Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Blue Jays 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Blue Jays Projected Pitching

Through games of Saturday, 16 May 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.997)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Dylan Cease, actual: 9 217 192 41 6 0 1 50 21 17 157 0 1 3 1 0 8 470
Dylan Cease, projected: 9 216 191 43 9 1 6 71 22 24 157 0 1 2 1 0 4 648
Patrick Corbin, actual: 7 147 130 38 7 0 3 54 10 15 103 1 2 4 0 0 2 741
Patrick Corbin, projected: 7 147 133 36 7 1 5 59 10 18 103 1 1 1 1 0 2 787
Lázaro Estrada, actual: 1 14 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 47
Lázaro Estrada, projected: 1 14 12 3 1 0 1 5 1 2 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 810
Braydon Fisher, actual: 23 95 82 17 6 0 2 29 10 12 74 0 1 2 0 1 0 420
Braydon Fisher, projected: 23 95 83 16 4 0 2 25 9 9 74 0 1 2 1 1 2 465
Josh Fleming, actual: 1 18 14 6 0 0 1 9 2 4 9 0 1 1 1 0 0 2819
Josh Fleming, projected: 1 18 16 5 1 0 1 7 1 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1296
Mason Fluharty, actual: 23 70 61 15 2 0 1 20 7 9 49 1 1 0 0 1 0 576
Mason Fluharty, projected: 23 70 61 12 2 0 2 20 8 9 49 0 0 0 0 1 0 521
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Kevin Gausman, actual: 9 209 197 47 8 1 6 75 9 24 154 2 1 0 0 0 4 569
Kevin Gausman, projected: 9 208 192 48 10 1 6 77 14 23 154 1 1 1 1 0 4 648
Tyler Heineman, actual: 2 17 16 7 3 0 1 13 1 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2417
Tyler Heineman, projected: 2 17 16 8 2 0 1 12 0 6 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 2835
Jeff Hoffman, actual: 21 96 85 28 3 0 3 40 8 16 58 0 1 2 0 3 6 1293
Jeff Hoffman, projected: 21 96 84 21 5 1 4 38 10 13 58 1 1 1 1 1 2 1034
Eric Lauer, actual: 8 162 144 38 5 1 11 78 16 27 109 0 1 0 0 0 2 1042
Eric Lauer, projected: 8 162 145 36 7 0 6 63 14 19 109 1 1 1 1 0 1 770
Chase Lee, actual: 1 5 5 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1086
Chase Lee, projected: 1 5 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
Brendon Little, actual: 5 24 20 10 3 0 3 22 3 11 11 1 0 0 0 1 3 3839
Brendon Little, projected: 5 24 20 5 1 0 1 7 3 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1231
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Joe Mantiply, actual: 16 67 60 15 3 0 1 21 3 4 51 2 1 1 0 0 1 451
Joe Mantiply, projected: 16 67 61 17 3 1 1 26 4 9 51 0 0 0 1 1 1 648
Spencer Miles, actual: 13 100 93 20 2 0 2 28 7 9 74 0 0 0 1 0 0 463
Spencer Miles, projected: 13 100 93 20 2 0 2 28 7 9 74 0 0 0 1 0 0 461
Tommy Nance, actual: 20 85 76 16 2 0 1 21 8 9 63 1 0 0 1 0 6 478
Tommy Nance, projected: 20 85 75 17 3 0 2 26 8 10 63 0 0 1 1 1 4 608
Cody Ponce, actual: 1 10 9 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 509
Cody Ponce, projected: 1 10 9 3 1 0 1 5 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1458
Yariel Rodríguez, actual: 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yariel Rodríguez, projected: 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 486
Tyler Rogers, actual: 21 84 77 17 2 0 0 19 6 5 61 1 0 0 2 3 0 371
Tyler Rogers, projected: 21 84 78 19 3 0 1 26 4 7 61 0 0 1 1 0 1 494
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Max Scherzer, actual: 5 84 74 22 2 0 7 45 8 20 56 0 1 1 0 0 1 1190
Max Scherzer, projected: 5 84 77 17 4 0 3 29 5 8 56 0 0 1 0 0 1 616
Louis Varland, actual: 22 95 85 19 2 0 0 21 9 5 71 0 1 0 1 1 3 405
Louis Varland, projected: 22 95 86 23 4 1 4 38 7 11 71 1 1 1 1 0 1 766
Austin Voth, actual: 1 12 11 3 1 0 0 4 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 682
Austin Voth, projected: 1 12 11 3 1 0 0 5 1 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 648
Trey Yesavage, actual: 4 81 72 17 4 0 0 21 8 3 58 0 0 1 0 0 1 472
Trey Yesavage, projected: 4 81 72 17 3 0 0 20 8 5 58 0 0 1 0 0 1 486
Blue Jays, Actual: 45 1695 1517 378 62 2 44 576 141 198 1201 9 12 15 8 10 38 185
Blue Jays, Projected: 45 1693 1523 371 73 6 49 590 137 193 1201 5 7 15 11 5 24 188


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.249 0.244
Slugging Average: 0.380 0.387
Walks (per PA): 0.083 0.081
SOs (per PA): 0.241 0.243
On-Base Average: 0.317 0.311
Power Factor: 1.524 1.590
OPS: 0.697 0.698
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 185
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 188
Actual Runs Scored: 198

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Sunday, 17 May 2026, at 2:41 pm Pacific Time.