler, actual: 4 27 20 4 1 0 1 8 6 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 926
Carter Baumler, projected: 4 27 20 4 1 0 1 8 6 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 932
Jalen Beeks, actual: 29 113 103 28 5 0 6 51 8 11 78 2 0 0 0 1 3 865
Jalen Beeks, projected: 29 113 100 26 6 0 3 40 10 14 78 1 1 1 1 0 1 754
Cody Bradford, actual: 8 169 156 48 12 0 4 72 10 18 116 1 1 1 0 0 5 848
Cody Bradford, projected: 8 168 157 40 9 1 6 69 8 20 116 0 1 1 0 0 4 729
Gavin Collyer, actual: 23 105 80 15 4 0 1 22 19 14 69 0 0 6 0 1 3 654
Gavin Collyer, projected: 23 105 80 15 4 0 1 22 19 14 69 0 0 6 0 1 3 655
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
José Corniell, actual: 2 28 23 11 5 1 2 24 4 10 13 1 0 0 0 1 0 3447
José Corniell, projected: 2 28 23 11 5 1 2 23 4 11 13 1 0 0 0 1 1 3564
Luis Curvelo, actual: 9 55 48 17 5 0 4 34 7 12 31 0 0 0 1 2 1 1877
Luis Curvelo, projected: 9 55 47 13 4 0 3 26 7 10 31 0 1 0 0 1 1 1332
Jacob deGrom, actual: 30 645 595 131 22 1 20 215 43 68 476 2 2 2 3 3 4 545
Jacob deGrom, projected: 30 642 595 125 23 2 16 199 37 52 476 3 4 3 4 2 11 481
Nathan Eovaldi, actual: 26 595 546 138 23 2 24 237 33 70 424 1 4 10 2 0 4 729
Nathan Eovaldi, projected: 26 593 544 138 28 3 16 220 38 65 424 2 3 5 4 1 5 660
Robert Garcia, actual: 17 62 53 12 2 0 1 17 9 7 47 0 0 0 0 0 3 479
Robert Garcia, projected: 17 62 56 13 2 0 1 19 5 7 47 1 0 0 0 0 1 476
Marco Gonzales, actual: 3 29 25 7 2 0 0 9 4 1 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 596
Marco Gonzales, projected: 3 29 27 7 2 0 1 12 2 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 702
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
MacKenzie Gore, actual: 33 741 658 159 40 3 19 262 70 88 512 2 4 7 2 2 7 716
MacKenzie Gore, projected: 33 738 653 165 32 3 21 267 71 88 512 1 5 7 4 0 14 761
Peyton Gray, actual: 49 249 223 56 9 2 9 96 17 29 168 2 3 3 5 3 4 879
Peyton Gray, projected: 49 248 222 56 9 2 9 96 17 29 168 2 3 3 5 3 4 883
Sam Haggerty, actual: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Sam Haggerty, projected: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Kyle Higashioka, actual: 3 18 14 8 4 0 1 15 1 7 9 0 2 1 0 0 0 3716
Kyle Higashioka, projected: 3 18 14 8 4 0 1 15 1 7 9 0 2 1 0 0 0 3726
Jakob Junis, actual: 51 226 206 50 7 0 4 69 15 21 159 0 0 5 0 3 4 582
Jakob Junis, projected: 51 225 206 54 11 1 8 90 14 27 159 1 2 3 1 1 3 756
Nolan Kingham, actual: 1 6 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2512
Nolan Kingham, projected: 1 6 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2592
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Jacob Latz, actual: 56 261 236 34 14 0 5 63 22 18 208 1 2 0 1 6 3 291
Jacob Latz, projected: 56 260 230 46 10 1 6 77 27 21 208 0 2 0 1 3 4 451
Jack Leiter, actual: 15 355 314 80 12 2 14 138 35 50 240 0 2 4 2 0 8 884
Jack Leiter, projected: 15 354 311 76 14 1 12 127 36 48 240 1 2 4 2 0 9 810
Nicky Lopez, actual: 1 7 7 4 0 0 0 4 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3465
Nicky Lopez, projected: 1 7 6 3 0 0 1 5 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3240
Adam Macko, actual: 8 46 39 14 2 0 2 22 4 7 27 0 2 1 0 0 0 1612
Adam Macko, projected: 8 46 39 12 1 0 2 18 4 6 27 0 1 1 0 1 1 1175
Chris Martin, actual: 16 66 62 25 7 0 4 44 2 15 42 0 1 1 0 0 1 1510
Chris Martin, projected: 16 66 62 17 2 0 2 25 2 7 42 0 0 1 1 1 2 749
Jordan Montgomery, actual: 10 87 81 17 3 0 3 29 5 10 65 0 0 1 0 0 3 540
Jordan Montgomery, projected: 10 87 80 20 4 0 2 32 6 10 65 0 0 0 1 0 1 599
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Chris Paddack, actual: 1 19 19 7 1 0 1 11 0 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 1295
Chris Paddack, projected: 1 19 18 5 1 0 1 8 1 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 972
Ben Peoples, actual: 16 68 58 14 1 0 3 24 8 5 49 0 1 1 0 0 3 747
Ben Peoples, projected: 16 68 58 14 1 0 3 24 8 5 49 0 1 1 0 0 3 749
Cal Quantrill, actual: 32 443 409 89 15 0 13 143 25 41 330 0 2 6 3 1 10 537
Cal Quantrill, projected: 32 441 399 103 18 3 14 167 32 52 330 1 3 6 2 0 10 709
Kumar Rocker, actual: 29 627 560 144 26 5 20 240 59 73 429 0 4 4 3 0 11 824
Kumar Rocker, projected: 29 624 555 146 24 5 21 243 57 78 429 1 6 6 3 0 15 866
Joe Ross, actual: 5 35 33 9 1 0 2 16 2 5 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 888
Joe Ross, projected: 5 35 31 8 2 0 1 13 3 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 680
Winston Santos, actual: 1 9 8 2 0 0 1 5 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 1312
Winston Santos, projected: 1 9 8 2 0 0 1 5 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 1296
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Chase Silseth, actual: 23 87 71 18 4 1 2 30 12 10 56 1 0 3 0 3 3 894
Chase Silseth, projected: 23 87 75 18 3 0 3 31 10 10 56 0 0 1 0 1 3 817
Emiliano Teodo, actual: 1 10 8 3 1 0 0 4 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1905
Emiliano Teodo, projected: 1 10 8 3 1 0 0 4 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1944
Trevor Williams, actual: 5 39 33 7 1 0 1 11 3 3 28 0 2 1 1 0 0 693
Trevor Williams, projected: 5 39 35 9 2 0 1 16 3 5 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 648
Cole Winn, actual: 51 215 195 54 8 3 7 89 16 32 144 2 1 1 1 1 1 890
Cole Winn, projected: 51 214 190 45 8 2 6 74 17 26 144 2 1 4 0 1 2 696
Rangers, Actual: 157 5902 5296 1312 253 23 184 2163 480 693 4129 18 36 67 26 31 94 704
Rangers, Projected: 157 5881 5266 1313 248 28 182 2163 483 693 4129 19 41 62 31 21 107 707


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.248 0.249
Slugging Average: 0.408 0.411
Walks (per PA): 0.081 0.082
SOs (per PA): 0.220 0.224
On-Base Average: 0.316 0.317
Power Factor: 1.649 1.647
OPS: 0.725 0.728
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 704
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 707
Actual Runs Scored: 693

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Wednesday, 23 September 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.