Skip to main content 

Owing to the width of most of the many data tables on this site, it is best viewed from a desktop computer. If you are on a mobile device (phone or tablet), you will obtain a better viewing experience by rotating your device a quarter-turn (to get the so-called “panorama” screen view).


The Owlcroft Baseball-Analysis Site




Baseball team and player performance examined realistically and accurately.
 Click here to email us. 



You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
(Click on any image above to see it at full size.)

You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You are here:  Home  »  dailies  »  teams  »  individual  »  projected  »   this page
You can get a site directory by clicking on the “hamburger” icon () in the upper right of this page.
Or you can search this site with Google (standard Google-search rules apply).

Search term(s):



Athletics 2026 Projected Pitching Performance


All raw data supplied courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.
They do a wonderful job, and deserve your support.

2026 Athletics Projected Pitching

Through games of Wednesday, 1 July 2026.
All results are from true, unadjusted data.

Explanation of the Table

The Table below shows two lines for each pitcher and for the team as a whole: Actual and Projected. The Actual lines are just what it says: the actual stats for this season to date; the Projected lines want a little explanation.

The projecting has two steps. The first is simple: for each man, we calculate the ratio of his current-season-to-date BFPs (Batters Faced Pitcher, the equivalent of Plate Appearances for batters) to his career BFPs, then multiply all his career stats by that ratio to get what one might call his “raw” career-performance data pro-rated to his current-year number of BFPs. So, as a hypothetical example, a man with 5,000 career BFPs and 250 BFPs this season would have a ratio of 250/5000, or .050; so, if he had yielded, say, 1215 career Hits, his raw projected Hits number for this season would be 1215 x .05, or 61 (if the calculated number is fractional, as with 60.75, we round it off to the nearest whole number).

That much is simple and, we hope, clear. The second adjustment takes a little explaining. It derives from the fact that—for a team or for an individual man—the number of BFPs that will be had for a given number of Outs made (which is to say “innings played”) depends exactly on the on-base percentage: the higher the on-base percentage, the more BFPs the man or team will see in any given number of innings.

To clarify: imagine a staff with a great .250 on-base percentage; that number means that, on average, one man in four that they see at the plate will get on safely. The converse of that is that three men in four will make out. (For simplicity’s sake in this elementary example, we ignore outs made on the bases.) So, in an average inning, the batters, to make the three outs that constitute an inning, will send 4 men to the plate. If we next imagine a staff with an equally absurd .500 on-base percentage, only half the batters it faces make an out: thus, to make the three outs that define an inning, the batters would have—again, on average—to send 6 men to the plate. So (as should be intuitively obvious anyway), for a given number of innings, a higher OBP means more PAs.

The consequence of that is that each man’s “raw”stat projections, which were based on his BFPs for this season, are slightly inaccurate, because his—and the team’s—BFPs would be different (perhaps higher, perhaps lower) from what they are if all the men were performing at their career rates. To correct for that, we calculate each man’s career "outs rate" (all Outs made per plate appearance, which does include outs made behind him on the bases) and multiply it by his percentage of the staff’s total BFPs; we then sum up those outs rates to get a projected team Outs rate, and from that—holding Outs made (which, again, is just innings played) constant—we can reckon the projected team BFP total. We can then adjust each projected stat line by the ratio of expected team BFPs to actual BFPs (which normally yields a number fairly close to, but not equalling,1.0), giving us the true projected stats for each man and for the team.

(For this season for this team’s pitching, the adjustment factor, rounded to three decimal places—the actual calculations use many more decimals— is 0.978)

Incidentally, that last adjustment is the reason that even rookies, whose whole “career” is just the current season, can have “adjusted” lines that differ slightly from their actual data lines, and why the TPP numbers here may differ slightly from those on other pages here.

You can see the overall “win-capability” of the team (its wins projected from these team numbers and the corresponding team batting numbers) at our “Projected Team-Performances” page.

The Table

Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Elvis Alvarado, actual: 21 90 83 18 6 0 5 39 7 14 69 0 0 0 1 0 0 615
Elvis Alvarado, projected: 21 88 78 17 4 0 4 32 9 10 69 0 0 1 1 0 1 648
Scott Barlow, actual: 36 152 124 26 7 0 7 54 19 26 100 0 2 7 1 2 2 916
Scott Barlow, projected: 36 149 128 28 6 0 4 46 16 16 100 0 1 2 1 1 4 684
Mason Barnett, actual: 9 59 52 8 2 0 1 13 7 2 46 0 0 0 0 1 0 298
Mason Barnett, projected: 9 58 51 12 3 0 1 19 6 7 46 0 0 0 0 0 1 540
Brady Basso, actual: 4 25 23 11 7 1 1 23 1 6 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 3188
Brady Basso, projected: 4 24 22 6 1 0 1 10 2 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1094
Aaron Civale, actual: 14 306 280 87 17 1 14 148 20 38 203 1 2 2 0 1 4 1043
Aaron Civale, projected: 14 299 273 69 15 1 11 118 20 35 203 1 2 3 2 0 3 764
Carlos Cortes, actual: 3 18 14 4 1 0 1 8 4 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1294
Carlos Cortes, projected: 3 18 14 4 1 0 1 8 4 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1296
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Joey Estes, actual: 1 18 16 5 2 1 1 12 1 4 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 1117
Joey Estes, projected: 1 18 16 4 1 0 1 8 1 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 810
Tyler Ferguson, actual: 1 8 8 4 1 0 2 11 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3810
Tyler Ferguson, projected: 1 8 7 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 324
J.T. Ginn, actual: 19 393 345 75 14 0 10 119 41 36 284 1 2 4 2 0 8 583
J.T. Ginn, projected: 19 384 344 84 16 1 13 141 34 43 284 0 1 5 2 1 7 682
Hogan Harris, actual: 42 179 150 36 5 0 4 53 25 16 117 0 1 3 0 2 1 775
Hogan Harris, projected: 42 175 151 37 9 0 4 59 20 20 117 1 1 2 1 1 3 729
Geoff Hartlieb, actual: 4 39 35 11 3 0 1 17 3 5 26 0 1 0 0 0 1 1010
Geoff Hartlieb, projected: 4 38 31 10 2 0 1 16 5 7 26 0 1 1 0 0 0 1134
Gage Jump, actual: 7 160 146 35 5 0 2 46 10 13 120 0 2 2 1 0 2 476
Gage Jump, projected: 7 156 143 34 5 0 2 45 10 13 120 0 2 2 1 0 2 463
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Michael Kelly, actual: 5 32 26 12 1 2 1 20 6 9 15 0 0 0 0 0 3 3490
Michael Kelly, projected: 5 31 27 7 1 0 1 10 3 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 1004
Brooks Kriske, actual: 2 11 10 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 326
Brooks Kriske, projected: 2 11 9 2 1 0 1 5 2 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1134
Matt Krook, actual: 5 21 16 6 0 1 1 11 4 7 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 2359
Matt Krook, projected: 5 21 16 6 1 0 1 10 4 7 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 2009
Joel Kuhnel, actual: 25 108 98 27 6 0 2 39 6 12 77 0 2 2 0 0 1 678
Joel Kuhnel, projected: 25 106 95 26 5 0 4 43 7 15 77 0 1 2 0 1 2 784
Mark Leiter Jr., actual: 32 127 115 31 5 0 2 42 10 16 89 0 1 1 0 1 4 673
Mark Leiter Jr., projected: 32 124 110 27 5 1 4 46 10 17 89 0 1 2 1 1 3 770
Jacob Lopez, actual: 12 243 204 60 10 0 11 103 33 39 152 2 4 0 1 0 7 1219
Jacob Lopez, projected: 12 238 206 51 9 1 9 89 25 32 152 1 1 4 1 0 6 918
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Luis Medina, actual: 28 171 147 38 8 1 4 60 20 21 116 1 2 1 1 1 1 793
Luis Medina, projected: 28 167 144 38 10 1 4 62 19 23 116 0 2 2 1 1 2 833
Luis Morales, actual: 3 55 42 17 3 0 5 35 12 15 28 0 0 1 0 0 1 2557
Luis Morales, projected: 3 54 47 12 2 0 3 22 6 7 28 0 0 0 0 0 1 1188
Kade Morris, actual: 2 35 30 12 1 0 3 22 4 10 21 0 1 0 0 0 0 1797
Kade Morris, projected: 2 34 29 12 1 0 3 22 4 10 21 0 1 0 0 0 0 1863
Jack Perkins, actual: 22 228 202 51 8 2 6 81 17 36 153 0 2 7 1 0 2 823
Jack Perkins, projected: 22 223 196 45 8 1 6 72 20 31 153 0 2 5 2 0 2 722
Luis Severino, actual: 12 271 236 61 10 2 9 102 31 33 188 2 0 2 1 0 3 772
Luis Severino, projected: 12 265 240 58 12 1 8 95 20 30 188 1 1 3 2 0 3 662
Jeffrey Springs, actual: 18 407 367 96 16 3 24 190 33 66 280 0 5 2 6 0 4 976
Jeffrey Springs, projected: 18 398 361 87 17 2 15 154 31 47 280 0 3 1 3 0 6 738
Pitcher (alphabetical by last name) G PA AB H 2B 3B HR TB BB R OUTS SH SF HBP ROE IBB SB TPP
Justin Sterner, actual: 40 158 146 35 5 0 8 64 9 19 116 1 2 0 0 1 2 684
Justin Sterner, projected: 40 154 138 30 4 0 6 53 11 16 116 0 2 2 1 1 6 632
José Suarez, actual: 17 106 98 27 8 0 3 44 6 12 74 0 0 2 0 1 1 742
José Suarez, projected: 17 104 92 25 6 0 4 42 10 14 74 0 0 1 1 0 1 829
Athletics, Actual: 87 3420 3013 795 151 14 128 1358 330 460 2334 8 31 37 15 10 48 462
Athletics, Projected: 87 3345 2968 732 145 9 112 1229 300 413 2334 4 22 38 20 7 55 402


Assorted Team Stats:
Stat Actual Projected
Batting Average: 0.264 0.247
Slugging Average: 0.451 0.414
Walks (per PA): 0.096 0.090
SOs (per PA): 0.214 0.230
On-Base Average: 0.341 0.322
Power Factor: 1.708 1.679
OPS: 0.791 0.736
Runs Calculated from Actual Stats: 462
Runs Calculated from Projected Stats: 402
Actual Runs Scored: 460

Return to the page top. ↑




  Advertisement:


  Advertisement:



Want detailed, careful, unhysterical analysis of the effects of “Performance-Enhancing Drugs” in baseball? Click here to visit the Steroids & Baseball web site.

All content copyright © 2002 - 2026 by The Owlcroft Company.

This web page is strictly compliant with the WHATWG (Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group) HyperText Markup Language (HTML5) Protocol versionless “Living Standard” and the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS3) Protocol v3  — because we care about interoperability. Click on the logos below to test us!



This page was last modified on Thursday, 2 July 2026, at 5:31 am Pacific Time.