Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Rangers 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Rangers Projected Pitching

Through games of Wednesday, 10 June 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 1.005)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Robby Ahlstrom, actual: 3 15 15 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 94
Robby Ahlstrom, projected: 3 15 15 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 108
Tyler Alexander, actual: 29 122 109 31 4 1 2 43 8 12 84 2 1 2 2 0 4 789
Tyler Alexander, projected: 29 123 113 31 5 1 5 51 7 16 84 0 1 1 1 0 2 860
Carter Baumler, actual: 4 27 20 4 1 0 1 8 6 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 926
Carter Baumler, projected: 4 27 20 4 1 0 1 8 6 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 932
Jalen Beeks, actual: 29 113 103 28 5 0 6 51 8 11 78 2 0 0 0 1 3 865
Jalen Beeks, projected: 29 114 101 26 6 0 3 41 10 14 78 1 1 1 1 0 1 749
Gavin Collyer, actual: 18 76 57 10 1 0 1 14 14 8 51 0 0 5 0 1 3 610
Gavin Collyer, projected: 18 76 57 10 1 0 1 14 14 8 51 0 0 5 0 1 3 612
Luis Curvelo, actual: 7 34 32 10 2 0 2 18 2 5 22 0 0 0 1 1 1 1217
Luis Curvelo, projected: 7 34 30 8 2 0 1 14 3 5 22 0 1 0 0 1 1 903
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Jacob deGrom, actual: 13 282 266 55 8 0 13 102 15 25 212 0 1 0 3 1 2 573
Jacob deGrom, projected: 13 283 263 55 10 1 7 88 16 22 212 1 2 1 2 1 5 474
Nathan Eovaldi, actual: 13 337 309 75 11 1 15 133 20 40 241 1 1 6 2 0 1 716
Nathan Eovaldi, projected: 13 339 311 79 16 2 9 126 22 37 241 1 2 3 2 1 3 673
Robert Garcia, actual: 9 34 27 5 1 0 0 6 7 5 24 0 0 0 0 0 3 523
Robert Garcia, projected: 9 34 31 7 1 0 1 10 3 4 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 594
MacKenzie Gore, actual: 14 309 272 63 14 3 6 101 33 33 213 1 1 2 1 0 4 687
MacKenzie Gore, projected: 14 310 274 70 13 1 9 112 30 36 213 1 2 3 2 0 6 775
Peyton Gray, actual: 15 94 84 19 2 0 2 27 7 12 64 1 1 1 4 1 2 734
Peyton Gray, projected: 15 94 84 19 2 0 2 27 7 12 64 1 1 1 4 1 2 734
Sam Haggerty, actual: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Sam Haggerty, projected: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Jakob Junis, actual: 24 108 100 16 5 0 0 21 5 5 86 0 0 3 0 1 1 195
Jakob Junis, projected: 24 108 99 26 5 0 4 44 6 13 86 0 1 2 1 0 1 682
Jacob Latz, actual: 24 110 102 13 5 0 2 24 7 6 90 0 1 0 1 0 1 252
Jacob Latz, projected: 24 111 98 20 4 0 3 34 12 9 90 0 1 0 0 1 2 479
Jack Leiter, actual: 13 310 275 66 8 2 11 111 31 38 213 0 0 4 1 0 6 774
Jack Leiter, projected: 13 311 274 65 12 1 10 109 32 40 213 1 1 3 2 0 7 760
Chris Martin, actual: 12 49 46 18 6 0 3 33 2 10 31 0 0 1 0 0 0 1469
Chris Martin, projected: 12 49 47 12 2 0 1 18 2 5 31 0 0 0 0 0 1 635
Cal Quantrill, actual: 12 100 88 19 4 0 1 26 9 9 74 0 1 2 1 0 7 525
Cal Quantrill, projected: 12 100 90 24 4 1 3 38 8 12 74 0 1 1 0 0 2 743
Kumar Rocker, actual: 12 262 232 55 6 2 6 83 26 24 183 0 2 2 1 0 9 699
Kumar Rocker, projected: 12 263 232 60 8 2 8 96 24 31 183 1 3 3 1 0 9 824
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Cole Winn, actual: 23 91 82 22 4 0 3 35 7 12 60 0 1 1 0 1 1 886
Cole Winn, projected: 23 91 80 17 4 0 2 29 8 10 60 1 1 2 0 1 1 606
Rangers, Actual: 67 2476 2221 511 87 9 74 838 207 257 1759 7 10 31 17 7 49 273
Rangers, Projected: 67 2485 2221 535 96 9 70 861 210 276 1759 8 18 28 16 7 48 283


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.230 0.241
Slugging Average: 0.377 0.388
Walks (per PA): 0.084 0.085
SOs (per PA): 0.225 0.227
On-Base Average: 0.303 0.312
Power Factor: 1.640 1.609
OPS: 0.681 0.700
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 273
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 283
Actual Runs Scored: 257

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Thursday, 11 June 2026, at 5:02 am Pacific Time.