Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Blue Jays 2024 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2024 Blue Jays Projected Pitching

Through games of Monday, 30 September 2024.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.994)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
José Berríos, actual: 786 714 168 21 4 31 290 54 2 2 13 1 635
José Berríos, projected: 781 708 174 33 2 26 287 55 2 4 12 0 677
Kevin Gausman, actual: 756 693 165 41 3 20 272 56 1 3 2 1 631
Kevin Gausman, projected: 751 690 175 36 3 22 283 51 3 4 4 0 671
Yusei Kikuchi, actual: 497 459 125 20 1 17 198 30 4 2 2 0 733
Yusei Kikuchi, projected: 494 447 115 21 2 20 200 40 1 2 4 0 783
Chris Bassitt, actual: 758 667 180 29 1 18 265 70 2 3 16 0 795
Chris Bassitt, projected: 753 677 163 32 2 20 256 58 1 4 13 0 651
Bowden Francis, actual: 408 377 74 15 0 17 140 22 1 1 7 0 500
Bowden Francis, projected: 406 375 72 14 0 16 135 22 1 1 6 0 464
Ryan Yarbrough, actual: 117 104 18 3 0 2 27 7 0 1 5 0 328
Ryan Yarbrough, projected: 116 107 27 6 0 4 44 6 0 1 2 0 689
Yariel Rodríguez, actual: 368 323 74 16 1 11 125 40 0 1 3 1 663
Yariel Rodríguez, projected: 366 321 74 16 1 11 124 40 0 1 3 1 672
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Nate Pearson, actual: 182 158 45 9 0 8 78 17 0 5 2 0 1077
Nate Pearson, projected: 181 158 38 7 0 8 69 19 0 3 2 0 834
Trevor Richards, actual: 218 190 36 6 0 7 63 24 1 2 0 1 561
Trevor Richards, projected: 217 190 45 8 1 7 77 22 1 2 1 0 702
Génesis Cabrera, actual: 271 235 63 11 0 10 104 29 1 4 2 0 889
Génesis Cabrera, projected: 269 231 53 12 0 8 88 31 2 2 4 0 718
Chad Green, actual: 210 190 41 7 0 8 72 14 0 4 2 0 556
Chad Green, projected: 209 191 41 9 0 7 73 13 1 2 1 0 524
Zach Pop, actual: 209 185 45 6 0 9 78 19 1 2 2 0 788
Zach Pop, projected: 208 186 47 7 1 6 72 16 1 1 4 0 708
Brendon Little, actual: 193 172 41 5 0 7 67 19 1 0 1 0 669
Brendon Little, projected: 192 170 41 5 0 8 69 19 1 0 2 0 733
Tim Mayza, actual: 121 106 36 9 1 3 56 12 0 3 0 0 1366
Tim Mayza, projected: 120 109 27 6 0 3 43 9 0 1 1 0 639
Erik Swanson, actual: 168 153 36 10 0 11 79 14 0 0 1 0 829
Erik Swanson, projected: 167 154 35 7 1 7 65 11 0 0 1 0 625
Yimi García, actual: 115 104 16 6 0 3 31 8 1 0 2 0 340
Yimi García, projected: 114 104 23 4 0 4 41 7 1 1 2 0 577
Dillon Tate, actual: 16 13 4 1 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 1083
Dillon Tate, projected: 16 14 3 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 413
Ryan Burr, actual: 140 127 29 10 0 4 51 12 0 0 1 0 633
Ryan Burr, projected: 139 120 28 6 0 5 50 15 1 1 1 0 728
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Alek Manoah, actual: 103 90 17 2 0 5 34 8 0 1 4 0 715
Alek Manoah, projected: 102 90 19 4 0 3 32 9 0 1 3 0 611
Mitch White, actual: 42 37 10 2 1 1 17 4 0 1 0 0 852
Mitch White, projected: 42 37 10 2 0 1 16 4 0 0 0 0 736
Tommy Nance, actual: 93 81 18 4 1 2 30 9 1 1 1 0 700
Tommy Nance, projected: 92 80 20 4 1 3 33 10 0 0 2 0 868
Yerry Rodríguez, actual: 27 22 10 3 0 2 19 2 0 2 1 0 3288
Yerry Rodríguez, projected: 27 23 7 2 0 1 13 3 0 0 0 0 1086
José Cuas, actual: 18 12 3 0 0 1 6 4 0 0 2 0 1593
José Cuas, projected: 18 15 4 1 0 0 6 2 0 0 1 0 696
Jordan Romano, actual: 62 56 16 3 0 4 31 4 1 0 1 0 1010
Jordan Romano, projected: 62 55 11 2 0 2 18 6 0 0 1 0 543
Nick Robertson, actual: 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nick Robertson, projected: 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 669
Easton Lucas, actual: 22 18 6 0 1 1 11 4 0 0 0 0 1470
Easton Lucas, projected: 22 18 6 1 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 1190
Brett de Geus, actual: 11 9 3 1 1 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 1568
Brett de Geus, projected: 11 9 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 948
Luis Frías, actual: 22 19 8 3 0 1 14 3 0 0 0 0 2535
Luis Frías, projected: 22 18 5 2 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 904
Wes Parsons, actual: 23 21 6 1 0 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 1324
Wes Parsons, projected: 23 19 5 1 0 1 9 3 0 0 0 0 989
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP
Paolo Espino, actual: 44 37 14 3 2 3 30 5 0 1 1 0 2141
Paolo Espino, projected: 44 40 11 2 0 2 20 3 0 0 0 0 780
Brandon Eisert, actual: 26 22 5 1 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 380
Brandon Eisert, projected: 26 22 5 1 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 380
Isiah Kiner-Falefa, actual: 9 6 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 903
Isiah Kiner-Falefa, projected: 9 8 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 634
Ernie Clement, actual: 5 5 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1361
Ernie Clement, projected: 5 5 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1099
Tyler Heineman, actual: 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 316
Tyler Heineman, projected: 4 4 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 480
Blue Jays, Actual: 6047 5412 1316 249 17 208 2223 503 17 40 71 4 712
Blue Jays, Projected: 6011 5398 1293 255 14 195 2166 487 16 31 70 1 669
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB SH SF HBP CI TPP


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.243 0.240
Slugging Average: 0.411 0.401
Walks (per PA): 0.083 0.081
SOs (per PA): 0.217 0.232
On-Base Average: 0.314 0.309
Power Factor: 1.689 1.675
OPS: 0.724 0.710
TPP Runs (to date): 743 671

Runs differential:
Actual Runs 72 greater than Projected Runs.





  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2025 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Saturday, 5 October 2024, at 4:39 pm Pacific Time.