Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Rangers 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Rangers Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.999)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Nathan Eovaldi, actual: 696 642 147 28 2 23 248 42 0 5 7 0 590
Nathan Eovaldi, projected: 695 637 165 34 3 19 261 47 3 3 5 0 676
Andrew Heaney, actual: 693 634 159 30 1 23 260 41 3 3 12 0 721
Andrew Heaney, projected: 692 629 157 31 2 28 276 48 2 4 10 0 742
Michael Lorenzen, actual: 419 364 82 14 1 15 143 48 0 2 5 0 645
Michael Lorenzen, projected: 418 370 90 17 1 12 144 40 2 2 4 0 666
José Ureña, actual: 463 414 105 19 1 13 165 39 2 4 4 0 714
José Ureña, projected: 462 411 110 21 2 15 179 40 2 4 6 0 809
Jon Gray, actual: 439 408 107 17 4 11 165 28 1 2 0 0 696
Jon Gray, projected: 438 395 101 18 3 13 164 34 2 3 4 0 719
Dane Dunning, actual: 421 373 97 19 1 18 172 40 0 2 6 0 874
Dane Dunning, projected: 420 375 97 20 1 13 158 36 0 3 6 0 763
Cody Bradford, actual: 308 293 64 9 4 10 111 13 0 1 1 0 547
Cody Bradford, projected: 308 289 68 14 3 12 124 14 1 3 1 0 640
David Robertson, actual: 296 262 53 6 0 5 74 27 0 1 5 1 449
David Robertson, projected: 296 262 54 10 1 6 84 29 1 1 2 0 497
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
José Leclerc, actual: 288 247 56 9 0 7 86 32 3 2 4 0 673
José Leclerc, projected: 288 242 45 12 1 5 75 38 2 2 4 0 526
Kirby Yates, actual: 237 203 23 5 0 3 37 28 0 3 2 1 257
Kirby Yates, projected: 237 208 41 7 0 7 70 23 0 2 4 0 561
Chase Anderson, actual: 31 28 9 4 0 2 19 2 0 0 1 0 1455
Chase Anderson, projected: 31 28 7 1 0 1 12 3 0 0 0 0 650
Andrew Chafin, actual: 84 68 17 1 0 3 27 15 0 1 0 0 873
Andrew Chafin, projected: 84 74 17 3 0 1 25 8 1 1 1 0 545
Jacob Latz, actual: 192 162 39 4 0 6 61 27 0 2 1 0 752
Jacob Latz, projected: 192 165 37 3 0 7 63 25 0 2 1 0 686
Max Scherzer, actual: 177 165 40 11 0 7 72 10 0 1 1 0 640
Max Scherzer, projected: 177 162 36 8 1 5 60 11 1 1 2 0 539
Jonathan Hernández, actual: 181 151 39 8 1 6 67 26 1 2 1 0 885
Jonathan Hernández, projected: 181 153 38 6 1 5 59 22 1 2 3 0 786
Jesús Tinoco, actual: 50 41 11 1 0 2 18 7 0 0 2 0 1139
Jesús Tinoco, projected: 50 43 9 1 0 2 18 6 0 0 1 0 636
Jack Leiter, actual: 173 148 44 9 2 7 78 17 1 3 3 1 1272
Jack Leiter, projected: 173 148 44 9 2 7 78 17 1 3 3 1 1272
Brock Burke, actual: 72 60 21 6 0 3 36 9 0 1 2 0 1661
Brock Burke, projected: 72 65 16 3 0 3 28 5 1 0 1 0 706
Grant Anderson, actual: 120 109 33 1 0 11 67 10 0 0 1 0 1204
Grant Anderson, projected: 120 108 31 3 0 7 55 10 0 1 1 0 975
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Gerson Garabito, actual: 115 96 23 3 0 4 38 12 1 2 4 0 806
Gerson Garabito, projected: 115 96 23 3 0 4 38 12 1 2 4 0 806
Matt Festa, actual: 92 83 17 5 1 2 30 7 0 1 1 0 575
Matt Festa, projected: 92 80 18 4 1 3 35 9 1 1 1 0 734
Yerry Rodríguez, actual: 78 66 16 3 0 5 34 11 0 0 1 0 1018
Yerry Rodríguez, projected: 78 67 21 6 0 4 37 8 0 1 1 0 1276
Walter Pennington, actual: 82 69 19 3 1 1 27 11 0 0 2 0 967
Walter Pennington, projected: 82 69 19 3 1 1 26 11 0 0 2 0 937
Cole Winn, actual: 77 69 18 3 0 2 27 4 0 1 3 0 778
Cole Winn, projected: 77 69 18 3 0 2 27 4 0 1 3 0 778
Josh Sborz, actual: 69 65 16 4 0 1 23 4 0 0 0 0 628
Josh Sborz, projected: 69 61 15 3 0 2 25 7 0 0 0 0 668
Shaun Anderson, actual: 17 16 6 2 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 1248
Shaun Anderson, projected: 17 15 5 1 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 1252
Tyler Mahle, actual: 56 50 14 2 1 1 21 4 0 1 1 0 876
Tyler Mahle, projected: 56 50 12 2 0 2 21 5 0 0 1 0 681
Kumar Rocker, actual: 55 45 12 0 0 1 15 6 1 2 1 0 967
Kumar Rocker, projected: 55 45 12 0 0 1 15 6 1 2 1 0 967
Jacob deGrom, actual: 44 42 11 3 0 1 17 1 0 0 1 0 636
Jacob deGrom, projected: 44 41 9 2 0 1 13 3 0 0 0 0 435
Daniel Robert, actual: 26 22 6 0 0 1 9 2 0 0 2 0 901
Daniel Robert, projected: 26 22 6 0 0 1 9 2 0 0 2 0 901
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Austin Pruitt, actual: 24 20 8 1 0 3 18 3 0 1 0 0 2503
Austin Pruitt, projected: 24 22 6 1 0 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 720
Andrew Knizner, actual: 11 8 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 392
Andrew Knizner, projected: 11 9 2 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 513
Owen White, actual: 18 17 9 3 0 1 15 1 0 0 0 0 3375
Owen White, projected: 18 16 7 1 0 1 13 1 0 0 0 0 1777
Marc Church, actual: 4 4 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 480
Marc Church, projected: 4 4 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 480
Rangers, Actual: 6108 5444 1323 235 20 198 2192 530 13 44 74 3 720
Rangers, Projected: 6102 5430 1337 252 23 192 2213 529 23 45 74 1 713
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.243 0.246
Slugging Average: 0.403 0.408
Walks (per PA): 0.087 0.087
SOs (per PA): 0.224 0.229
On-Base Average: 0.316 0.319
Power Factor: 1.657 1.655
OPS: 0.719 0.727
TPP Runs (to date): 738 713

Runs differential:
Actual Runs 25 greater than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2024 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.